Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-c4bhq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-15T05:47:15.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Formation process of a two-dimensional starting jet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2025

Haojun Zheng Open the ORCID record for Haojun Zheng [Opens in a new window] ,
Lei Gao Open the ORCID record for Lei Gao [Opens in a new window]  and
Simon C.M. Yu Open the ORCID record for Simon C.M. Yu [Opens in a new window]
Haojun Zheng
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical and Aviation Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, PR China
Lei Gao*
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, PR China
Simon C.M. Yu
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical and Aviation Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, PR China
*
Corresponding author: Lei Gao, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The formation process of a vortex pair generated by a two-dimensional starting jet has been investigated numerically over a range of Reynolds numbers from 500 to 2000. The effects of stroke ratio and nozzle configuration are examined. Only a single vortex pair can be observed in the vorticity field generated by small stroke ratios less than 10 while the leading vortex pair formed by larger stroke ratios eventually disconnects from the trailing jet. The formation numbers (13.6 and 9.3) for a straight nozzle and an orifice nozzle have been identified by the circulation criterion and they are further analysed by four other criteria. Using the contraction coefficient, formation numbers can be transformed into a universal value at about 16.5 for both nozzles. The effect of Reynolds number on the formation number is found to be within 12 % for parallel flow cases but it will increase up to 27 % for non-parallel flow cases due to shear-layer instability. A modified contraction-based slug model is proposed, and it can accurately predict the total invariants (e.g. circulation, hydrodynamic impulse and kinetic energy) shedding from the nozzle edge. Analytical estimation of the formation number is further conducted by matching the predicted total invariants to the Pierrehumbert model of steady vortex pairs. By assuming that pinch-off starts when the vortex pair achieves the steady state, two analytical models are proposed in terms of vortex impulse and translational velocity. The latter appears to be more appropriate to predict the formation number for two-dimensional flows.

