Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:22:34.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The linear response of turbulent flow to a volume force: comparison between eddy-viscosity model and DNS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2016

S. Russo  and
P. Luchini
S. Russo*
Affiliation:
DICMAPI, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, 80138 Napoli, Italy
P. Luchini
Affiliation:
DIIN, Università degli Studi di Salerno, 84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We identify a benchmark problem simple enough that it can be solved both by an eddy-viscosity model and by direct numerical simulation: this is the linear response of a turbulent flow’s mean-velocity profile to an external volume force. An example of such a force was found in a study of the perturbation induced by bottom topography by Luchini & Charru (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 656, 2010, pp. 337–341). On the other hand, a modification of the method by Quadrio & Luchini (Proceedings of the IX European Turbulence Conference, Southampton, UK, 2002, pp. 715–718) and Luchini et al. (Phys. Fluids, vol. 18, 2006, 121702) to compute the linear impulse response of a wall-bounded turbulent flow allows the response to a volume force to be computed directly. The comparison exhibits significant differences and suggests that there might be fundamental obstacles to designing an eddy-viscosity model that provides the correct result.

JFM classification

Boundary Layers: Boundary Layers Low-Reynolds-number flows: Low-Reynolds-number flows Turbulent Flows: Turbulent Flows
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 790 , 10 March 2016 , pp. 104 - 127
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2016 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, J. 1979 A nonlinear boundary layers analysis for turbulent flow over a solid wavy surface. University of Illinois, Department of Chemical Engineering, Urbana/IL, USA.Google Scholar
del Alamo, J. C. & Jimenez, J. 2006 Linear energy amplification in turbulent channels. J. Fluid Mech. 559, 205–213.Google Scholar
Cess, R. D.1958 A survey of the literature on heat transfer in turbulent tube flow. Rep. 8-0529-R24, Westinghouse Research.Google Scholar
Frederick, K. A. & Hanratty, T. J. 1988 Velocity measurements for a turbulent non separated flow over solid waves. Exp. Fluids 6, 477–486.Google Scholar
Frohnapfel, B., Hasegawa, Y. & Quadrio, M. 2012 Money versus time: evaluation of flow control in terms of energy consumption and convenience. J. Fluid Mech. 700, 406–418.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. 1994 Time Series Analysis, 1st edn. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Y., Quadrio, M. & Frohnapfel, B. 2014 Numerical simulation of turbulent duct flows with constant power input. J. Fluid Mech. 750, 191–209.Google Scholar
Henn, D. S. & Sykes, R. I. 1999 Large-eddy simulation of flow over wavy surfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 383, 75–112.Google Scholar
Hinze, J. O. 1975 Turbulence. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hœpffner, J. & Fukagata, K. 2009 Pumping or drag reduction. J. Fluid Mech. 635, 171–187.Google Scholar
Hoyas, S. & Jimenez, J. 2006 Scaling of the velocity fluctuations in turbulent channels up to $Re_{{\it\tau}}=2003$ . Phys. Fluids 18, 011702.Google Scholar
Hussain, A. K. M. F. & Reynolds, W. C. 1970 The mechanics of an organized wave in turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 41 (2), 241–258.Google Scholar
Jackson, P. S. & Hunt, J. C. R. 1975 Turbulent wind flow over a low hill. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 101, 929–955.Google Scholar
Jimenez, J., Uhlmann, M., Pinelli, A. & Kawahara, G. 2001 Turbulent shear flow over active and passive porous surfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 442, 89–117.Google Scholar
Luchini, P. 2008 Acoustic streaming and lower-than-laminar drag in controlled channel flow. In Progress in Industrial Mathematics at ECMI 2006, vol. 12, pp. 169–177. Springer.Google Scholar
Luchini, P. & Charru, F. 2010a Consistent section-averaged equations of quasi-one-dimensional laminar flow. J. Fluid Mech. 656, 337–341.Google Scholar
Luchini, P. & Charru, F. 2010b The phase lead of shear stress in shallow-water flow over a perturbed bottom. J. Fluid Mech. 665, 516–539.Google Scholar
Luchini, P., Quadrio, M. & Zuccher, S. 2006 The phase-locked mean impulse response of a turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 18, 121702.Google Scholar
McLean, J. W. 1983 Computation of turbulent flow over a moving wavy boundary. Phys. Fluids 26, 2065–2073.Google Scholar
Meketon, M. S. & Schmeiser, B. 1984 Overlapping batch means: something for nothing? In Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 227–230. IEEE Press.Google Scholar
Myong, H. K. & Kasagi, N. 1990 New approach to the improvement of – turbulence model for wall-bounded shear flows. JSME Intl J. 33 (1), 63–72.Google Scholar
Kasagi, N., Hasegawa, Y. & Fukagata, K. 2009 Towards cost-effective control of wall turbulence for skin-friction drag reduction. In Advances in Turbulence XII, vol. 132, pp. 189–200. Springer.Google Scholar
Nezu, I. & Rodi, W. 1986 Open-channel flow measurements with a laser Doppler anemometer. J. Hydraul. Engng 112, 335–355.Google Scholar
Patel, V. C., Rodi, W. & Scheuerer, G. 1985 Turbulence models for near-wall and low Reynolds number flows – A review. AIAA J. 23 (9), 1308–1319.Google Scholar
Pope, S. B. 2011 Turbulence Modeling for CFD, 11th edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Quadrio, M. & Luchini, P. 2002 The linear response of turbulent channel flow. In Proceedings of the IX European Turbulence Conference, Southampton, UK, pp. 715–718.Google Scholar
Quadrio, M. & Luchini, P. 2006 A low-cost parallel implementation of direct numerical simulation of wall turbulence. J. Comput. Phys. 211 (2), 551–571.Google Scholar
Quadrio, M. & Ricco, P. 2011 The laminar generalized Stokes layer and turbulent drag reduction. J. Fluid Mech. 667, 135–157.Google Scholar
Reynolds, W. C. & Hussain, A. K. M. F. 1972 The mechanics of an organized wave in turbulent shear flow. Part 3. Theoretical models and comparisons with experiments. J. Fluid Mech. 54, 263–288.Google Scholar
Sarkar, A. & So, R. M. C. 1997 A critical evaluation of near-wall two-equation models against direct numerical simulation data. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 18 (2), 197–208.Google Scholar
Wilcox, D. C. 1993 Turbulence Modeling for CFD, 1st edn. DCW Industries, Inc.Google Scholar
Zilker, D. P., Cook, G. W. & Hanratty, T. J. 1977 Influence of the amplitude of a solid wavy wall on a turbulent flow. Part 1. Non-separated flows. J. Fluid Mech. 82, 29–51.Google Scholar