Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T00:29:44.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanisms of stationary cross-flow instability growth and breakdown induced by forward-facing steps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

Jenna L. Eppink Open the ORCID record for Jenna L. Eppink [Opens in a new window]
Jenna L. Eppink*
Affiliation:
Flow Physics and Control Branch, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23681, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An experimental study is performed to determine the mechanisms by which a forward-facing step impacts the growth and breakdown to turbulence of the stationary cross-flow instability. Particle image velocimetry measurements are obtained in the boundary layer of a $30^{\circ }$ swept flat plate with a pressure body. Step heights range from 53 % to 71 % of the boundary-layer thickness. The critical step height is approximately 60 % of the boundary-layer thickness for the current study, although it is also shown that the critical step height depends on the initial amplitude of the stationary cross-flow vortices. For the critical cases, the stationary cross-flow amplitude grows sharply downstream of the step, decays for a short region and then grows again. The initial growth region is linear, and can be explained primarily through the impact of the step on the mean flow. Namely, the step causes abrupt changes to the mean flow, resulting in large values of wall-normal shear, as well as highly inflectional profiles, due to either cross-flow reversal, separation or both. These inflectional profiles are highly unstable for the stationary cross-flow. Additionally, the reversed flow regions are significantly modulated by the stationary cross-flow vortices. The second region of growth occurs due to the stationary-cross-flow-induced modulation of the shear layer, which leads to multiple smaller wavelength streamwise vortices. High-frequency fluctuations indicate that the unsteady transition mechanism for the critical cases relates to the shedding of vortices downstream of reattachment of the modulated separated regions.

JFM classification

Boundary Layers: Boundary layer stability Instability: Transition to turbulence
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 897 , 25 August 2020 , A15
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
As a work owned by the United States Government, this Contribution is not subject to copyright within the United States. Outside of the United States, Cambridge University Press is the non-exclusively licensed publisher of the Contribution.
Copyright
© United States Government as Represented by the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration outside of the United States of America, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boghosian, M. E. & Cassel, K. W. 2016 On the origins of vortex shedding in two-dimensional incompressible flows. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 30 (6), 511–527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Q., Adrian, R. J., Zhong, Q., Li, D. & Wang, X. 2014 Experimental study on the role of spanwise vorticity and vortex filaments in the outer region of open-channel flow. J. Hydraul. Res. 52 (4), 476–489.Google Scholar
Chen, H., Li, D., Bai, R. & Wang, X. 2018 Comparison of swirling strengths derived from two- and three-dimensional velocity fields in channel flow. AIP Adv. 8 (5), 055302.Google Scholar
Cherry, N. J., Hillier, R. & Latour, M. E. M. P. 1984 Unsteady measurements in a separated and reattaching flow. J. Fluid Mech. 144, 13–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouch, J. D., Kosorygin, V. S. & Ng, L. L. 2006 Modeling the effects of steps on boundary-layer transition. In IUTAM Symposium on Laminar–Turbulent Transition, pp. 37–44. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, A., Bender, A. M., Korntheuer, A. J., Westphal, R. V., McKeon, B. J., Gerashchenko, S., Rohe, W. & Dale, G. 2010 Step excrescence effects for manufacturing tolerances on laminar flow wings. AIAA Paper 2010-375.Google Scholar
Duncan, G. T. Jr., Crawford, B. K. & Saric, W. S. 2013 Effects of step excrescences on swept-wing transition. AIAA Paper 2013-2412.Google Scholar
Duncan, G. T. Jr., Crawford, B. K., Tufts, M. W., Saric, W. S. & Reed, H. L. 2014 Effects of step excrescences on a swept wing in a low-disturbance wind tunnel. AIAA Paper 2014-0910.Google Scholar
Eppink, J. L. 2017 Stereo particle image velocimetry measurements of transition downstream of a foward-facing step in a swept-wing boundary layer. AIAA Paper 2017-0306.Google Scholar
Eppink, J. L. 2018 The effect of forward-facing steps on stationary crossflow instability growth and breakdown. AIAA Paper 2018-0817.Google Scholar
Eppink, J. L. 2019 Validation and uncertainty analysis of stereo time-resolved piv measurements for boundary-layer transition research. AIAA Paper 2019-1825.Google Scholar
Eppink, J. L., Wlezien, R. W., King, R. A. & Choudhari, M. 2018 Interaction of a backward-facing step and crossflow instabilities in boundary-layer transition. AIAA J. 56 (2), 497–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hosseinverdi, S. & Fasel, H. F. 2016 Direct numerical simulations of laminar-to-turbulent transition in laminar separation bubbles in three-dimensional boundary-layer. AIAA Paper 2016-3793.Google Scholar
Kiya, M. & Sasaki, K. 1983 Structure of a turbulent separation bubble. J. Fluid Mech. 137, 83–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiya, M. & Sasaki, K. 1985 Structure of large-scale vortices and unsteady reverse flow in the reattaching zone of a turbulent separation bubble. J. Fluid Mech. 154, 463–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malik, M. R., Crouch, J. D., Saric, W. S., Lin, J. C. & Whalen, E. A. 2016 Application of drag reduction techniques to transport aircraft. In Encyclopedia of Aerospace Engineering, pp. 1–10. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
Malik, M. R., Li, F., Choudhari, M. M. & Chang, C.-L. 1999 Secondary instability of crossflow vortices and swept-wing boundary-layer transition. J. Fluid Mech. 399, 85–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perraud, J. & Seraudie, A. 2000 Effects of steps and gaps on 2D and 3D transition. In European Congress on Comp. Methods in Applied Science and Eng., ECCOMAS, pp. 11–14.Google Scholar
Rius Vidales, A. F., Kotsonis, M., Antunes, A. P. & Cosin, R. 2018 Effect of two-dimensional surface irregularities on swept wing transition: forward facing steps. AIAA Paper 2018-3075.Google Scholar
Saric, W. S. & Reshotko, E. 1998 Review of flow quality issues in wind tunnel testing. AIAA Paper 1998-2613.Google Scholar
Tomkins, C. D. & Adrian, R. J. 2003 Spanwise structure and scale growth in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 490, 37–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufts, M. W., Reed, H. L., Crawford, B. K., Duncan, G. T. Jr. & Saric, W. S. 2017 Computational investigation of step excrescence sensitivity in a swept-wing boundary layer. J. Aircraft 54 (2), 602–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, E. B. & Saric, W. S. 2005 Secondary instability of crossflow vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 525 (1), 275–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wörner, A., Rist, U. & Wagner, S. 2002 Influence of humps and steps on the stability characteristics of a 2D laminar boundary layer. AIAA Paper 2002-0139.Google Scholar
Wu, Y. & Christensen, K. T. 2006 Population trends of spanwise vortices in wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 568, 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, J., Adrian, R. J., Balachandar, S. & Kendall, T. M. 1999 Mechanisms for generating coherent packets of hairpin vortices in channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 387, 353–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eppink supplementary movie 1

U'-disturbance development downstream of the step for the 1.4 mm FFS with 4 layers of DREs

Download Eppink supplementary movie 1(Video)
Video 5.2 MB

Eppink supplementary movie 2

U'-disturbance development downstream of the step for the 1.4 mm FFS.

Download Eppink supplementary movie 2(Video)
Video 3.7 MB

Eppink supplementary movie 3

U'-disturbance development downstream of the step for the 1.52 mm FFS.

Download Eppink supplementary movie 3(Video)
Video 7.6 MB

Eppink supplementary movie 4

U'-disturbance development downstream of the step for the 1.7 mm FFS.

Download Eppink supplementary movie 4(Video)
Video 6.2 MB

Eppink supplementary movie 5

U'-disturbance development for the no-step case.

Download Eppink supplementary movie 5(Video)
Video 2.2 MB