Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T21:53:23.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamical system approach to instability of flow past a circular cylinder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2010

TAPAN K. SENGUPTA ,
NEELU SINGH  and
V. K. SUMAN
TAPAN K. SENGUPTA*
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208 016, India
NEELU SINGH
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208 016, India
V. K. SUMAN
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208 016, India
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The main aim of this paper is to relate instability modes with modes obtained from proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) in the study of global spatio-temporal nonlinear instabilities for flow past a cylinder. This is a new development in studying nonlinear instabilities rather than spatial and/or temporal linearized analysis. We highlight the importance of multi-modal interactions among instability modes using dynamical system and bifurcation theory approaches. These have been made possible because of accurate numerical simulations. In validating computations with unexplained past experimental results, we noted that (i) the primary instability depends upon background disturbances and (ii) the equilibrium amplitude obtained after the nonlinear saturation of primary growth of disturbances does not exhibit parabolic variation with Reynolds number, as predicted by the classical Stuart–Landau equation. These are due to the receptivity of the flow to background disturbances for post-critical Reynolds numbers (Re) and multi-modal interactions, those produce variation in equilibrium amplitude for the disturbances that can be identified as multiple Hopf bifurcations. Here, we concentrate on Re = 60, which is close to the observed second bifurcation. It is also shown that the classical Stuart–Landau equation is not adequate, as it does not incorporate multi-modal interactions. To circumvent this, we have used the eigenfunction expansion approach due to Eckhaus and the resultant differential equations for the complex amplitudes of disturbance field have been called here the Landau–Stuart–Eckhaus (LSE) equations. This approach has not been attempted before and here it is made possible by POD of time-accurate numerical simulations. Here, various modes have been classified either as a regular mode or as anomalous modes of the first or the second kind. Here, the word anomalous connotes non-compliance with the Stuart–Landau equation, although the modes originate from the solution of the Navier–Stokes equation. One of the consequences of multi-modal interactions in the LSE equations is that the amplitudes of the instability modes are governed by stiff differential equations. This is not present in the traditional Stuart–Landau equation, as it retains only the nonlinear self-interaction. The stiffness problem of the LSE equations has been resolved using the compound matrix method.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 656 , 10 August 2010 , pp. 82 - 115
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, L. & Bridges, T. 2002 Numerical exterior algebra and the compound matrix method. Numer. Math. 92, 197–232.Google Scholar
Barkley, D. 2006 Linear analysis of the cylinder wake mean flow. Europhys. Lett. 75 (5), 750–756.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1988 Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chomaz, J.-M. 2005 Global instabilities in spatially developing flows: non-normality and nonlinearity. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 37, 357–392.Google Scholar
Deane, A. E., Kevrekidis, I. G., Karniadakis, G. E. & Orszag, S. A. 1991 Low-dimensional models for complex geometry flows: application to grooved channels and circular cylinders. Phys. Fluids A 3, 2337–2354.Google Scholar
Dipankar, A., Sengupta, T. K. & Talla, S. B. 2007 Suppression of vortex shedding behind a circular cylinder by another control cylinder at low Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 573, 171–190.Google Scholar
