Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T18:39:22.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feedback control of subsonic cavity flows using reduced-order models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2007

M. SAMIMY ,
M. DEBIASI ,
E. CARABALLO ,
A. SERRANI ,
X. YUAN ,
J. LITTLE  and
J. H. MYATT
M. SAMIMY*
Affiliation:
Gas Dynamics and Turbulence Laboratory; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Collaborative Center for Control Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43235 USA, USA
M. DEBIASI
Affiliation:
Gas Dynamics and Turbulence Laboratory; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Collaborative Center for Control Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43235 USA, USA
E. CARABALLO
Affiliation:
Gas Dynamics and Turbulence Laboratory; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Collaborative Center for Control Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43235 USA, USA
A. SERRANI
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Collaborative Center for Control Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43235 USA, USA
X. YUAN
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Collaborative Center for Control Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43235 USA, USA
J. LITTLE
Affiliation:
Gas Dynamics and Turbulence Laboratory; Department of Mechanical Engineering, Collaborative Center for Control Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43235 USA, USA
J. H. MYATT
Affiliation:
Air Force Research Laboratory – Air Vehicles Directorate, Wright–Patterson AFB, USA
*
†Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Development, experimental implementation, and the results of reduced-order model based feedback control of subsonic shallow cavity flows are presented and discussed. Particle image velocimetry (PIV) data and the proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) technique are used to extract the most energetic flow features or POD eigenmodes. The Galerkin projection of the Navier–Stokes equations onto these modes is used to derive a set of nonlinear ordinary differential equations, which govern the time evolution of the eigenmodes, for the controller design. Stochastic estimation is used to correlate surface pressure data with flow-field data and dynamic surface pressure measurements are used to estimate the state of the flow. Five sets of PIV snapshots of a Mach 0.3 cavity flow with a Reynolds number of 105 based on the cavity depth are used to derive five different reduced-order models for the controller design. One model uses only the snapshots from the baseline (unforced) flow while the other four models each use snapshots from the baseline flow combined with snapshots from an open-loop sinusoidal forcing case. Linear-quadratic optimal controllers based on these models are designed to reduce cavity flow resonance and are evaluated experimentally. The results obtained with feedback control show a significant attenuation of the resonant tone and a redistribution of the energy into other modes with smaller energy levels in both the flow and surface pressure spectra. This constitutes a significant improvement in comparison with the results obtained using open-loop forcing. These results affirm that reduced-order model based feedback control represents a formidable alternative to open-loop strategies in cavity flow control problems even in its current state of infancy.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 579 , 25 May 2007 , pp. 315 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

Present address: Temasek Laboratories, National University of Singapore.

