Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T15:08:52.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The formation and evolution of stratification during transient mixing ventilation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

ANDREA S. KUESTERS  and
ANDREW W. WOODS
ANDREA S. KUESTERS
Affiliation:
BP Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 OEZ, UK
ANDREW W. WOODS*
Affiliation:
BP Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 OEZ, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigate the buoyancy-driven ventilation of an enclosed volume of buoyant fluid, which is connected to the exterior through two openings at the top of the enclosure. An exchange flow becomes established, with outflow through one opening being matched by an equal and opposite inflow through the other vent. The inflowing flux of dense exterior fluid develops a turbulent buoyant plume, which mixes with the interior fluid as it cascades to the base of the fluid volume. An upward return flow gradually stratifies the confined volume of fluid, with a first front of relatively dense plume fluid advancing to the top of the space. Initially, the exchange flow is steady, but as the first front rises above the inflow opening, the flow rate wanes. The initial development of the exchange flow and interior stratification follows the classical filling box work of Baines & Turner (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 37, 1969, p. 51), with a plume of constant buoyancy flux. Once the first front exits the space, the volume flux rapidly asymptotes to the form Q = Q0(τ/(τ+t)) from the initial value Q0, where τ is the buoyancy-driven draining time, based on the initial density contrast with the environment. The vertical structure of the interior density stratification asymptotes to a profile of constant shape whose amplitude decays in time as (τ/(τ+t))2, and we identify conditions under which the vertical variation in density is comparable to the difference between mean interior density and the exterior. This generalises the analysis presented by Linden, Lane-Serff & Smeed (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 212, 1990, p. 309), who assumed that the interior fluid is well mixed. New laboratory experiments of the process are shown to be consistent with our predictions of the evolution of the flow, the interior stratification and the migration of contaminants. We also develop our analysis for situations where there are multiple stacks and show how this improves the mixing efficiency for a given ventilation flow. The model has relevance for the design of transient mixing ventilation in a building, especially when the effect of vertical stratification is important for ensuring thermal comfort.

JFM classification

Convection: Plumes/thermals
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 670 , 10 March 2011 , pp. 66 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baines, W. & Turner, J. 1969 Turbulent buoyant convection from a source in a confined region. J. Fluid Mech. 37 (1), 51–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolster, D. T. & Linden, P. F. 2007 Contaminants in ventilated filling boxed. J. Fluid Mech. 591, 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolster, D. T., Maillard, A. & Linden, P. 2008 The response of natural displacement ventilation to time-varying heat sources. Energy Build. 40, 2099–2110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulard, T. & Baille, A. 1995 Modeling of air exchange rate in a greenhouse equipped with continuous roof vents. J. Agric. Engng Res. 61, 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bower, D. J., Caulfield, C. P., Fitzgerald, S. D. & Woods, A. W. 2008 Transient ventilation dynamics following a change in strength of a point source of heat. J. Fluid Mech. 614, 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caulfield, C. P. & Woods, A. W. 1998 Turbulent gravitational convection from a point source in a non-uniformly stratified environment. J. Fluid Mech. 360, 229–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caulfield, C. P. & Woods, A. W. 2002 The mixing in a room by a localized finite-mass-flux source of buoyancy. J. Fluid Mech. 471, 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chenvidyakarn, T. & Woods, A. W. 2005 Multiple steady states in stack ventilation. Build. Environ. 40, 399–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, Y.-H. & Etheridge, D. W. 2004 Experimental technique to determine unsteady flow in natural ventilation stacks at model scale. J. Wind Engng Ind. Aerodyn. 92, 291–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, S. D. & Woods, A. W. 2007 On the transition from displacement to mixing ventilation with a localised heat source. Build. Environ. 42 (6), 2210–2217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, S. D. & Woods, A. W. 2008 The influence of stacks on flow patterns and stratification associated with natural ventilation. Build. Environ. 43, 1719–1733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, M. R. & Caulfield, C. P. 2006 Natural ventilation in interconnected chambers. J. Fluid Mech. 564, 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germeles, A. E. 1975 Forced plumes and mixing of liquids in tanks. J. Fluid Mech. 71, 601–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladstone, L. & Woods, A. W. 2001 On buoyancy-driven natural ventilation of a room with a heated floor. J. Fluid Mech. 441, 293–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, G. R. & Kaye, N. G. 2001 Virtual origin correction for lazy plumes. J. Fluid Mech. 435, 377–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, N. G. & Hunt, G. R. 2004 Time-dependent flows in an emptying filling box. J. Fluid Mech. 520, 135–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenton, A. G., Fitzgerald, S. & Woods, A. W. 2004 Theory and practice of natural ventilation in a theatre. Proc. PLEA 2004, Eindhoven.Google Scholar
Linden, P. 1999 The fluid mechanics of natural ventilation. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 31, 201–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linden, P. F. & Cooper, P. 1996 Multiple sources of buoyancy in a naturally ventilated enclosure. J. Fluid Mech. 311, 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linden, P., Lane-Serff, G. & Smeed, D. 1990 Emptying filling boxes: the fluid mechanics of natural ventilation. J. Fluid Mech. 212, 309–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, P.-C., Lin, H.-T. & Chou, J.-H. 2009 Evaluation of buoyancy-driven ventilation in atrium buildings using computational fluid dynamics and reduced-scale air model. Build. Environ. 44, 1970–1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livermore, B. & Woods, A. W. 2006 Natural ventilation of multiple storey buildings: the use of stacks for secondary ventilation. Build. Environ. 41 (10), 1339–1351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merci, B. & Maele, K. V. 2008 Numerical simulations of full-scale enclosure fires in a small compartment with natural roof ventilation. Fire Saf. J. 43, 495–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, B., Taylor, G. & Turner, J. 1956 Turbulent gravitational convection from maintained and instantaneous sources. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 234 (1196), 1–23.Google Scholar
Pawlak, G. & Armi, L. 2000 Mixing and entrainment in developing stratified currents. J. Fluid Mech. 424, 45–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. S. 1979 Buoyancy Effects in Fluids. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wells, M. G. & Wettlaufer, J. S. 2007 The long-term circulation driven by density currents in a two-layer stratified basin. J. Fluid Mech. 572, 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, A. W., Fitzgerald, S. D. & Livermore, S. 2009 A comparison of winter preheating requirements for natural displacement and natural mixing ventilation. Energy Build. 41 (12), 1306–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar