Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T18:55:35.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Direct measurement of aerodynamic pressure above a simple progressive gravity wave

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2006

Omar H. Shemdin
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California
En Yun Hsu
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California

Abstract

Measurements of the aerodynamic pressure distribution at the interface between air and simple progressive water waves are obtained with the use of a pressure sensor that follows the water surface. The theory of Miles (1957, 1959) and Benjamin (1959) on shear flows past a wavy boundary predicts a phase shift between the pressure distribution along the boundary and the boundary itself. An experimental verification of this theory is sought especially. A wind–wave facility 115 ft. long, 6 ft. high and 3 ft. wide was used. The facility is equipped with an oscil-lating-plate wave-generator which is capable of generating sinusoidal or arbitrary wave-forms, and a suction fan which can produce wind velocities up to 80 ft./sec when the water is at a nominal depth of 3 ft. The pressure sensor used for the measurements of pressure, was mounted on an oscillating device such that the sensor could be maintained at a fixed small distance (within 1/4 in.) above a propagating wavy surface at all times. The perturbation pressure over progressive waves is extracted from recorded data sensed by the moving sensor. The results compare favourably with the theoretical predictions of Miles (1959).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1967 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benjamin, T. B. 1959 Shearing flow over a wavy boundary. J. Fluid Mech. 6, 161.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. S. & Hanratty, T. S. 1965 Generation of waves in the co-current flow of air and a liquid. A.I.Ch.E. 11, 138.Google Scholar
Cox, C. S. 1958 Measurement of slopes of high frequency wind waves. J. Marine Res. 16, 199.Google Scholar
Hasselmann, K. F. 1966 Interactions between the ocean waves and the atmosphere. 6th Hydrodynamics Naval Symposium, Washington, D.C.
Hidy, G. & Plate, E. 1966 Wind action on water standing in a laboratory channel. J. Fluid Mech. 26, 651.Google Scholar
Hsu, E. Y. 1965 A wind-wave research facility. Stanford University Department of Civil Engineering, Rept. 57, Stanford.Google Scholar
Lamb, H. 1945 Hydrodynamics. New York: Dover.
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1962 The directional spectrum of ocean waves and process of wave generation. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 265, 286.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1957 On the generation of surface waves by shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 3, 185.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1959 On the generation of surface waves by shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 6, 568.Google Scholar
Phillips, O. M. 1957 On the generation of waves by turbulent wind. J. Fluid Mech. 2, 417.Google Scholar
Shemdin, O. H. & Hsu, E. Y. 1966 Dynamics of wind in the vicinity of progressive waves. Proc. 10th Conf. Coastal Eng., Tokyo.
Snyder, R. L. & Cox, C. S. 1966 A field study of the wind generation of ocean waves. J. Marine Res. 24, 141.Google Scholar
Ursell, F. 1956 Wave generation by wind. Article in Surveys in Mechanics. Cambridge University Press.
Wiegel, R. L. & Cross, R. H. 1966 Generation of wind waves. J. Waterways and Harbors Div., ASCE, 92, 1.Google Scholar