Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:39:20.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experiments on an elliptic circulation control aerofoil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2013

Drew A. Wetzel ,
John Griffin  and
Louis N. Cattafesta III
Drew A. Wetzel
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
John Griffin
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
Louis N. Cattafesta III*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
*
†Present address: Department of Mechanical Engineering, FAMU-FSU College of Engineering, Tallahassee, FL 32310, USA. Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments are performed on an elliptic circulation control aerofoil in an open-jet wind tunnel facility. The influence of blowing from a single trailing-edge slot on the external flow is assessed using two-component particle image velocimetry (PIV) and steady surface pressure measurements. The test section configuration (open jet or closed wall) significantly affects the leading-edge region of the flow field. PIV is also used to measure the curved wall jet and its interaction with the external flow near the trailing edge. PIV measurements of the curved wall jet reveal mean tangential velocity similarity in the outer region of the flow above the location where the tangential velocity reaches a local maximum. The length and velocity parameters required for similarity scale with the product of the chord Reynolds number and the momentum coefficient in accordance with the recent publication by Stalnov, Kribus & Seifert (J. Renew. Sustain. Energy, vol. 2, 2010, p. 063101). The separation location is also a function of the product of these parameters. The dataset is used to assemble equations to predict the similarity length scales, velocity scales and separation location. These equations compare well with the present measurements.

JFM classification

Flow Control: Flow Control Wakes/Jets: Jets Wakes/Jets: Wakes/Jets
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 730 , 10 September 2013 , pp. 99 - 144
Copyright
©2013 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

Present address: The Boeing Company, P.O. Box 3707 MC 0R-JF, Seattle, WA 98124, USA.

References

Abramson, J. 1975 Two-dimensional subsonic wind tunnel evaluation of a 20-percent-thick circulation control aerofoil. Tech. Rep. ASED-331. DTNSRDC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramson, J. 1977 Two-dimensional subsonic wind tunnel evaluation of two related cambered 15-percent-thick circulation control aerofoils. Tech. Rep. ASED-373. DTNSRDC.Google Scholar
Abramson, J. 2004 Characteristics of a cambered circulation control aerofoil having both upper and lower surface trailing edge slots. Tech. Rep. NSWCCD-50-TR-2004/030. NSWCCD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedict, L. H. & Gould, R. D. 1996 Towards better uncertainty estimates for turbulence statistics. Exp. Fluids 22 (2), 129–136.Google Scholar
Coanda, H. 1938 Propelling device. US Patent No. 2,108,652.Google Scholar
Coleman, H. W. & Steele, W. G. 2009 Experimentation, Validation, and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
DaVis, 2010 LaVision, ver. 7.4 (software package).Google Scholar
Day, T. R. 2006 Coanda effect and circulation control for nonaeronautical applications. In Applications of Circulation Control Technology (ed. Joslin, R. D. & Jones, G. S.), pp. 599–614. AIAA.Google Scholar
Englar, R. J. 1971 Two-dimensional subsonic wind tunnel tests of two 15-percent thick circulation control aerofoils. Tech. Rep. AL-211. NSRDC.Google Scholar
Englar, R. J. 1975 Circulation control for high lift and drag generation on STOL aircraft. J. Aircraft 12 (5), 457–463.Google Scholar
Englar, R. J. 2006 Pneumatic aerodynamic technology to improve performance and control of automotive vehicles. In Applications of Circulation Control Technology (ed. Joslin, R. D. & Jones, G. S.), pp. 357–382. AIAA.Google Scholar
Gaeta, R. J., Englar, R. J. & Blaylock, G. 2006 Aerodynamic heat exchanger: a novel approach to radiator design using circulation control. In Applications of Circulation Control Technology (ed. Joslin, R. D. & Jones, G. S.), pp. 383–398. AIAA.Google Scholar
Griffin, J., Schultz, T., Holman, R., Ukeiley, L. & Cattafesta, L. 2010 Application of multivariate outlier detection to fluid velocity measurements. Exp. Fluids 49 (1), 305–317.Google Scholar
Guitton, D. E. & Newman, B. G. 1977 Self-preserving turbulent wall jets over convex surfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 81 (1), 155–185.Google Scholar
Han, G., de Zhou, M. & Wygnanski, I. 2006 On streamwise vortices and their role in the development of a curved wall jet. Phys. Fluids 18 (9) 095104.Google Scholar
Howe, M. S. 2002 Noise generated by a Coanda wall jet circulation control device. J. Sound Vib. 249 (4), 679–700.Google Scholar
Katz, J. & Plotkin, A. 2001 Low-Speed Aerodynamics, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kind, R. J. & Maull, D. J. 1968 An experimental investigation of a low-speed circulation-controlled aerofoil. Aeronaut. Q. 19, 170–182.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, R. & Fujisawa, N. 1983 Curvature effects on two-dimensional turbulent wall jets. Arch. Appl. Mech. 53 (6), 409–417.Google Scholar
Launder, B. E. & Rodi, W. 1983 The turbulent wall jet – measurements and modelling. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 15, 429–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Likhachev, O., Neuendorf, R. & Wygnanski, I. 2001 On streamwise vortices in a turbulent wall jet that flows over a convex surface. Phys. Fluids 13 (6), 1822–1825.Google Scholar
Mathew, J., Bahr, C., Carroll, B., Sheplak, M. & Cattafesta, L. 2005 Design, fabrication, and characterization of an anechoic wind tunnel facility. AIAA Paper 2005-3052.Google Scholar
Melling, A. 1997 Tracer particles and seeding for particle image velocimetry. Meas. Sci. Technol. 8, 1406–1416.Google Scholar
Murray, N. E. & Ukeiley, L. S. 2007 An application of gappy POD for subsonic cavity flow PIV data. Exp. Fluids 42, 79–91.Google Scholar
Neuendorf, R., Lourenco, L. & Wygnanski, I. 2004 On large streamwise structures in a wall jet flowing over a circular cylinder. Phys. Fluids 16 (7), 2158–2169.Google Scholar
Neuendorf, R. & Wygnanski, I. 1999 On a turbulent wall jet flowing over a circular cylinder. J. Fluid Mech. 381, 1–25.Google Scholar
Newman, B. G. 1961 The deflexion of plane jets by adjacent boundaries - Coanda effect. In Boundary Layer and Flow Control: Its Principles and Applications, Vol. 1 (ed. Victor Lachmann, Gustav), pp. 232–262. Pergamon.Google Scholar
Novak, C. J. & Cornelius, K. C. 1986 An LDV investigation of a circulation control aerofoil flow field. AIAA Paper 1986-0503.Google Scholar
Novak, C. J., Cornelius, K. C. & Roads, R. K. 1987 Experimental investigations of the circular wall jet on a circulation control aerofoil. AIAA Paper 1987-0155.Google Scholar
Panton, R. L 2005 Incompressible Flow, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Pope, A. & Rae, W. H. 1984 Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing. Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Rew, H. S. & Park, S. O. 1988 The interaction of two opposing, asymmetric curved wall jets. Exp. Fluids 6 (4), 243–252.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. O. & Donnelly, M. J. 2004 Characteristics of a dual-slotted circulation control wing of low aspect ratio intended for naval hydrodynamic applications. AIAA Paper 2004-1244.Google Scholar
Stalnov, O., Kribus, A. & Seifert, A. 2010 Evaluation of active flow control applied to wind turbine blade section. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2 (6)063101.Google Scholar
Westerweel, J. 1994 Efficient detection of spurious vectors in particle image velocimetry data sets. Exp. Fluids 16 (3-4), 236–247.Google Scholar
Wetzel, D. 2011 An experimental investigation of circulation control acoustics. PhD thesis, University of Florida.Google Scholar
Wetzel, D., Griffin, J., Liu, F. & Cattafesta, L. 2009 An experimental study of circulation control on an elliptic aerofoil. AIAA Paper 2009-4280.Google Scholar
Wetzel, D., Griffin, J., Liu, F. & Cattafesta, L. 2010 An experimental study of a circulation control aerofoil trailing edge flow field. AIAA Paper 2010-4576.Google Scholar
Wetzel, D., Liu, F. & Cattafesta, L. 2012 A theoretical and experimental study of broadband circulation control noise. AIAA Paper 2012-2061.Google Scholar
Williams, R. M. 1969 Some research on rotor circulation control. In Proceedings of the 3rd Cal/AV LABS Symposium.Google Scholar
Williams, R. M. & Howe, H. J. 1970 Two-dimensional subsonic wind tunnel tests on a 20 percent thick, 5 percent cambered circulation control aerofoil. Tech. Rep. AL-176. NSRDC.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. J. & Goldstein, R. J. 1976 Turbulent wall jets with cylindrical streamwise surface curvature. Trans. ASME: J. Fluid Engng 98, 550–557.Google Scholar
Zhou, M. D. & Wygnanski, I. 1993 Parameters governing the turbulent wall jet in an external stream. AIAA J. 31 (5).Google Scholar