Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T03:12:19.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Motion of a particle generated by chemical gradients. Part 2. Electrolytes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

D. C. Prieve
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie–Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
J. L. Anderson
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie–Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
J. P. Ebel
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie–Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
M. E. Lowell
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie–Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213

Abstract

When immersed in a non-uniform electrolyte solution, a rigid charged sphere migrates toward higher or lower concentration of the electrolyte depending on the relative ionic mobilities and the charge borne by the sphere. This motion has a twofold origin: first, a macroscopic electrolyte gradient produces an electric field which acts on the charged sphere (electrophoresis); secondly, the electrolyte gradient polarizes the cloud of counterions surrounding the charged sphere by making the cloud thinner on the high-concentration side (chemiphoresis). In this paper, we compute the terminal velocity of a non-conductive sphere through a slightly non-uniform solution of a symmetrically charged binary electrolyte. The analysis proceeds through an expansion in the small parameter λ (defined as the ratio of the counterion-cloud thickness to the particle radius). Results to O(λ) are presented. The only property of the sphere's surface that affects the velocity is its zeta potential ζ when the electrolyte gradient vanishes; no information concerning the dependence of ζ upon ionic strength is needed. While the chemiphoretic effect always directs the particle toward higher electrolyte concentration, the electrophoretic contribution can move the particle in either direction depending on the sign of βζ, where β is a normalized difference in mobilities between cation and anion of the elecytrolyte; thus particle movement could be directed toward either higher or lower electrolyte concentration depending on the physical properties of the system. With slight algebraic rearrangement, our results are also applicable to conventional electrophoresis (particle motion in an applied electric field) and show excellent agreement with the numerical calculations of O'Brien & White (1978).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1984 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J. L. 1980 Motion of a charged particle in a gradient of electrolyte. Physicochem. Hydrodyn. 1, 51.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. L., Lowell, M. E. & Prieve, D. C. 1982 Motion of a particle generated by chemical gradients. Part I. Non-electrolytes. J. Fluid Mech. 117, 107.Google Scholar
Chew, W. C. & Sen, P. N. 1982 Potential of a sphere in an ionic solution in thin double layer approximations. J. Chem. Phys. 77, 2042.Google Scholar
Derjaguin, B. V., Dukhin, S. S. & Korotkova, A. A. 1961 Diffusiophoresis in electrolyte solutions and its role in the mechanism of film formation from rubber latexes by the method of ionic deposition. Kolloidn. Zh. 23, 53.Google Scholar
Dukhin, S. S. & Derjaguin, B. V. 1974 Electrokinetic phenomena. In Surface and Colloid Science (ed. E. Matijevic), vol. 7. Wiley.
Happel, J. & Brenner, H. 1973 Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics. Noordhoff.
Henry, D. C. 1931 The cataphoresis of suspended particles. Part 1. The equation of cataphoresis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 133, 106.Google Scholar
Morrison, F. A. 1970 Electrophoresis of a particle of arbitrary shape. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 34, 210.Google Scholar
Newman, J. S. 1973 Electrochemical Systems. Prentice-Hall.
O'Brien, R. W. 1983 The solution of the electrokinetic equations for colloidal particles with thin double layers. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 92, 204.Google Scholar
O'Brien, R. W. & Hunter, R. J. 1981 The electrophoretic mobility of large colloidal particles. Can. J. Chem. 59, 1878.Google Scholar
O'Brien, R. W. & White, L. R. 1978 Electrophoretic mobility of a spherical colloidal particle. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. II 72, 1607.Google Scholar
Smith, R. E. & Prieve, D. C. 1982 Accelerated deposition of latex particles onto a rapidly dissolving steel surface. Chem. Engng Sci. 37, 1213.Google Scholar
Woodson, H. H. & Melcher, J. R. 1968 Electromechanical Dynamics (Part II). Wiley.