Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T00:10:25.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The motion of a spherical liquid drop at high Reynolds number

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2006

J. F. Harper  and
D. W. Moore
J. F. Harper
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Bristol
Now at the Department of Mathematics, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
D. W. Moore
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Imperial College, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The steady motion of a liquid drop in another liquid of comparable density and viscosity is studied theoretically. Both inside and outside the drop, the Reynolds number is taken to be large enough for boundary-layer theory to hold, but small enough for surface tension to keep the drop nearly spherical. Surface-active impurities are assumed absent. We investigate the boundary layers associated with the inviscid first approximation to the flow, which is shown to be Hill's spherical vortex inside, and potential flow outside. The boundary layers are shown to perturb the velocity field only slightly at high Reynolds numbers, and to obey linear equations which are used to find first and second approximations to the drag coefficient and the rate of internal circulation.

Drag coefficients calculated from the theory agree quite well with experimental values for liquids which satisfy the conditions of the theory. There appear to be no experimental results available to test our prediction of the internal circulation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , 3 May 1968 , pp. 367 - 391
Copyright
© 1968 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chandrasekhar, S. 1961 Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hurle, D. T. J., Jakeman, E. & Pike, E. R. 1967 On the solution of the Bérnard problem with boundaries of finite conductivity. Proc. Roy. Soc A 296, 469–75.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, H. 1926 The stability of a layer of fluid heated below Phil. Mag. 2, 833–44.Google Scholar
Koschmieder, E. L. 1966 On convection on a uniformly heated plane Beiträge zur Physik der Atmosphäre, 39, 1–11.Google Scholar
Nield, D. A. 1967 The thermohaline Rayleigh—Jeffreys problem J. Fluid Mech. 29, 545–58.Google Scholar
Platzman, G. W. 1965 The spectral dynamics of laminar convection J. Fluid Mech. 23, 481–510.Google Scholar
Rayteigh, LORD 1916 On the convection currents in a horizontal layer of fluid when the higher temperature is on the under side Phil. Mag. 32, 529–46.Google Scholar
SCHLÜTER, A., Lortz, D. & Busse, F. 1965 On the stability of steady finite amplitude convection J. Fluid Mech. 23, 129–44.Google Scholar
Schmidt, E. & Silveston, P. L. 1959 Natural convection in horizontal liquid layers Chem. Engng Prog. Symposium Series, 55, 163–9.Google Scholar
Sparrow, E. M., Goldstein, R. J. & Jonsson, V. K. 1964 Thermal instability in a horizontal fluid layer: effect of boundary conditions and non-linear temperature profile. J. Fluid Mech. 18, 513–28.Google Scholar