References

REFERENCES

Adrian, R. J. 1979 On the Role of Conditional Averages in Turbulent Theory. Turbulence in Liquids. Science Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Adrian, R. J. & Moin, P. 1988 Stochastic estimation of organized turbulent structure: homogeneous shear Flow. J. Fluid Mech. 190, 531–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, J. & Kerschen, E. 2005 Influence of wind tunnel walls on the cavity acoustic resonances. AIAA Paper 2005-2804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, J., Kerschen, E. & Tumin, A. 2004 A theoretical model for cavity acoustic resonances in subsonic flows. AIAA Paper 2004-2845.Google Scholar
Ausseur, J. M., Pinier, J. T., Glauser, M. N., Higuchi, H. & Carlson, H. 2006 Experimental development of a reducer-order model for flow separation control. AIAA Paper 2006-1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkooz, G., Holmes, P. & Lumley, J. L. 1993 The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 25, 539–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabell, R. H., Kegerise, M. A., Cox, D. E. & Gibbs, G. P. 2002 Experimental feedback control of flow induced cavity Tones. AIAA Paper 2002-2497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caraballo, E., Malone, J., Samimy, M. & Debonis, J. 2004 A study of subsonic cavity flows – low dimensional modeling. AIAA Paper 2004-2124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caraballo, E., Yuan, X., Little, J., Debiasi, M., Yan, P., Serrani, A., Myatt, J. & Samimy, M. 2005 Feedback control of cavity flow using experimental based reduced order model. AIAA Paper 2005-5269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caraballo, E., Yuan, X., Little, J., Debiasi, M., Serrani, A., Myatt, J. & Samimy, M. 2006 Further development of feedback control of cavity flow using experimental based reduced order model. AIAA Paper 2006-1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caraballo, E., Little, J., Debiasi, M., Serrani, A. & Samimy, M. 2007 Reduced-order model for feedback control of cavity flow – the effects of control input separation. AIAA Paper 2007-1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattafesta III, L. N., Garg, S., Choudhari, M. & Li, F. 1997 Active control of flow-induced cavity resonance. AIAA Paper 1997-1804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattafesta, L., Garg, S., Kegerise, M. & Jones, G. 1998 Experiments on compressible flow-induced cavity resonance. AIAA Paper 1998-2912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattafesta, L., Shukla, D., Garg, S. & Ross, J. 1999 Development of an adaptive weapons-bay suppression system. AIAA Paper 1999-1901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattafesta III, L. N., Williams, D. R., Rowley, C. W. & Alvi, F. S. 2003 Review of active control of flow-induced cavity resonance. AIAA Paper 2003-3567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citriniti, J. & George, W. 2000 Reconstruction of the global velocity field in the axisymmetric mixing layer utilizing the proper orthogonal decomposition. J. Fluid Mech. 418, 137–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, D. R. & Glauser, M. N. 1998 Application of stochastic estimation in the axisymmetric sudden expansion. Phys. Fluids 10 (11), 2941–2949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debiasi, M. & Samimy, M. 2004 Logic-based active control of subsonic cavity flow resonance. AIAA J. 42, 1901–1909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debiasi, M., Little, J., Malone, J., Samimy, M., Yan, P. & Özbay, H. 2004 An experimental study of subsonic cavity flow – physical understanding and control. AIAA Paper 2004-2123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delville, J., Cordier, L. & Bonnet, J. P. 1998 Large-scale-structure identification and control in turbulent shear flows. In Flow Control: Fundamentals and Practice (ed. Gad-el-Hak, M., Pollard, A., Bonnet, J.), pp. 199–273. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efe, M. Ö. & Özbay, H. 2003 Proper orthogonal decomposition for reduced order modeling: 2D heat flow. IEEE Intl Conf. on Control Applications (CCA 2003), Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 1273– 1278.Google Scholar
Efe, M., Debiasi, M., Yan, P., Özbay, H. & Samimy, M. 2005 Control of subsonic cavity flows by neural networks-analytical models and experimental validation. AIAA Paper 2005-0294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freund & Colonius 2002.Google Scholar
Gad-el-Hak, M. 2000 Flow Control – Passive, Active, and Reactive Flow Management. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerhard, J., Pastoor, M., King, R., Noack, B., Dillmann, A., Morzynski, M. & Tadmor, G. 2003 Model-based control of vortex shedding using low-dimensional Galerkin models. AIAA Paper 2003-4262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glauser, M., Eaton, E., Taylor, J., Cole, D., Ukeiley, L., Citriniti, J., George, W & Stokes, S. 1999 Low-dimensional descriptions of turbulent flows: experiment and modeling. AIAA Paper 1999-3699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glauser, M. N., Higuchi, H., Ausseur, J. & Pinier, J. 2004 Feedback control of separated flows. AIAA Paper 2004-2521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grove, J., Leugers, J. & Akroyd, G. 2003 USAF/RAAF F-111 flight test with active separation control. AIAA Paper 2003-0009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. K. & White, P. R. 1996 The analysis of non-stationary signals using time-frequency methods. J. Sound Vib. 190, 419–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, H. H. & Bliss, D. B. 1975 The physical mechanisms of flow-induced pressure fluctuations in cavities and concepts for their suppression. AIAA Paper 1975-491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, P., Lumley, J. L. & Berkooz, G. 1996 Turbulence, Coherent Structures, Dynamical System, and Symmetry. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hussain, A. & Zaman, K. 1985 An Experimental study of organized motions in the turbulent plane mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 159, 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kegerise, M., Cattafesta, L. & Ha, C. 2002 Adaptive identification and control of flow-induced cavity oscillations. AIAA Paper 2002-3158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerschen, E. & Tumin, A. 2003 A theoretical model of cavity acoustic resonances based on edge scattering processes. AIAA Paper 2003-0175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K., Debiasi, M., Serrani, A., & Samimy, M. 2007 System identification and feedback control of a synthetic jet-like compression driver actuators. AIAA Paper 2007-0880.Google Scholar
Little, J., Debiasi, M. & Samimy, M. 2006 Flow structure in controlled and baseline subsonic cavity flows. AIAA Paper 2006-0480.Google Scholar
Lumley, J. 1967 The structure of inhomogeneous turbulent flows. Atmospheric turbulence and Wave Propagation pp. 166–176. Nauca, Moscow.Google Scholar
Mcgrath, S. & Shaw, L. 1996 Active control of shallow cavity acoustic resonance. AIAA Paper 1996-1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, N. & Ukeiley, L. 2002 Estimating the shear layer velocity field above an open cavity from surface pressure measurements. AIAA Paper 2002-2866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naguib, A., Wark, C. & Juckenhoefel, O. 2001 Stochastic estimation and flow sources associated with surface pressure events in a turbulent boundary layer. Phys. Fluids 13 (9), 2611–2616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noack, B., Tadmor, G. & Morzynski, M. 2004 Low-dimensional models for feedback flow control. Part I: Empirical Galerkin models. AIAA Paper 2004-2408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picard, C. & Delville, J. 2000 Pressure velocity coupling in a subsonic round jet. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 21, 359–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qian, S & Chen, D. 1996 Joint Time–Frequency Analysis. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Rockwell, D. & Naudascher, E. 1978 Review – self-sustaining oscillations of flow past cavities. Trans. ASME I: J. Fluids Engng 100, 152–165.Google Scholar
Rossiter, J. E. 1964 Wind tunnel experiments on the flow over rectangular cavities at subsonic and transonic speeds. RAE Tech. Rep. 64037, and Aeronautical Research Council Reports and Memoranda No. 3438.Google Scholar
Rowley, C. W. 2002 Modeling, simulation and control of cavity flow oscillations. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Rowley, C. & Williams, D. 2003 Control of forced and self-sustained oscillations in the flow past a cavity. AIAA Paper 2003-0008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowley, C. & Williams, D. 2006 Dynamics and control of high-Reynolds-number flow over open cavities. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 38, 251–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowley, C. W., Williams, D. R., Colonius, T., Murray, R. M., Macmartin, D. G. & Fabris, D. 2002 Model-based control of cavity oscillations. Part II: System identification and analysis. AIAA Paper 2002-0972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samimy, M., Debiasi, M., Caraballo, E., Özbay, H., Efe, M. O., Yuan, X., Debonis, J. & Myatt, J. H. 2003 Closed-loop active flow control: a collaborative approach. AIAA Paper 2003-0058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samimy, M., Debiasi, M., Caraballo, E., Malone, J., Little, J., ÖZbay, H., Efe, M. Ö., Yan, P., Yuan, X., Debonis, J., Myatt, J. H. & Camphouse, R. C. 2004 Exploring strategies for closed-loop cavity flow control. AIAA Paper 2004-0576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarno, R. & Franke, M. 1994 Suppression of flow-induced pressure oscillations in cavities. J. Aircraft 31, 90–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, L. 1998 Active control for cavity acoustics. AIAA Paper 1998-2347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, L. & Northcraft, S. 1999 Closed loop active control for cavity resonance. AIAA Paper 1999-1902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, S., Cohen, K., Seidel, J. & Mclaughlin, T. 2003 Feedback control of a circular cylinder wake in experiments and simulations. AIAA Paper 2003-3569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, S., Cohen, K., Seidel, J. & Mclaughlin, T. 2005 Two dimensional simulations of a feedback controlled D-cylinder wake. AIAA Paper 2005-5019.Google Scholar
Sirovich, L. 1987 Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. Q. Appl. Maths 45, 561–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
StanekM. J., G. M. J., G., Kibens, V., Ross, J. A., Odedra, J. & Peto, J. W. 2003 High frequency acoustic suppression – the mystery of the rod-in-crossflow revealed. AIAA Paper 2003-0007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tadmor, G., Noack, B., Morzynski, M. & Siegel, S. 2004 Low-dimensional models for feedback flow control. Part II: Control design and dynamical estimation. AIAA Paper 2004-2409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ukeiley, L. & Murray, N. 2005 Velocity and surface pressure measurements in an open cavity. Exps. Fluids 38, 656–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ukeiley, L. S., Ponton, M. K., Seiner, J. M. & Jansen, B. 2002 Suppression of pressure loads in cavity flows. AIAA Paper 2002-0661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D., Fabris, D. & Morrow, J. 2000 Experiments on controlling multiple acoustic modes in cavities. AIAA Paper 2000-1903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D. R., Rowley, C., Colonius, T., Murray, R., Macmartin, D., Fabris, D. & Albertson, J. 2002 Model-based control of cavity oscillations. Part I: Experiments. x 2002-0971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, P., Debiasi, D. Yuan, X., Little, J., Özbay, H. & Samimy, M. 2006 Closed-loop linear control of cavity flow. AIAA J.Google Scholar
Yuan, X., Caraballo, E., Yan, P., Özbay, H., Serrani, A., Debonis, J., Myatt, J. H. & Samimy, M. 2005 Reduced-order model-based feedback controller design for subsonic cavity flows. AIAA Paper 2005-0293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziada, S., Ng, H. & Blake, C. 2003 Flow excited resonance of a confined shallow cavity in low Mach number flow and its control. J. Fluids Struct. 18, 79–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar