Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T17:19:27.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamics of three-dimensional coherent structures in a flat-plate boundary layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Dietmar Rempfer  and
Hermann F. Fasel
Dietmar Rempfer
Affiliation:
Institut für Aerodynamik und Gasdynamik, Universität Stuttgart, 70550 Stuttgart, Germany
Hermann F. Fasel
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An investigation is presented that analyses the energy flows that are connected to the dynamical behaviour of coherent structures in a transitional flat-plate boundary layer. Based on a mathematical description of the three-dimensional coherent structures of this flow as provided by the Karhunen–Loève procedure, energy equations for the coherent structures are derived by Galerkin projection of the Navier–Stokes equations in vorticity transport formulation onto the corresponding basis of eigenfunctions. In a first step, the time-averaged energy balance – showing the energy flows that support the different coherent structures and thus maintain the fluctuations of the velocity field – is considered. In a second step, the instantaneous power budget is investigated for the particularly interesting case of a coherent structure providing a prime contribution to the characteristic spike events of the transitional boundary layer. As this structure shows a strong variation in energy, the question about which mechanisms cause these variations is addressed. Our results show that the occurrence of a spike must be attributed to an autonomous event and cannot be interpreted as just an epiphenomenon of the passage of a Λ-vortex.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 275 , 25 September 1994 , pp. 257 - 283
Copyright
© 1994 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aubry, N., Guyonnet, R. & Lima, R. 1992 Spatio-temporal symmetries and bifurcations via bi-orthogonal decompositions. J. Nonlin. Sci. 2, 683–739.Google Scholar
Aubry, N., Holmes, P., Lumley, J. L. & Stone, E. 1988 The dynamics of coherent structures in the wall region of a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 192, 115–173.Google Scholar
Berkooz, G., Holmes, P. & Lumley, J. L. 1993 The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 25, 539–575.Google Scholar
Blackwelder, R. F. 1983 Analogies between transitional and turbulent boundary layers. Phys. Fluids A 26, 2807–2815.Google Scholar
Brown, G. L. & Roshko, A. 1974 On density effects and large structure in turbulent mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 64, 775–816.Google Scholar
Cantwell, B. J. 1981 Organized motion in turbulent flow. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 13, 457–515.Google Scholar
Deane, A. E., Kevrekidis, I. G., Karniadakis, G. E. & Orszag, S. A. 1991 Low-dimensional models for complex geometry flows: Application to grooved channels and circular cylinders. Phys. Fluids A 3, 2337–2354.Google Scholar
Einstein, H. A. & Li, H. 1956 The viscous sublayer along a smooth boundary. J. Engng Mech. Div. ASCE 82 (EM2): Paper 945.Google Scholar
Fiedler, H. E. 1987 Coherent structures. In Advances in Turbulence (ed. G. Comte-Bellot & J. Mathieu), pp. 320–336. Springer.
Gupta, A. K., Laufer, J. & Kaplan, R. E. 1971 Spatial structure in the viscous sublayer. J. Fluid Mech. 50, 493–512.Google Scholar
Hussain, A. K. M. F. 1983 Coherent structures – reality and myth. Phys. Fluids A 26, 2816–2850.Google Scholar
Hussain, A. K. M. F. 1986 Coherent structures and turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 173, 303–356.Google Scholar
Kachanov, Y. S., Kozlov, V. V., Levchenko, V. Y. & Ramazanov, M. R 1985 On nature of k-breakdown of a laminar boundary-layer. New experimental data. In Laminar-Turbulent Transition (ed. V. V. Kozlov), pp. 61–73. Springer.
Kim, H. T., Kline, S. J. & Reynolds, W. C. 1971 The production of turbulence near a smooth wall in a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 50, 133–160.Google Scholar
Kline, S. J., Reynolds, W. C., Schraub, F. A. & Runstadler, P. W. 1967 The structure of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 30, 741–773.Google Scholar
Kline, S. J. & Runstadler, P. W. 1959 Some preliminary results of visual studies of the flow model of the wall layers of the turbulent boundary layer. Trans. ASME, E: J. Appl. Mech. 2, 166–170.Google Scholar
Kloker, M. 1993 Direkte numerische Simulation des laminar-turbulenten Strömungsumschlages in einer stark verzögerten Grenzschicht. Dissertation, University of Stuttgart.
Kloker, M., Konzelmann, U. & Fasel, H. 1993 Outflow boundary conditions for spatial Navier-Stokes simulations of transition boundary layers. AIAA J. 31, 620–628.Google Scholar
Loève, M. 1955 Probability theory. Van Nostrand.
Lumley, J. L. 1967 The structure of inhomogeneous turbulent flows. In Atmospheric Turbulence and Radio Wave Propagation (ed. A. M. Yaglom & V. I. Tatarski), pp. 166–178. Nauka, Moscow.
Lumley, J. L. 1970 Stochastic Tools in Turbulence. Academic.
McComb, W. D. 1990 The Physics of Fluid Turbulence. Clarendon.
Monin, A. S. & Yaglom, A. M. 1973 Statistical Fluid Mechanics. MIT Press.
Noack, B. R. & Eckelmann, H. 1993 A low-dimensional Galerkin method for the three-dimensional flow around a circular cylinder. Phys. Fluids A 6, 124–143.Google Scholar
Perry, A. E., Lim, T. T. & Teh, E. W. 1981 A visual study of turbulent spots. J. Fluid Mech. 104, 387–405.Google Scholar
Rajaee, M., Karlsson, S. K. F. & Sirovich, L. 1994 Low-dimensional description of free-shear-flow coherent structures and their dynamical behaviour. J. Fluid Mech. 258, 1–29.Google Scholar
Rempfer, D. 1991 Kohärente Strukturen und Chaos beim laminar-turbulenten Grenzschichtumschlag. Dissertation, University of Stuttgart.
Rempfer, D. 1993 Low-dimensional models of a flat-plate boundary layer. In Near-Wall Turbulent Flows (ed. R. M. C. So, C. G. Speziale & B. E. Launder), pp. 63–72. Elsevier.
Rempfer, D. 1994 On the structure of dynamical systems describing the evolution of coherent structures in a convective boundary layer. Phys. Fluids 6, 1402–1404.Google Scholar
Rempfer, D. & Fasel, H. 1994 Evolution of three-dimensional coherent structures in a flat-plate boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 260, 351–375.Google Scholar
Reynolds, O. 1883 On the experimental investigation of the circumstances which determine whether the motion of water shall be direct or sinuous, and the law of resistance in parallel channels. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 174, 935–982.Google Scholar
Rist, U. & Fasel, H. 1994 Direct numerical simulation of controlled transition in a flat-plate boundary layer. (to appear in J. Fluid Mech.)Google Scholar
Robinson, S. K. 1991 Coherent motions in the turbulent boundary layer. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23, 601–639.Google Scholar
Runstadler, P. G., Kline, S. J. & Reynolds, W. C. 1963 An experimental investigation of flow structure of the turbulent boundary layer. Rep. No. MD-8 Dept Mech. Engng, Stanford University Stanford, CA.
Sirovich, L. 1987 Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. Q. Appl. Maths 45, 561–590.Google Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1956 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow. Cambridge University Press.
Wallace, J. M., Eckelmann, H. & Brodkey, R. S. 1972 The wall region in turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 54, 39–48.Google Scholar
Williams, D. R., Fasel, H. & Hama, F. R. 1984 Experimental determination of the three-dimensional vorticity field in the boundary-layer transition process. J. Fluid Mech. 149, 179–203.Google Scholar
Willmarth, W. W. & Lu, S. S. 1972 Structure of the Reynolds stress near the wall. J. Fluid Mech. 55, 65–92.Google Scholar
Zhou, X. & Sirovich, L. 1992 Coherence and chaos in a model of turbulent boundary layer. Phys. Fluids A 4, 2855–2874.Google Scholar