Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T09:00:30.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The ‘Hurst phenomenon’ in grid turbulence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2006

K. N. Helland
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mechanics and Engineering Sciences, University of California, La Jolla
C. W. Van Atta
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mechanics and Engineering Sciences, University of California, La Jolla

Abstract

Measurements of the statistical property called the ‘rescaled range’ in grid-generated turbulence exhibit a Hurst coefficient H = 0·5 for 43 < UT/M < 1850, where M/U is a characteristic time scale associated with the grid size M and mean velocity U. Theory predicts that H = 0·5 for independence of two observations separated by a time interval T, and the deviation from H = 0·5 is referred to as the ‘Hurst phenomenon’. The rescaled range obtained for grid turbulence contains an initial region UT/M < 43 of large H, approaching 1·0, corresponding approximately to the usual region of a finite non-zero autocorrelation of turbulent velocity fluctuations. For UT/M > 1850 the rescaled range breaks from H = 0·5 and rises at a significantly faster rate, H = 0·7-0·8, implying a long-term dependence or possibly non-stationarity at long times. The measured autocorrelations remain indistinguishable from zero for UT/M > 20. The break in the trend H = 0·5 is probably caused by motions on scales comparable to characteristic time scales of the wind-tunnel circulation. Rescaled-range analysis is a powerful statistical tool for determining the time scale separating the grid turbulence from the background wind-tunnel motions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1978 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anis, A. A. & Lloyd, E. H. 1953 On the range of partial sums of a finite number of independent normal variates. Biometrika 40, 35.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1953 The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence. Cambridge University Press.
Comte-Bellot, G. & Corrsin, S. 1971 Simple Eulerian time correlation of full- and narrowband velocity signals in grid-generated, ‘isotropic’ turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 48, 273.Google Scholar
Feller, W. 1951 The asymptotic distribution of the range of sums of independent random variables. Ann. Math. Statist. 22, 427.Google Scholar
Fischer, H. B. 1973 A possible explanation for Nordin, McQuivey and Mejia's observation of the Hurst phenomenon in turbulence. Water Resources Res. 9, 492.Google Scholar
Frenkiel, F. N. & Klebanoff, P. S. 1967 Higher-order correlations in a turbulent field. Phys. Fluids, 10, 507.Google Scholar
Hurst, H. E. 1951 Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs. Trans. A.S.C.E. 116, 770.Google Scholar
KLEMEšS, V. 1974 The Hurst phenomenon: a puzzle?. Water Resources Res. 10, 675.Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. H. 1967 Stochastic reservoir theory. Adv. in Hydrosci. 4, 281.Google Scholar
Mandelbrot, B. B. 1965 Une classe de procèssus stochastiques homothétiques à sui; application à la loi climatologique de H. E. Hurst. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 260, 3274.Google Scholar
Mandelbrot, B. B. 1975 Limit theorems on the self-normalized range for weakly and strongly dependent processes. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie verw. Gebiete 31, 271.Google Scholar
Mandelbrot, B. B. & Van ness, J. W. 1968 Fractional Brownian motions, fractional noises and applications. S.I.A.M. Rev. 4, 422.Google Scholar
Mandelbrot, B. B. & Wallis, J. R. 1969a Computer experiments with fractional Gaussian noises. 1, Averages and variances; 2, Rescaled ranges and spectra; 3, Mathematical appendix. Water Resources Res. 5, 228.Google Scholar
Mandelbrot, B. B. & Wallis, J. R. 1969b Some long-run properties of geophysical records. Water Resources Res. 5, 321.Google Scholar
Nordin, C. F., Mcquivey, R. S. & Mejia, J. M. 1972 Hurst phenomenon in turbulence. Water Resources Res. 8, 1480.Google Scholar
Nordin, C. F., Mcquivey, R. S. & Mejia, J. M. 1973 Reply. Water Resources Res. 9, 494.Google Scholar
Van Atta, C. W. & Chen, W. Y. 1968 Correlation measurements in grid turbulence using digital harmonic analysis. J. Fluid Mech. 34, 497.Google Scholar
Van Atta, C. W. & Chen, W. Y. 1969 Correlation measurements in turbulence using digital Fourier analysis. Phys. Fluids Suppl. 12, II 264.Google Scholar