JFM classification

Vortex Flows: Vortex dynamics Wakes/Jets: Jets
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 1007 , 25 March 2025 , A11
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Afanasyev, Y.D. 2006 Formation of vortex dipoles. Phys. Fluids 18 (3), 037103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ai, J.J., Yu, S.C.M., Law, A.W.K. & Chua, L.P. 2005 Vortex dynamics in starting square water jets. Phys. Fluids 17 (1), 014106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, J.J. & Naitoh, T. 2005 Experimental study of the production of vortex rings using a variable diameter orifice. Phys. Fluids 17 (6), 061701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, V.I. 1965 Conditions for nonlinear stability of stationary plane curvilinear flows of an ideal fluid. Sov. Math. Dokl. 162, 773–777.Google Scholar
Baskaran, M. & Mulleners, K. 2022 Lagrangian analysis of bio-inspired vortex ring formation. Flow 2, E16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, G.K. 1967 An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T.B. 1976 The alliance of practical and analytical insights into the nonlinear problems of fluid mechanics. In Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 503, pp. 8–29. Springer.Google Scholar
Bi, X. & Zhu, Q. 2020 Pulsed-jet propulsion via shape deformation of an axisymmetric swimmer. Phys. Fluids 32 (8), 081902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabiri, J.O. & Gharib, M. 2004 Delay of vortex ring pinchoff by an imposed bulk counterflow. Phys. Fluids 16 (4), L28–L30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danaila, I. & Helie, J. 2008 Numerical simulation of the postformation evolution of a laminar vortex ring. Phys. Fluids 20 (7), 073602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Didden, N. 1979 On the formation of vortex rings: rolling-up and production of circulation. J. Appl. Math. Phys. 30 (1), 101–116.Google Scholar
Domenichini, F. 2011 Three-dimensional impulsive vortex formation from slender orifices. J. Fluid Mech. 666, 506–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández, J.J.P. & Sesterhenn, J. 2017 Compressible starting jet: pinch-off and vortex ring–trailing jet interaction. J. Fluid Mech. 817, 560–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernando, J.N. & Rival, D.E. 2016 Reynolds-number scaling of vortex pinch-off on low-aspect-ratio propulsors. J. Fluid Mech. 799, R3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flierl, G.R. & Morrison, P.J. 2011 Hamiltonian–Dirac simulated annealing: application to the calculation of vortex states. Phys. D: Nonlinear Phenom. 240 (2), 212–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, L.E. 1972 Examples of steady vortex rings of small cross-section in an ideal fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 51 (1), 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, L. & Yu, S.C.M. 2012 Development of the trailing shear layer in a starting jet during pinch-off. J. Fluid Mech. 700, 382–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, L. & Yu, S.C.M. 2016 a Formation of leading vortex pair in two-dimensional starting jets. AIAA J. 54 (4), 1364–1369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, L. & Yu, S.C.M. 2016 b Vortex ring formation in starting forced plumes with negative and positive buoyancy. Phys. Fluids 28 (11), 113601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, L., Yu, S.C.M., Ai, J.J. & Law, A.W.K. 2008 Circulation and energy of the leading vortex ring in a gravity-driven starting jet. Phys. Fluids 20 (9), 093604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gharib, M., Rambod, E. & Shariff, K. 1998 A universal time scale for vortex ring formation. J. Fluid Mech. 360, 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplanski, F.B. & Rudi, Y.A. 2005 A model for the formation of “optimal” vortex rings taking into account viscosity. Phys. Fluids 17 (8), 087101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieg, M. & Mohseni, K. 2013 Modelling circulation, impulse and kinetic energy of starting jets with non-zero radial velocity. J. Fluid Mech. 719, 488–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieg, M. & Mohseni, K. 2021 A new kinematic criterion for vortex ring pinch-off. Phys. Fluids 33 (3), 037120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, P.S. 2005 An over-pressure correction to the slug model for vortex ring circulation. J. Fluid Mech. 545, 427–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, J.M. & Dawson, J.R. 2013 The formation of turbulent vortex rings by synthetic jets. Phys. Fluids 25 (10), 105113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leweke, T., Le Dizes, S. & Williamson, C.H.K. 2016 Dynamics and instabilities of vortex pairs. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 48 (1), 507–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, T.T. & Nickels, T.B. 1995 Vortex Rings. Springer.Google Scholar
Limbourg, R. & Nedić, J. 2021 a An extended model for orifice starting jets. Phys. Fluids 33 (6), 067109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limbourg, R. & Nedić, J. 2021 b An extension to the universal time scale for vortex ring formation. J. Fluid Mech. 915, A46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limbourg, R. & Nedić, J. 2021 c Formation of an orifice-generated vortex ring. J. Fluid Mech. 913, A29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limbourg, R. & Nedić, J. 2021 d On the asymptotic matching procedure predicting the formation number. Phys. Fluids 33 (11), 117103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linden, P.F. & Turner, J.S. 2001 The formation of ‘optimal’ vortex rings, and the efficiency of propulsion devices. J. Fluid Mech. 427, 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohseni, K. 2001 Statistical equilibrium theory for axisymmetric flows: Kelvin’s variational principle and an explanation for the vortex ring pinch-off process. Phys. Fluids 13 (7), 1924–1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohseni, K. & Gharib, M. 1998 A model for universal time scale of vortex ring formation. Phys. Fluids 10 (10), 2436–2438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norbury, J. 1973 A family of steady vortex rings. J. Fluid Mech. 57 (3), 417–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Farrell, C. & Dabiri, J.O. 2012 Perturbation response and pinch-off of vortex rings and dipoles. J. Fluid Mech. 704, 280–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedrizzetti, G. 2010 Vortex formation out of two-dimensional orifices. J. Fluid Mech. 655, 198–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, R.T. 1980 A family of steady, translating vortex pairs with distributed vorticity. J. Fluid Mech. 99 (1), 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, M., Katija, K. & Dabiri, J.O. 2009 Circulation generation and vortex ring formation by conic nozzles. J. Fluids Engng 131 (9), 091204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, M., Rambod, E. & Gharib, M. 1998 Circulation and formation number of laminar vortex rings. J. Fluid Mech. 376, 297–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadri, V. & Krueger, P.S. 2016 Pinch-off of axisymmetric vortex pairs in the limit of vanishing vortex line curvature. Phys. Fluids 28 (7), 071701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffman, P.G. 1978 The number of waves on unstable vortex rings. J. Fluid Mech. 84 (4), 625–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffman, P.G. 1992 Vortex Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sau, R. & Mahesh, K. 2007 Passive scalar mixing in vortex rings. J. Fluid Mech. 582, 449–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlueter-Kuck, K. & Dabiri, J.O. 2016 Pressure evolution in the shear layer of forming vortex rings. Phys. Rev. Fluids 1 (1), 012501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, T.G. 1990 A general method for finding extremal states of Hamiltonian dynamical systems, with applications to perfect fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 213 (1), 573–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shusser, M. & Gharib, M. 2000 Energy and velocity of a forming vortex ring. Phys. Fluids 12 (3), 618–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinfurth, B. & Weiss, J. 2020 Vortex rings produced by non-parallel planar starting jets. J. Fluid Mech. 903, A16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, W. 1880 Vortex statics. Phil. Mag. 10 (60), 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turkington, B. 1983 On steady vortex flow in two dimensions. I. Commun. Part. Diff. Equ. 8 (9), 999–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallis, G.K., Carnevale, G.F. & Young, W.R. 1989 Extremal energy properties and construction of stable solutions of the Euler equations. J. Fluid Mech. 207, 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J.Z., Ma, H.Y. & Zhou, M.D. 2007 Vorticity and Vortex Dynamics. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Zhao, W., Frankel, S.H. & Mongeau, L.G. 2000 Effects of trailing jet instability on vortex ring formation. Phys. Fluids 12 (3), 589–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, J., Zhang, G., Gao, L. & Yu, S.C.M. 2023 a The circulation growth of non-impulsive starting jet. Phys. Fluids 35 (5), 057102.Google Scholar
Zhu, J., Zhang, G., Gao, L. & Yu, S.C.M. 2023 b Vortex ring formation process in starting jets with uniform background co-and counter-flow. J. Fluid Mech. 968, A26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar