Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T12:16:28.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of an electric field on the stability of contaminated film flow down an inclined plane

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2008

M. G. BLYTH*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK

Abstract

The stability of a liquid film flowing down an inclined plane is considered when the film is contaminated by an insoluble surfactant and subjected to a uniform normal electric field. The liquid is treated as a perfect conductor and the air above the film is treated as a perfect dielectric. Previous studies have shown that, when acting in isolation, surfactant has a stabilizing influence on the flow while an electric field has a destabilizing influence. The competition between these two effects is the focus of the present study. The linear stability problem is formulated and solved at arbitrary parameter values. An extended form of Squire's theorem is presented to argue that attention may be confined to two-dimensional disturbances. The stability characteristics for Stokes flow are described exactly; the growth rates of the normal modes at finite Reynolds number are computed numerically. We plot the neutral curves dividing regions of stability and instability, and trace how the topology of the curves changes as the intensity of the electric field varies both for a clean and for a contaminated film. With a sufficiently strong electric field, the neutral curve for a clean film consists of a lower branch trapping an area of stable modes around the origin, and an upper branch above which the flow is stable. With surfactant present, a similar situation obtains, but with an additional island of stable modes disjoint from the upper and lower branches.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adamson, A. W. 1990 Physical Chemistry of Surfaces. Wiley.Google Scholar
Anshus, B. E. & Acrivos, A. 1967 The effect of surface-active agents on the stability characteristics of falling liquid films. Chem. Engng Sci. 22, 389393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1957 Wave formation in laminar flow down an inclined plane. J. Fluid Mech. 2, 554574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1964 Effect of surface contamination on wave formation in falling liquid films. Archwm. Mech. Stosow. 16, 615626.Google Scholar
Blyth, M. G. & Pozrikidis, C. 2004 a Effect of surfactants on the stability of two-layer channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 505, 5986.Google Scholar
Blyth, M. G. & Pozrikidis, C. 2004 b Effect of surfactant on the stability of film flow down an inclined plane. J. Fluid Mech. 521, 241250.Google Scholar
Blyth, M. G. & Pozrikidis, C. 2004 c Effect of inertia on the Marangoni instability of the two-layer channel flow. Part II. Normal-mode analysis. J. Engng Maths. 50, 329341.Google Scholar
Drazin, P. G. & Reid, W. H. 1981 Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dukler, A. 1976 The role of waves in two phase flow: some new understanding. Chem. Engng Educ. Summer, 108138.Google Scholar
Eggleton, C. D., Pawar, Y. P. & Stebe, K. J. 1999 Insoluble surfactants on a drop in an extensional flow: a generalization of the stagnated surface limit to deforming interfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 385, 7999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenkel, A. L. & Halpern, D. 2002 Stokes flow instability due to interfacial surfactant. Phys. Fluids 14, 4548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenkel, A. L. & Halpern, D. 2005 Effect of inertia on the insoluble-surfactant instability of a shear flow. Phys. Rev. E 71, 016302.Google ScholarPubMed
Gonzalez, A. & Castellanos, A. 1996 Nonlinear electrohydrodynamic waves on films falling down an inclined plane. Phys. Rev. E 53, 35733578.Google ScholarPubMed
Griffing, E. M., Bankhoff, S. G., Miksis, M. J. & Schluter, R. A. 2006 Electrohydrodynamics of thin flowing films. Trans. ASME I: J. Fluids Engng 128, 276283.Google Scholar
Ha, J.-W. & Yang, S.-M. 1995 Effects of surfactant on the deformation and stability of a drop in a viscous fluid in an electric field. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 175, 369385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ha, J.-W. & Yang, S.-M. 1998 Effect of nonionic surfactant on the deformation and breakup of a drop in an electric field. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 206, 195204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halpern, D. & Frenkel, A. L. 2003 Destabilization of a creeping flow by interfacial surfactant: linear theory extended to all wavenumbers. J. Fluid Mech. 485, 191220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesla, T. I., Pranckh, F. R. & Preziosi, L. 1986 Squire's theorem for two stratified fluids. Phys. Fluids 29, 28082811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ji, W. & Setterwall, F. 1994 On the instabilities of vertical falling liquid films in the presence of surface-active solute. J. Fluid Mech. 278, 297323.Google Scholar
Karniadakis, G., Beskok, A. & Aluru, N. 2005 Microflows and Nanoflows. Springer.Google Scholar
Kim, H., Bankoff, S. G. & Miksis, M. J. 1991 The effect of an electrostatic field on film flow down an inclined plane. Phys. Fluids A 4, 21172130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kistler, S. F. & Schweizer, P. M. 1997 Liquid Film Coating. Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X. F. & Pozrikidis, C. 1997 The effect of surfactants on drop deformation and on the rheology of dilute emulsions in Stokes flow. J. Fluid Mech. 341, 165194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, S. P. 1970 Stabilizing effects of surface-active agents on a film flow. AIChE 16, 375379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matar, O. K. & Lawrence, C. J. 2006 The flow of a thin conducting film over a spinning disc in the presence of an electric field. Chem. Engng Sci. 61, 38383849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melcher, J. R. & Taylor, G. I. 1969 Electrohydrodynamics: a review of the role of interfacial shear stresses. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1, 111146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukhopadhyay, A. & Dandapat, B. S. 2005 Nonlinear stability of a conducting viscous film flowing down an inclined plane at moderate Reynolds number in the presence of a uniform normal electric field. J. Phys. D 38, 138143.Google Scholar
Pozrikidis, C. 2003 Effect of surfactants on film flow down a periodic wall. J. Fluid Mech. 496, 105127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pozrikidis, C. 2004 Instability of multi-layer channel and film flows. Adv. Appl. Mech. 40, 179239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, M. C., Sun, S. M. & Meyer, R. E. 1991 Surface waves on viscous magnetic fluid flow down an inclined plane. Phys. Fluids A 3, 439445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tseluiko, D. & Papageorgiou, D. T. 2006 Wave evolution on electrified falling films. J. Fluid Mech. 556, 361386.Google Scholar
Weinstein, S. J. & Ruschak, K. J. 2004 Coating flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 2953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wierschem, A., Scholle, M. & Aksel, N. 2003 Vortices in film flow over strongly undulated bottom profiles at low Reynolds numbers. Phys. Fluids 15, 426435.Google Scholar
Whitaker, S. 1964 Effect of surface active agents on the stability of falling liquid films. Ind. Engng Chem. Fundls 3, 132142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, S. & Jones, L. O. 1966 Stability of falling liquid films. Effect of interface and interfacial mass transport. AIChE 12, 421431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yih, C. S. 1955 Stability of two-dimensional parallel flows for three-dimensional disturbances. Q. Appl. Maths. 12, 434435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yih, C. S. 1963 Stability of a liquid flow down an inclined plane. Phys. Fluids 6, 321334.Google Scholar
Yon, S. & Pozrikidis, C. 1998 A finite-volume/boundary-element method for flow past interfaces in the presence of surfactants, with application to shear flow past a viscous drop. Comput. Fluids 27, 879902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshimura, P., Nosoko, T. & Nagata, T. 1996 Enhancement of mass transfer into a falling laminar liquid film by two-dimensional surface waves – some experimental observations and modeling. Chem. Engng Sci. 51, 12311240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar