Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T09:17:44.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modelling installed jet noise due to the scattering of jet instability waves by swept wings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2019

Benshuai Lyu Open the ORCID record for Benshuai Lyu [Opens in a new window]  and
Ann P. Dowling
Benshuai Lyu*
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, CambridgeCB2 1PZ, UK
Ann P. Dowling
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, CambridgeCB2 1PZ, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Jet noise is a significant contributor to aircraft noise, and on modern aircraft it is considerably enhanced at low frequencies by a closely installed wing. Recent research has shown that this noise increase is due to the scattering of jet instability waves by the trailing edge of the wing. Experimentalists have recently shown that noise can be reduced by using wings with swept trailing edges. To understand this mechanism, in this paper, we develop an analytical model to predict the installed jet noise due to the scattering of instability waves by a swept wing. The model is based on the Schwarzschild method and Amiet’s approach is used to obtain the far-field sound. The model can correctly predict both the reduction in installed jet noise and the change to directivity patterns observed in experiments due to the use of swept wings. The agreement between the model and experiment is very good, especially for the directivity at large azimuthal angles. It is found that the principal physical mechanism of sound reduction is due to destructive interference. It is concluded that in order to obtain an effective noise reduction, both the span and the sweep angle of the wing have to be large. Such a model can greatly aid in the design of quieter swept wings and the physical mechanism identified can provide significant insight into developing other innovative noise-reduction strategies.

