Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:21:17.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The collective dynamics of self-propelled particles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2008

VISHWAJEET MEHANDIA  and
PRABHU R. NOTT
VISHWAJEET MEHANDIA
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, India
PRABHU R. NOTT*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, India
*
†Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We propose a method for the dynamic simulation of a collection of self-propelled particles in a viscous Newtonian fluid. We restrict attention to particles whose size and velocity are small enough that the fluid motion is in the creeping flow regime. We propose a simple model for a self-propelled particle, and extended the Stokesian Dynamics method to conduct dynamic simulations of a collection of such particles. In our description, each particle is treated as a sphere with an orientation vector p, whose locomotion is driven by the action of a force dipole Sp of constant magnitude S0 at a point slightly displaced from its centre. To simplify the calculation, we place the dipole at the centre of the particle, and introduce a virtual propulsion force Fp to effect propulsion. The magnitude F0 of this force is proportional to S0. The directions of Sp and Fp are determined by p. In isolation, a self-propelled particle moves at a constant velocity u0p, with the speed u0 determined by S0. When it coexists with many such particles, its hydrodynamic interaction with the other particles alters its velocity and, more importantly, its orientation. As a result, the motion of the particle is chaotic. Our simulations are not restricted to low particle concentration, as we implement the full hydrodynamic interactions between the particles, but we restrict the motion of particles to two dimensions to reduce computation. We have studied the statistical properties of a suspension of self-propelled particles for a range of the particle concentration, quantified by the area fraction φa. We find several interesting features in the microstructure and statistics. We find that particles tend to swim in clusters wherein they are in close proximity. Consequently, incorporating the finite size of the particles and the near-field hydrodynamic interactions is of the essence. There is a continuous process of breakage and formation of the clusters. We find that the distributions of particle velocity at low and high φa are qualitatively different; it is close to the normal distribution at high φa, in agreement with experimental measurements. The motion of the particles is diffusive at long time, and the self-diffusivity decreases with increasing φa. The pair correlation function shows a large anisotropic build-up near contact, which decays rapidly with separation. There is also an anisotropic orientation correlation near contact, which decays more slowly with separation. Movies are available with the online version of the paper.