Drazin, P. G. & Reid, W. H. 1981 Hydrodynamic Instabilities. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dusek, J., Le Gal, P. & Fraunie, P. 1994 A numerical and theoretical study of the first Hopf bifurcation in a cylinder wake. J. Fluid Mech. 264, 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckhaus, W. 1965 Studies in Nonlinear Stability Theory. Springer.Google Scholar
Giannetti, F. & Luchini, P. 2007 Structural sensitivity of the first instability of the cylinder wake. J. Fluid Mech. 581, 167–197.Google Scholar
Golubitsky, M. & Schaeffer, D. G. 1984 Singularities and Groups in Bifurcation Theory. Springer.Google Scholar
Henderson, R. D. 1997 Nonlinear dynamics and pattern formation in turbulent wake transition. J. Fluid Mech. 352, 65–112.Google Scholar
Holmes, P., Lumley, J. L. & Berkooz, G. 1996 Turbulence, Coherent Structures, Dynamical Systems and Symmetry. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homann, F. 1936 Einfluss grosser Zähigkeit bei Strömung um Zylinder. Forsch. auf dem Gebiete des Ingenieurwesens 7 (1), 1–10.Google Scholar
Huerre, P. & Rossi, M. 1998 Hydrodynamic instabilities in open flows. In Hydrodynamics and Nonlinear Instabilities (ed. Godreche, C. & Manneville, P.), pp. 81–294. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, C. P. 1987 A finite-element study of the onset of vortex shedding in flow past variously shaped bodies. J. Fluid Mech. 182, 23–45.Google Scholar
Kiya, M., Suzuki, Y., Mikio, A. & Hagino, M. 1982 A contribution to the free stream turbulence effect on the flow past a circular cylinder. J. Fluid Mech. 115, 151–164.Google Scholar
Kosambi, D. D. 1943 Statistics in function space. J. Indian Math. Soc. 7, 76–88.Google Scholar
Kovasznay, L. S. G. 1949 Hot-wire investigation of the wake behind cylinders at low Reynolds numbers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 198, 174–190.Google Scholar
Landau, L. D. 1944 On the problem of turbulence. C. R. Acad. Sci. USSR 44, 311–315.Google Scholar
Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. 1959 Fluid Mechanics, vol. 6. Pergamon.Google Scholar
Ma, X. & Karniadakis, G. E. 2002 A low-dimensional model for simulating three-dimensional cylinder flow. J. Fluid Mech. 458, 181–190.Google Scholar
Marquet, O., Sipp, D., Chomaz, J.-M. & Jacquin, L. 2008 Amplifier and resonator dynamics of a low-Reynolds-number recirculation bubble in a global framework. J. Fluid Mech. 605, 429–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morzynski, M., Afanasiev, K. & Thiele, F. 1999 Solution of the eigenvalue problems resulting from global nonparallel flow stability analysis. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng 169, 161–176.Google Scholar
Nishioka, M. & Sato, H. 1978 Mechanism of determination of the shedding frequency of vortices behind a cylinder at low Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 89, 49–60.Google Scholar
Noack, B. R., Afanasiev, K., Morzynski, M., Tadmor, G. & Thiele, F. 2003 A hierarchy of low-dimensional models for the transient and post-transient cylinder wake. J. Fluid Mech. 497, 335–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noack, B. R. & Eckelmann, H. 1994 A low-dimensional Galerkin method for the three-dimensional flow around a circular cylinder. Phys. Fluids 6 (1), 124–143.Google Scholar
Noack, B. R., Papas, P. & Monkewitz, P. A. 2005 The need for a pressure-term representation in empirical Galerkin models of incompressible shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 523, 339–365.Google Scholar
Noack, B. R., Schlegel, M., Ahlborn, B., Mutschke, G., Morzynski, M., Comte, P. & Tadmor, G. 2008 A finite-time thermodynamics of unsteady fluid flows. J. Non-Equilib. Thermodyn. 33, 103–148.Google Scholar
Noack, B. R., Schlegel, M., Morzynski, M. & Tadmor, G. 2009 System reduction strategy for Galerkin models of fluid flows. Intl J. Numer. Methods Fluids 63 (2), (Jan. 2011) doi:10.1002/fld.2049.Google Scholar
