Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:54:47.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Concentration of vorticity in a destabilized vortex due to selective decay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2016

Yuji Hattori*
Affiliation:
Institute of Fluid Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8577, Japan
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

The formation of concentrated vortices like tornadoes and tropical cyclones in rotating fluids is of much interest in atmospheric flows. It is shown by direct numerical simulation that the selective decay of inviscid invariants leads to concentration of vorticity in a destabilized vortex. By selective decay we mean here that the circulation of the mean flow decays faster than the angular momentum or energy. Initially localized disturbances are superimposed onto the two-dimensional flattened Taylor–Green vortices to trigger the elliptic instability. In the later stage of nonlinear evolution of the disturbance circulation decays faster than angular momentum and energy, giving rise to a sharp peak in the vorticity distribution of the mean flow. During the selective decay vortex pairs reconnect and eventually annihilate at the cell boundaries of the Taylor–Green vortices. By evaluating the weight function of the inviscid invariants it is shown that the loss of angular momentum is much smaller than that of circulation when vorticity is lost at the cell boundary by reconnection or annihilation. Thus the reconnection and subsequent annihilation of vortex pairs is responsible for the selective decay and concentration of vorticity. The relevance of the mechanism to previous experiments and general cases is also discussed.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2016 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakas, N. A. & Ioannou, P. J. 2013 On the mechanism underlying the spontaneous emergence of barotropic zonal jets. J. Atmos. Sci. 70, 22512271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boratav, O. N., Pelz, R. B. & Zabusky, N. J. 1992 Reconnection in orthogonally interacting vortex tubes—direct numerical simulations and quantifications. Phys. Fluids A 4, 581605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretherton, F. P. & Turner, J. S. 1968 On the mixing of angular momentum in a stirred rotating fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 32, 449464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, D. O. & Lynden-Bell, D. 1968 Vorticity expulsion by turbulence: astrophysical implications of an Alka–Seltzer experiment. J. Fluid Mech. 32, 437447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hattori, Y. & bin Marzuki, M. S. 2014 Evolution of localized disturbances in the elliptic instability. J. Fluid Mech. 755, 603627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopfinger, E. J., Browand, F. K. & Gagne, Y. 1982 Turbulence and waves in a rotating disk. J. Fluid Mech. 125, 505534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibbetson, A. & Tritton, D. J. 1975 Experiments on turbulence in a rotating fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 68, 639672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, R. 2013 Swirling, turbulent vortex rings formed from a chain reaction of reconnection events. Phys. Fluids 25, 065101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerswell, R. R. 2002 Elliptical instability. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 34, 83113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kida, S., Takaoka, M. & Hussain, F. 1991 Collision of 2 vortex rings. J. Fluid Mech. 230, 583646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legras, B. & Dritschel, D. 1993 Vortex stripping and the generation of high vorticity gradients in 2-dimensional flows. Appl. Sci. Res. 51, 445455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundgren, T. S. & Mansour, N. N. 1996 Transition to turbulence in an elliptic vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 307, 4362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshally, J. S., Brancher, P. & Giovannini, A. 2001 Interaction of unequal anti-parallel vortex tubes. J. Fluid Mech. 446, 229252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEwan, A. D. 1973 A laboratory demonstration of angular momentum mixing. Geophys. Fluid Dyn. 5, 283311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEwan, A. D. 1976 Angular momentum diffusion and the initiation of cyclones. Nature 260, 126128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melander, M. V. & Hussain, F. 1993 Coupling between a coherent structure and fine-scale turbulence. Phys. Rev. E 48, 26692689.Google ScholarPubMed
Rüdiger, G., Tschäpe, R. & Kitchatinov, L. L. 2002 Negative Reynolds stress generation by accretion disc convection. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 332, 435440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffman, P. G. 1992. Vortex Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scorer, R. S. 1966 Origin of cyclones. Sci. J. 2, 4652.Google Scholar
Sipp, D. & Jacquin, L. 1998 Elliptic instability in two-dimensional flattened Taylor–Green vortices. Phys. Fluids 10, 839849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivashinsky, G. I. 1983 Negative viscosity effect in large-scale turbulence. Long-wave instability of a periodic system of eddies. Phys. Lett. 95A, 152154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strittmatter, P. A., Illingworth, G. & Freeman, K. C. 1970 A note on the vorticity expulsion hypothesis. J. Fluid Mech. 43, 539544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, N., Ishii, H. & Miyazaki, T. 2005 The influence of turbulence on a columnar vortex. Phys. Fluids 17, 035105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waleffe, F. 1990 On the three-dimensional instability of strained vortices. Phys. Fluids A 2, 7680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar