Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:42:41.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Flexible body with drag independent of the flow velocity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2013

Thomas Barois  and
Emmanuel de Langre
Thomas Barois
Affiliation:
LadHyX, Department of Mechanics, École Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, France
Emmanuel de Langre*
Affiliation:
LadHyX, Department of Mechanics, École Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, France
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The drag of a rigid object is expected to increase with flow velocity. For wide ranges of velocities commonly encountered, the drag increases as the square of the relative velocity of the fluid. This strong dependence of the load on the velocity accounts for specific survival strategies adopted by passive living systems such as plants in wind or algae in marine environments: through elastic reconfiguration, the drag on plants is reduced when compared to a rigid configuration and the velocity exponent for the drag is typically found to be between 1 and 1.5. In this work, a membrane configuration is presented that exhibits a drag force that is almost independent of the free-stream velocity. This surprising result is shown to be remarkably robust as it is experimentally observed for a range of geometries. This study opens the way for the design of devices subjected to a drag that is independent of the flow velocity. This possibility constitutes a key point in various fields involving flexible structures that are towed or subjected to wind.

JFM classification

Aerodynamics: Aerodynamics Aerodynamics: Flow-structure interactions
Type
Rapids
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 735 , 25 November 2013 , R2
Copyright
©2013 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alben, S., Shelley, M. & Zhang, J. 2002 Drag reduction through self-similar bending of a flexible body. Nature 420, 479.Google Scholar
Albert, R., Pfeifer, M. A., Barabási, A.-L. & Schiffer, P. 1999 Slow drag in a granular medium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 205.Google Scholar
Blevins, R. D. 2003 Applied Fluid Dynamics Handbook. Krieger.Google Scholar
Ennos, A. R. 1997 Wind as an ecological factor. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gosselin, F., de Langre, E. & Machado-almeida, B. A. 2010 Drag reduction of flexible plates by reconfiguration. J. Fluid Mech. 650, 319.Google Scholar
Harder, D. L., Speck, O., Hurd, C. L. & Speck, T. 2004 Reconfiguration as a prerequisite for survival in highly unstable flow-dominated habitats. J. Plant Growth Regul. 23, 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, L. D., Lifshitz, E. M., Kosevitch, A. M. & Pitaevskiĭ, L. P. 1986 Theory of Elasticity 7. Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
de Langre, E. 2008 Effects of winds on plants. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40, 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhar, M. & Nepf, H. M. 2011 Flow-induced reconfiguration of buoyant and flexible aquatic vegetation. Limnol. Oceanogr. 56, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sand-Jensen, K. 2003 Drag and reconfiguration of freshwater macrophytes. Freshwat. Biol. 48, 271.Google Scholar
Schouveiler, L. & Boudaoud, A. 2006 The rolling up of sheets in a steady flow. J. Fluid Mech. 563, 71.Google Scholar
Statzner, B., Lamouroux, N., Nikora, V. & Sagnes, P. 2006 The debate about drag and reconfiguration of freshwater macrophytes: comparing results obtained by three recently discussed approaches. Freshwat. Biol. 51, 2173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, S. 1996 Life in Moving Fluids. Princetown University Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. 2009 Leaves in the lowest and highest winds: temperature, force and shape. New Phytol. 183, 13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wirtz, D. 1995 Direct measurement of the transport properties of a single DNA molecule. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed