Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T11:44:46.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dense gravity currents moving beneath progressive free-surface water waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2013

T. O. Robinson ,
I. Eames  and
R. Simons
T. O. Robinson*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
I. Eames
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, Torrington Place, London WC1E 7JE, UK
R. Simons
Affiliation:
Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The characteristics of dense gravity currents in coastal regions, where free-surface gravity waves are dominant, have yet to be studied in the laboratory. This paper provides a first insight into the dynamics of dense saline gravity currents moving beneath regular progressive free-surface water waves. The gravity currents were generated by releasing a finite volume of saline into a large wave tank with an established periodic wave field. After the initial collapse, the gravity currents propagated horizontally with two fronts, one propagating in the wave direction and the other against the wave direction. The fronts of the gravity currents oscillated with an amplitude and phase that correlated with the orbital velocities within a region close to the bed. To leading order, the overall length of the gravity current was found to be weakly affected by the wave action and the dynamics of the current could be approximated by simply considering the buoyancy of the released fluid. Other characteristics such as the position of the gravity current centre and the shape of the two leading profiles were found to be significantly affected by the wave action. The centre was displaced at constant speed dependent on the second-order wave-induced mean Lagrangian velocity. For long waves, the centre was advected downstream in the direction of wave propagation owing to the dominance of Stokes drift. For short waves, the gravity current centre moved upstream against the wave direction, as under these wave conditions Stokes drift is negligible at the bed. An asymmetry in the shape of the upstream and downstream current heads was observed, with the gravity current front moving against the waves being much thicker and the front steeper, similar to the case of a current moving in a stream.

JFM classification

Geophysical and Geological Flows: Gravity currents Multiphase and Particle-laden Flows: Multiphase flow Waves/Free-surface Flows: Surface gravity waves
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 725 , 25 June 2013 , pp. 588 - 610
Copyright
©2013 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adduce, C., Sciortino, G. & Proietti, S. 2012 Gravity currents produced by lock exchanges: experiments and simulations with a two-layer shallow-water model with entrainment. J. Hydraul. Engng 138 (2), 111–121.Google Scholar
Bagnold, R. A. 1946 Sand movements by waves: some small-scale experiments with sand of very low density. J. Inst. Civil Engrs 27, 447–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1968 Gravity currents and related phenomena. J. Fluid Mech. 31, 209–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bühler, J., Wright, S. J. & Kim, Y. 1991 Gravity currents advancing into a coflowing fluid. J. Hydraul. Res. 29 (2), 243–257.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, N. 2000 Wave-induced mixing within a gravity-driven surface current. PhD thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine.Google Scholar
Dahm, W. J. A. & Dimotakis, P. E. 1990 Mixing at large Schmidt number in the self-similar far field of turbulent jets. J. Fluid Mech. 217, 299–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyke, P. P. G & Barstow, S. F. 1981 Wave induced mass transport: theory and experiment. J. Hydraul. Res. 19, 89–105.Google Scholar
Eames, I. 2008 Settling of particles beneath water waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 38, 2846–2853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eames, I. & McIntyre, M. 1999 On the connection between Stokes drift and Darwin drift. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 126, 171–174.Google Scholar
Fourier, J. 1890 Mémoire sur la propagation de la chaleur dans les corps solides, présenté le 21 décembre 1807 à l’Institut national – Nouveau Bulletin des sciences par la Société philomatique de Paris I (6). Paris: Bernard. March 1808. pp. 112–116. Reprinted in ‘Mémoire sur la propagation de la chaleur dans les corps solides’. Joseph Fourier – Œuvres complètes, tome 2. pp. 215–221.Google Scholar
Hacker, J., Linden, P. F. & Dalziel, S. B. 1996 Mixing in lock-release gravity currents. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 24, 183–195.Google Scholar
Hallworth, M. A., Hogg, A. J & Huppert, H. E. 1998 Effects of external flow on compositional and particle gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 359, 109–142.Google Scholar
Hogg, A. J. & Huppert, H. E. 2001 Spreading and deposition of particulate matter in uniform flows. J. Hydraul. Res. 39, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, A. J., Huppert, H. E. & Hallworth, M. A. 2005 On gravity currents driven by constant fluxes of saline and particle-laden fluid in the presence of a uniform flow. J. Fluid Mech. 539, 349–385.Google Scholar
Huppert, H. E. 2006 Gravity currents: a personal perspective. J. Fluid Mech. 554, 299–322.Google Scholar
Huppert, H. E. & Simpson, J. E. 1980 Slumping of gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 99, 785–799.Google Scholar
Johns, B. 1970 On the mass transport induced by oscillatory flow in a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 43, 177–185.Google Scholar
von Kármán, T. 1940 The engineer grapples with nonlinear problems. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 46, 615–683.Google Scholar
Kranenburg, C. 1993 Gravity-current fronts advancing into horizontal ambient flow. J. Hydraul. Engng 119, 369–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lighthill, J. 1978 Waves in Fluids, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1953 Mass transport in water waves. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 245, 535–581.Google Scholar
Lowe, R. J., Rottman, J. W. & Linden, P. F. 2005 The non-Boussinesq lock-exchange problem. Part 1. Theory and experiments. J. Fluid Mech. 537, 101–124.Google Scholar
Marino, B. M., Thomas, L. P. & Linden, P. F. 2005 The front condition for gravity currents. J. Fluid Mech. 536, 49–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne-Thomson, L. M. 1968 Theoretical Hydrodynamics, 6th edn. Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monismith, S. G., Cowen, E. A., Nepf, H. M., Magnaudet, J. & Thais, L. 2007 Laboratory observations of mean flows under surface gravity waves. J. Fluid Mech. 573, 131–147.Google Scholar
Mueschke, N. J., Schilling, O., Youngs, D. L. & Andrews, M. J. 2009 Mixing at large Schmidt number in the self-similar far field of turbulent jets. J. Fluid Mech. 632, 17–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, C.-O. & Fu, S.-C. 2002 On the propagation of a two-dimensional viscous density current under surface waves. Phys. Fluids 14 (3), 970–984.Google Scholar
Nielsen, P. 1992 Coastal Bottom Boundary Layers and Sediment Transport. World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, T. O. 2007 Gravity current in the presence of water waves. PhD thesis, University College London.Google Scholar
Rottman, J. W. & Simpson, J. E. 1983 Gravity currents produced by insantaneous releases of a heavy fluid in a rectangular channel. J. Fluid Mech. 135, 95–110.Google Scholar
Russell, R. C. H. & Osorio, J. D. C. 1957 An experimental investigation of drift profiles in a closed channel. Coast. Engng 1, 171–183.Google Scholar
Shin, J. O., Dalziel, S. B. & Linden, P. F. 2004 Gravity currents produced by lock exchange. J. Fluid Mech. 521, 1–34.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. E. 1997 Gravity Currents in the Environment and the Laboratory, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. E. & Britter, R. E. 1979 The dynamics of the head of a gravity current advancing over a horizontal surface. J. Fluid Mech. 94, 477–495.Google Scholar
Skogness, K. & Johansen, Ø. 2004 Statmap – a three-dimensional model for oil spill risk assessment. Environ. Model. Softw. 19, 727–736.Google Scholar
Slim, A. C. & Huppert, H. E. 2008 Gravity currents from a line source in an ambient flow. J. Fluid Mech. 606, 1–26.Google Scholar
Stokes, G. G. 1847 On the theory of oscillatory waves. Trans. Camb. Phil. Soc. 8, 441–455.Google Scholar
Swan, C. 1990 Convection within an experimental wave flume. J. Hydraulic. Res. 28, 273–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swan, C. & Sleath, J. F. A. 1990 A second approximation to the time-mean Lagrangian drift beneath a series of progressive gravity waves. Ocean Engng 17, 65–79.Google Scholar
Wright, L. D., Friedrichs, C. T. & Scully, M. E. 2001 Effects of ambient currents and waves on gravity-driven sediment transport on continental shelves. Mar. Geol. 175, 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, L., Wiseman, W., Bornhold, D., Prior, D., Suhayda, J., Keller, G., Yang, Z.-S. & Fan, Y. 1988 Marine dispersal and deposition of yellow river silts by gravity-driven underflows. Nature 332, 629–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Z. & Bowen, A. J. 1994 Wave- and wind-driven flow in water of finite depth. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 24, 1850–1866.Google Scholar
Xue, M., Xu, Q. & Droegemeier, K. K. 1997 A theoretical and numerical study of density currents in non-constant shear flows. J. Atmos. Sci. 54, 1998–2019.Google Scholar