Norberg, C. 2003 Fluctuating lift on a circular cylinder: review and new measurements. J. Fluids Struct. 17, 57–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provansal, M., Mathis, C. & Boyer, L. 1987 Benárd–von Kármán instability: transient and forced regimes. J. Fluid Mech. 182, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roshko, A. 1954 On the drag and shedding frequency of two-dimensional bluff bodies. NACA Tech Note 3169.Google Scholar
Schlichting, H. 1987 Boundary Layer Theory. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Sengupta, T. K., Bhumkar, Y. & Lakshmanan, V. 2009 a Design and analysis of a new filter for LES and DES. Comput. Struct. 87, 735–750.Google Scholar
Sengupta, T. K., Das, D., Mohanamuraly, P., Suman, V. K. & Biswas, A. 2009 b Modelling free-stream turbulence based on wind tunnel and flight data for instability studies. Intl J. Emerging Multidiscip. Fluid Sci. 1 (3), 181–201.Google Scholar
Sengupta, T. K. & Dey, S. 2004 Proper orthogonal decomposition of direct numerical simulation data of by-pass transition. Comput. Struct. 82, 2693–2703.Google Scholar
Sengupta, T. K., Sircar, S. K. & Dipankar, A. 2006 High accuracy schemes for DNS and acoustics. J. Sci. Comput. 26 (2), 151–193.Google Scholar
Sengupta, T. K., Suman, V. K. & Singh, N. 2010 Solving Navier–Stokes equation for flow past cylinders using single-block structured and overset grids. J. Comput. Phys. 229 (1), 178–199.Google Scholar
Sengupta, T. K. & Venkatasubbaiah, K. 2006 Spatial stability for mixed convection boundary layer over a heated horizontal plate. Stud. Appl. Math. 117, 265–198.Google Scholar
Sipp, D. & Lebedev, A. 2007 Global stability of base and mean flows: a general approach and its applications to cylinder and open cavity flows. J. Fluid Mech. 593, 333–358.Google Scholar
Sirovich, L. 1987 Turbulence and dynamics of coherent structures. Part I Coherent Structures, Part II Symmetries and Transformations and Part III Dynamics and Scaling. Q. Appl. Math. 45, 561–590.Google Scholar
Sreenivasan, K. R., Strykowski, P. J. & Olinger, D. J. 1987 Hopf bifurcation, Landau equation and vortex shedding behind circular cylinders. In Forum on Unsteady Flow Separation (ed. Ghia, K. N.), pp. 1–13. ASME.Google Scholar
Strykowski, P. J. 1986 The control of absolutely and convectively unstable shear flows. PhD thesis, Yale University.Google Scholar
Strykowski, P. J. & Sreenivasan, K. R. 1990 On the formation and suppression of vortex shedding at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 218, 74–107.Google Scholar
Stuart, J. T. 1960 On the nonlinear mechanics of wave disturbances in stable and unstable parallel flows. Part 1. The basic behaviour in plane Poiseuille flow. J. Fluid Mech. 9, 353–370.Google Scholar
Tadmor, G., Lehmann, O., Noack, B. & Morzynski, M. 2010 Mean field representation of the natural and actuated cylinder wake. Phys. Fluids 22 (3), 034102-1 to 22.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. C. & Le Gal, P. 2004 The Stuart–Landau model applied to wake transition revisited. Eur. J. Mech., B/Fluids 23, 219–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tordella, D. & Cancelli, C. 1991 First instabilities in the wake past a circular cylinder: comparison of transient regimes with Landau's model. Meccanica 26, 75–83.Google Scholar
Van der Vorst, H. A. 1992 Bi-CGSTAB: a fast and smoothly converging variant of Bi-CG for the solution of non-symmetric linear systems. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 12, 631–644.Google Scholar
Watson, J. 1960 On the nonlinear mechanics of wave disturbances in stable and unstable parallel flows. Part 2. The development of a solution for plane Poiseuille flow and for plane Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 9, 371–389.Google Scholar
Williamson, C. H. K. 1989 Oblique and parallel modes of vortex shedding in the wake of circular cylinder at low Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 206, 579–627.Google Scholar
Zebib, A. 1987 Stability of viscous flow past a circular cylinder. J. Engng Math. 21, 155–165.Google Scholar