Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:02:55.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diffusion-flame structure for a two-step chain reaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

William B. Bush  and
Francis E. Fendell
William B. Bush
Affiliation:
University of California, La Jolla, California 92037
Francis E. Fendell
Affiliation:
TRW Systems Group, Redondo Beach, California 90278
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The low-speed combustion of initially unmixed gaseous reactants under an irreversible two-step chain reaction is examined. Both equilibrium burning, in which two spatially separated flames of zero thickness arise, and near-equilibrium burning, in which two spatially separated flames of small but finite thickness arise, are studied by limit-process expansion techniques. Two time-dependent flows are examined: the first is (one-dimensional) transient mixing flow; and the second is (two-dimensional) transient counterflow. The latter flow, in which there is an impressed finite strain parallel to the flame, such that the flame itself is longitudinally stretched, is discussed as elucidating the characteristics of combustion in non-equilibrium turbulent shear flow.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 64 , Issue 4 , 24 July 1974 , pp. 701 - 724
Copyright
© 1974 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, G. & Roshko, A. 1971 The effect of density difference on the turbulent mixing layer. In Turbulent Shear Flow, Agard Conf. Proc. no. 93, pp. 23.1–23.12.
Burke, S. P. & Schumann, T. E. W. 1928 Diffusion flames. Indwt. Engng Chem. 20, 998–1004.
Bush, W. B. & Fendell, F. E. 1973a The structure of multiple diffusion flames for a two-step chain reaction. Project Squid Tech. Rep. TRW-6-PU. Purdue University.Google Scholar
Bush, W. B. & Fendell, F. E. 1973b On duffusion flames in turbulent shear flows. Project Squid Tech. Rep. TRW-7-PU. Purdue University. (To appear in Acta Astronautica.)Google Scholar
Carslaw, H. S. & Jaeger, J. C. 1959 Conduction of Heat in Solids. 2nd edn, p. 53. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Clarke, J. F. 1968 On the structure of a hydrogen-oxygen diffusion flame. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 307, 283–302.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. F. 1969 Reaction-broadening in a hydrogen-oxygen diffusion flame. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 312, 65–83.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. F. & Moss, J. B. 1969 The effect of the large hydrogen-dissociation activation energy on an equilibrium-broadened hydrogen-oxygen diffusion flame. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 313, 433–443.Google Scholar
Cohen, C.B., Bromberg, R. & Lipkis, R.P. 1958 Boundary layers with chemical reactions due to mass addition. Jet Propulsion, 28, 659–668.Google Scholar
Edelman, R. B., Fortune, O. & Weilerstein, G. 1972 Analytic study of gravity effects in laminar diffusion flames. Gen. Appl. Sci. Lab. Rep. TR-771. New York: Westbury.
Fendell, F. E. 1965 Ignition and extinction in combustion of initially unmixed reactants. J. Fluid Mech. 21, 281–303.Google Scholar
Fendell, F. E. 1967 Flame structure in initially unmixed reactants under one-step kinetics. Chem. Engng Sci. 22, 1829–1837.Google Scholar
Friedlander, S. K. & Keller, K. H. 1963 The structure of the zone of diffusion controlled reaction. Chem. Engng Sci. 18, 365–375.
Gibson, C. H. & Libby, P. A. 1972 On turbulent flows with fast chemical reaction. Part 2. The distribution of reactants and products near a reacting surface. Combustion Sci. Tech. 6, 29–35.Google Scholar
Grant, A. J., Jones, J. M. & Rosenfeld, J. L. J. 1973 Orderly structure and un-mixedness in lifted jet diffusion flames. Thorton Res. Centre Rep. Chester, England: Shell Research Ltd.
Gurevich, M. A. & Stepanov, A. M. 1973 Diffusion burning of a liquid-fuel drop in a two-oxidizer mixture. Combustion, Explosion & Shock Waves, 6, 218–220. [Trans. from Fiz. Goreniya i Vzrysa 6 (1970), 243–245.]Google Scholar
Hawthorne, W. R., Weddell, D. S. & Hottel, H. C. 1949 Mixing and combustion in turbulent gas jets. 3rd Symposium on Combustion and Flame and Explosion Phenomena, pp. 266–288. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
Kerber, R. L., Emanuel, G. & Whittier, J. S. 1972 Computer modelling and para-metric study for a pulsed H2 + F2 laser. Appl. Optics, 11, 1112–1123.Google Scholar
Klimov, A. M. 1967 On the mechanism of turbulent burning. Theory and Practice of Gas Burning, pp. 167–172. Leningrad: Nedra. (In Russian.)
Korman, H. F. 1970 Theoretical modelling of cool flames. Combustion Sci. Tech. 2, 149–519.Google Scholar
Krishnamurthy, L. & Williams, F. A. 1971 Kinetics and regression. Siam J. Appl. Math. 20, 590–611.Google Scholar
LIñan, A. 1963 Onthe structure of laminar diffusion flames. Aero. Engng thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena.
Otsuka, Y. & Niioka, T. 1972 On the deviation of the flame from the stagnation point in opposed-jet diffusion flames. Combustion & Flame, 19, 171–179.Google Scholar
Otsuka, Y. & Niioka, T. 1973 The one-dimensional diffusion flame in a two-dimensional counter-flow burner. Combustion & Flame, 21, 163–176.Google Scholar
Pearson, J. R. A. 1963 Diffusion of one substance into a semi-inhite medium containing another with second-order reaction. Appl. Sci. Res. A 11, 321–340.Google Scholar
Schetz, J. A. 1970 A simplified model for combustion of multicomponent fuels in air. Combustion & Flame, 15, 57–60.Google Scholar
Stewartson, K. 1964 The Theory of Laminar Boundary Layers in Compressible Fluids, chap. 6. Oxford University Press.
Tsuji, H. & Yamaoka, I. 1971 Structure analysis of counterflow diffusion flames in the forward stagnation region ofaporous cylinder. 13th Symp. (Int.) on Combustion, pp. 723–731. Pittsburgh: Combustion Institute.
Williams, F. A. 1965 Combustion Theory, chaps 1 and 3. Addison-Wesley.
Zeldovich, J. 1946 The oxidation of nitrogen in combustion and explosives. Acta Physiocochemica U.S.S.R. 21, 577–628.Google Scholar