Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T07:40:26.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Local similarity solutions and their limitations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2006

H. K. Moffatt  and
B. R. Duffy
H. K. Moffatt
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, University of Bristol, England
B. R. Duffy
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, University of Bristol, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two problems exhibiting breakdown in local similarity solutions are discussed, and the appropriate asymptotic form of the exact solution is determined in each case. The first problem is the very elementary problem of pressure driven flow along a duct whose cross-section has a sharp corner of angle 2α. When 2α < ½π, a local similarity solution is valid, whereas, when 2α > ½π, the solution near the corner depends on the global geometry of the cross-section. The transitional behaviour when 2α = ½π is determined.

The second problem concerns low-Reynolds-number flow in the wedge-shaped region |θ| < α when either a normal velocity proportional to distance from the vertex is imposed on both boundaries, or a finite flux 2Q is introduced or extracted at the vertex (the Jeffery–Hamel problem). It is shown that the similarity solution in either case is valid only when 2α < 2αc ≈ 257·5°; a modified problem is solved exactly revealing the behaviour when α > αc, and the transitional behaviour when α = αc (when the similarity solutions become infinite everywhere). An interesting conclusion for the Jeffery–Hamel problem is that when α > αc, inertia forces are of dominant importance throughout the flow field no matter how small the source Reynolds number 2Q/ν may be.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 96 , Issue 2 , 29 January 1980 , pp. 299 - 313
Copyright
© 1980 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, R. F. & Biggin, C. M. 1974 Longitudinal flow of a lenticular liquid filament down an inclined plane. Phys. Fluids 17, 287–291.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1956 On steady laminar flow with closed streamlines at large Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 1, 177–190.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1967 Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
Collins, W. M. & Dennis, S. C. R. 1976 Viscous eddies near a 90° and a 45° corner in flow through a curved tube of triangular cross-section. J. Fluid Mech. 76, 417–432.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, L. E. 1961 On corner eddies in plane inviscid shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 11, 400–406.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, L. E. 1962 Laminar flow in symmetrical channels with slightly curved walls. I. On the Jeffery—Hamel solutions for flow between plane walls. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 267, 119–138.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, L. E. 1973 On a theory of laminar flow in channels of a certain class. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 73, 361–390.Google Scholar
Hardy, G. H. 1902 On the zeroes of the integral function x—sin x = Σ1∞ (−1)n−1x2n+1/(2n + 1)! Messenger of Math. 31, 161–165.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, D. J. & Sherwood, J. D. 1980 Streamline patterns and eddies in low-Reynolds-number flow. J. Fluid Mech. 96, 315.Google Scholar
Moffatt, H. K. 1964a Viscous and resistive eddies near a sharp corner. J. Fluid Mech. 18, 1–18.Google Scholar
Moffatt, H. K. 1964b Viscous eddies near a sharp corner. Arch. Mech. Stosowanej 16, 365–372.Google Scholar
Sternberg, E. & Koiter, W. T. 1958 The wedge under a concentrated couple: a paradox in the two-dimensional theory of elasticity. J. Appl. Mech. 25, 575–581.Google Scholar
Tranter, C. J. 1948 The use of the Mellin transform in finding the stress distribution in an infinite wedge. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 1, 125–130.Google Scholar