JFM classification

Instability: Absolute/convective instability Acoustics: Aeroacoustics Acoustics: Jet noise
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 870 , 10 July 2019 , pp. 760 - 783
Copyright
© 2019 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amiet, R. K. 1975 Acoustic radiation from an airfoil in a turbulent stream. J. Sound Vib. 41 (4), 407–420.Google Scholar
Amiet, R. K. 1976 High frequency thin-airfoil theory for subsonic flow. AIAA J. 14 (8), 1076–1082.Google Scholar
Amiet, R. K. 1978 Effect of the incident surface pressure field on noise due to turbulent flow past a trailing edge. J. Sound Vib. 57, 305–306.Google Scholar
Bhat, T. R. S. & Blackner, A. M. 1998 Installed jet noise prediction model for coaxial jets. In Proceedings of 9th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. AIAA Paper 98-79. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.Google Scholar
Bondarenko, M., Hu, Z. & Zhang, X. 2012 Large-eddy simulation of the interaction of a jet with a wing. In Proceedings of 18th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. AIAA Paper 2012-2254. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.Google Scholar
Brown, C. A. 2013 Jet-surface interaction test: far-field noise results. Trans. ASME J. Engng Gas Turbines Power 135 (7), 71201.Google Scholar
Bushell, K. 1975 Measurement and prediction of jet noise in flight. In Proceedings of 2nd Aeroacoustics Conference. AIAA Paper 75-461. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.Google Scholar
Bychkov, O. P. & Faranosov, G. A. 2014 On the possible mechanism of the jet noise intensification near a wing. Acoust. Phys. 60 (6), 633–646.Google Scholar
Casalino, D., Diozzi, F., Sannino, R. & Paonessa, A. 2008 Aircraft noise reduction technologies: a bibliographic review. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 12, 1–17.Google Scholar
Cavalieri, A. V. G., Jordan, P., Wolf, W. & Gervais, Y. 2014 Scattering of wavepackets by a flat plate in the vicinity of a turbulent jet. J. Sound Vib. 333, 6516–6531.Google Scholar
Curle, N. 1955 The influence of solid boundaries upon aerodynamic sound. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 231, 505–514.Google Scholar
Dowling, A. P. & Williams, J. E. F. 1983 Sound and Sources of Sound. Ellis Horwood.Google Scholar
Fisher, M. J., Harper-Bourne, M. & Glegg, S. A. L. 1977 Jet engine noise source location: the polar correlation technique. J. Sound Vib. 51, 23–54.Google Scholar
Glahn, U. V., Groesbeck, D. & Reshotko, M. 1974 Geometry considerations for jet noise shielding with CTOL engine-over-the-wing concept. In Proceedings of 7th Fluids and Plasma Dynamics Conference. AIAA Paper 74-568. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.Google Scholar
Howe, M. S. 1991 Aerodynamic noise of a serrated trailing edge. J. Fluids Struct. 5, 33–45.Google Scholar
Jordan, P. & Colonius, T. 2013 Wave packets and turbulent jet noise. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 45, 173–195.Google Scholar
Lyu, B., Azarpeyvand, M. & Sinayoko, S. 2016 Noise prediction for serrated trailing edges. J. Fluid Mech. 793, 556–588.Google Scholar
Lyu, B. & Dowling, A. 2017 On the mechanism and reduction of installed jet noise. In Proceedings of 23th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. AIAA Paper 2017-3523. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.Google Scholar
Lyu, B. & Dowling, A. 2018 Experimental validation of the hybrid scattering model for installed jet noise. Phys. Fluids 30, 085102.Google Scholar
Lyu, B., Dowling, A. & Naqavi, I. 2017 Prediction of installed jet noise. J. Fluid Mech. 811, 234–268.Google Scholar
Lyu, B. & Dowling, A. P. 2016 Noise prediction for installed jets. In Proceedings of 22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. AIAA Paper 2016-2986. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.Google Scholar
Mead, C. & Strange, P. 1998 Under-wing installation effects on jet noise at sideline. In Proceedings of 4th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. AIAA Paper 98-2207. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.Google Scholar
Moore, A. 2004 A 3D prediction of the wing reflection of aero engine noise. In Proceedings of 10th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. AIAA Paper 2004-2865. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.Google Scholar
Nogueira, P. A. S., Cavalieri, A. V. G. & Jordan, P. 2017 A model problem for sound radiation by an installed jet. J. Sound Vib. 391, 95–115.Google Scholar
Olsen, W. A. & Friedman, R.1973 Noise tests of a model engine-over-the-wing STOL configuration using a multijet nozzle with deflector. NASA Tech. Mem. TM X-2871. NASA Lewis Research Center.Google Scholar
Papamoschou, D. 2010 Prediction of jet noise shielding. In Proceedings of 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. AIAA Paper 2010-653. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronatics.Google Scholar
Pastouchenko, N. N. & Tam, C. K. W. 2007 Installation effects on the flow and noise of wing mounted jets. AIAA J. 45 (12), 2851–2860.Google Scholar
Pepper, C. B., Nascarella, M. A. & Kendall, R. J. 2003 A review of the effects of aircraft noise on wildlife and humans, current control mechanisms, and the need for further study. Environ. Manage. 32, 418–432.Google Scholar
Piantanida, S., Jaunet, V., Huber, J., Wolf, W. R., Jordan, P. & Cavalieri, A. V. G. 2016 Scattering of turbulent-jet wavepackets by a swept trailing edge. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 140 (6), 4350–4359.Google Scholar
Reshotko, M. & Friedman, R.1973 Acoustic investigation of the engine-over-the-wing concept using a d-shaped nozzle. NASA Tech. Mem. TM X-71419. NASA Lewis Research Center.Google Scholar
Reshotko, M., Olsen, W. A. & Dorsch, R. G.1972a Preliminary noise tests of the engine-over-the-wing concept I. $30^{\circ }$ – $60^{\circ }$ flat position. NASA Tech. Mem. TM X-68032. NASA Lewis Research Center.Google Scholar
Reshotko, M., Olsen, W. A. & Dorsch, R. G.1972b Preliminary noise tests of the engine-over-the-wing concept II. $10^{\circ }$ – $20^{\circ }$ flat position. NASA Tech. Mem. TM X-68104. NASA Lewis Research Center.Google Scholar
Roger, M. & Moreau, S. 2005 Back-scattering correction and further extensions of Amiet’s trailing-edge noise model. Part 1: theory. J. Sound Vib. 286 (3), 477–506.Google Scholar
Semiletov, V. A., Yakovlev, P. G., Karabasov, S. A., Faranosov, G. A. & Kopiev, V. F. 2016 Jet and jet-wing noise modelling based on the CABARET MILES flow solver and the Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings method. Intl J. Aeroacoust. 15 (6–7), 631–645.Google Scholar
Shearin, J. G.1983 Investigation of jet-installation noise sources under static conditions. NASA Tech. Rep. 2181.Google Scholar
Tam, C. K. W. & Viswanathan, K. 2008 The sources of jet noise: experimental evidence. J. Fluid Mech. 615, 253–292.Google Scholar
Vera, J., Self, R. H. & Kingan, M. J. 2015 The prediction of the radiated pressure spectrum produced by jet-wing interaction. In Proceedings of 21st AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustic Conference. AIAA Paper 2015-2216. American Institute of Aeroacoustic and Astronautics.Google Scholar
Wang, M. 1981 Wing effect on jet noise propagation. J. Aircraft 18, 295–302.Google Scholar
Way, D. & Turner, B. 1980 Model tests demonstrating under-wing installation effects on engine exhaust noise. In Proceedings of 6th Aeroacoustics Conference. AIAA Paper 80-1048. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.Google Scholar