JFM classification

Biological Fluid Dynamics: Micro-organism dynamics Complex Fluids: Suspensions
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 595 , 25 January 2008 , pp. 239 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Batchelor, G. K. & Green, J. T. 1972 The hydrodynamic interaction of two small freely-moving spheres in a linear flow field. J. Fluid Mech. 56, 375–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, J. F. & Bossis, G. 1988 Stokesian dynamics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, J. F. & Morris, J. F. 1997 Microstructure of strongly sheared suspensions and its impact on rheology and diffusion. J. Fluid Mech. 348, 103–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, J. F., Phillips, R. J., Lester, J. C. & Bossis, G. 1988 Dynamic simulation of hydrodynamically interacting suspensions. J. Fluid Mech. 195, 257–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnahan, N. F. & Starling, K. E. 1969 Equation of state of nonattracting rigid spheres. J. Chem. Phys. 51, 635–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childress, S. 1981 Mechanics of Swimming and Flying. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childress, S., Levandowsky, M. & Spiegel, E. A. 1975 Pattern formation in a suspension of swimming micro-organisms. J. Fluid Mech. 69, 591–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dombrowski, C., Cisneros, L., Chatkaew, S., Goldstein, R. E. & Kessler, J. O. 2004 Self-concentration and large-scale coherence in bacterial dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 098103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durlofsky, L., Brady, J. F. & Bossis, G. 1987 Dynamic simulation of hydrodynamically interacting particles. J. Fluid Mech. 180, 21–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernandez-Ortiz, J. P., Stoltz, C. G. & Graham, M. D. 2005 Transport and collective dynamics in suspension of confined swimming particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 204501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, N. A., Pedley, T. J. & Kessler, J. O. 1989 Growth of bioconvection patterns in a suspension of gyrotactic micro-organisms in a layer of finite depth. J. Fluid Mech. 208, 509–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishikawa, T., Simmonds, M. P. & Pedley, T. J. 2006 Hydrodynamic interaction of two swimming model micro-organisms. J. Fluid Mech. 568, 119–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffrey, D. J., Morris, J. F. & Brady, J. F. 1993 The pressure moments for two spheres in a low-Reynolds-number flow. Phys. Fluids A 5, 2317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, M. S., Baron, L. Le & Pedley, T. J. 1994 Biflagellate gyrotaxis in a shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 281, 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, J. O. 1986 Individual and collective dynamics of swimming cells. J. Fluid Mech. 173, 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S. & Karrila, S. J. 1991 Microhydrodynamics: Principles and Selected Applications. Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
Leighton, D. & Acrivos, A. 1987 a Measurement of shear-induced self-diffusion in concentrated suspensions of spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 109–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighton, D. & Acrivos, A. 1987 b The shear-induced migration of particles in concentrated suspensions. J. Fluid Mech. 181, 415–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lighthill, J. 1976 Flagellar hyrodynamics. SIAM Rev. 18, 161–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1952 On the squirming motion of nearly spherical deformable bodies through liquids at very small Reynolds numbers. Commun. Pure Appl. Maths 5, 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llopis, I. & Pagonabarraga, I. 2006 Dynamic regimes of hydrodynamically coupled self-propelling particles. Europhys. Lett. 75, 999–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melkonian, M. 1992 Algal Cell Motility. Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Morris, J. F. & Brady, J. F. 1996 Self-diffusion in sheared suspensions. J. Fluid Mech. 312, 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, J. F. & Katyal, B. 2002 Microstructure from simulated Brownian suspension flows at large shear rate. Phys. Fluids 14, 1920–1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nott, P. R. & Brady, J. F. 1994 Pressure-driven flow of suspensions: Simulation and theory. J. Fluid Mech. 275, 157–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsi, F. & Gadala-Maria, F. 1987 Fore-and-aft asymmetry in a concentrated suspension of solid spheres. J. Rheol. 31, 725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedley, T. J., Hill, N. A. & Kessler, J. O. 1988 The growth of bioconvection patterns in a uniform suspension of gyrotactic micro-organisms. J. Fluid Mech. 195, 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedley, T. J. & Kessler, J. O. 1990 A new continuum model for suspensions of gyrotactic micro-organisms. J. Fluid Mech. 180, 155–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedley, T. J. & Kessler, J. O. 1992 Hydrodynamic phenomena in suspensions of swimming micro-organisms. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 24, 313–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phung, T. N., Brady, J. F. & Bossis, G. 1996 Stokesian dynamics simulation of Brownian suspensions. J. Fluid Mech. 313, 181–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purcell, E. M. 1977 Life at low Reynolds number. Am. J. Phys. 45, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramachandran, S., Sunil Kumar, P. B. & Pagonabarraga, I. 2006 A lattice-Boltzmann model for suspensions of self-propelling colloidal particles. Eur. Phys. J. E 20, 151–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sierou, A. & Brady, J. F. 2001 Accelerated Stokesian dynamics. J. Fluid Mech. 448, 115–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sierou, A. & Brady, J. F. 2002 Rheology and microstructure in concentrated non-colloidal suspensions. J. Rheol. 46, 1031–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simha, R. A. & Ramaswamy, S. 2002 Hydrodynamic fluctuations and instabilities in ordered suspensions of self-propelled particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 58101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, A. & Nott, P. R. 2000 Normal stresses and microstructure in bounded sheared suspensions via Stokesian dynamics simulations. J. Fluid Mech. 412, 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, A. & Nott, P. R. 2003 Experimental measurements of the normal stresses in sheared Stokesian suspensions. J. Fluid Mech. 490, 293–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1951 Analysis of the swimming of microscopic organisms. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 209, 447.Google Scholar
Toner, J. & Tu, Y. 1995 Long range order in a two-dimensional dynamical xy model: how birds fly together. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vicsek, T., Czirok, A., Ben-Jacob, E., Cohen, I. & Shochet, O. 1995 Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wager, H. 1911 On the effect of gravity upon the movements and aggregation of Euglena viridis, Ehrb., and other micro-organisms. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 201, 333–390.Google Scholar
Wu, X. L. & Libchaber, A. 2000 Particle diffusion in quasi-two-dimensional bacterial bath. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zarraga, I. E., Hill, D. A. & Leighton, D. T. 2000 The characterization of the total stress of concentrated suspensions of noncolloidal spheres in Newtonian fluids. J. Rheol. 44, 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mehandia and Nott supplementary movie

Movie 1. Simulation of a suspension of self-propelled particles of concentration Φa=0.05. The arrows indicate the orientation vectors of the particles. Note the frequent occurrence of pairs and larger clusters, in which the particles are in close proximity. The tendency of neighbours to align and swim one behind the other is also evident.

Download Mehandia and Nott supplementary movie(Video)
Video 32 MB

Mehandia and Nott supplementary movie

Movie 1. Simulation of a suspension of self-propelled particles of concentration Φa=0.05. The arrows indicate the orientation vectors of the particles. Note the frequent occurrence of pairs and larger clusters, in which the particles are in close proximity. The tendency of neighbours to align and swim one behind the other is also evident.

Download Mehandia and Nott supplementary movie(Video)
Video 8.5 MB

Mehandia and Nott supplementary movie

Movie 2. Same as movie 1, but with particle concentration Φa=0.1.

Download Mehandia and Nott supplementary movie(Video)
Video 29 MB

Mehandia and Nott supplementary movie

Movie 2. Same as movie 1, but with particle concentration Φa=0.1.

Download Mehandia and Nott supplementary movie(Video)
Video 10.2 MB