Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:58:35.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A coherence-matched linear source mechanism for subsonic jet noise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2015

Yamin B. Baqui ,
Anurag Agarwal ,
André V. G. Cavalieri  and
Samuel Sinayoko
Yamin B. Baqui
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK
Anurag Agarwal*
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK
André V. G. Cavalieri
Affiliation:
Divisão de Engenharia Aeronáutica, Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica, 12228-900 São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil
Samuel Sinayoko
Affiliation:
Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigate source mechanisms for subsonic jet noise using experimentally obtained datasets of high-Reynolds-number Mach 0.4 and 0.6 turbulent jets. The focus is on the axisymmetric mode which dominates downstream sound radiation for low polar angles and the frequency range at which peak noise occurs. A linearized Euler equation (LEE) solver with an inflow boundary condition is used to generate single-frequency hydrodynamic instability waves, and the resulting near-field fluctuations and far-field acoustics are compared with those from experiments and linear parabolized stability equation (LPSE) computations. It is found that the near-field velocity fluctuations closely agree with experiments and LPSE computations up to the end of the potential core, downstream of which deviations occur, but the LEE results match experiments better than the LPSE results. Both the near-field wavepackets and the sound field are observed directly from LEE computations, but the far-field sound pressure levels (SPLs) obtained are more than an order of magnitude lower than experimental values despite close statistical agreement of the near hydrodynamic field up to the potential core region. We explore the possibility that this discrepancy is due to the mismatch between the decay of two-point coherence with increasing distance in experimental flow fluctuations and the perfect coherence in linear models. To match the near-field coherence, experimentally obtained coherence profiles are imposed on the two-point cross-spectral density (CSD) at cylindrical and conical surfaces that enclose near-field structures generated with LEEs. The surface pressure is propagated to the far field using boundary value formulations based on the linear wave equation. Coherence matching yields far-field SPLs which show improved agreement with experimental results, indicating that coherence decay is the main missing component in linear models. The CSD on the enclosing surfaces reveals that the application of a decaying coherence profile spreads the hydrodynamic component of the linear wavepacket source on to acoustic wavenumbers, resulting in a more efficient acoustic source.

JFM classification

Acoustics: Acoustics Acoustics: Aeroacoustics Acoustics: Jet noise
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 776 , 10 August 2015 , pp. 235 - 267
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2015 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agarwal, A., Morris, P. J. & Mani, R. 2004 Calculation of sound propagation in non-uniform flows: suppression of instability waves. AIAA J. 42 (1), 80–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, R. R., Michalke, A. & Fuchs, H. V. 1977 Coherent structures in jet turbulence and noise. AIAA J. 15 (7), 1011–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodony, D. & Jambunathan, R.2012 On the linearity of the quieting of high speed mixing layers by heating. In 18th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Colorado Springs, CO, USA, AIAA Paper 2012-2119.Google Scholar
Breakey, D. E., Jordan, P., Cavalieri, A. V., Léon, O., Zhang, M., Lehnasch, G., Colonius, T. & Rodrıguez, D.2013 Near-field wavepackets and the far-field sound of a subsonic jet. In 19th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Berlin, Germany, AIAA Paper 2013-2083.Google Scholar
Cavalieri, A. V. & Agarwal, A. 2014 Coherence decay and its impact on sound radiation by wavepackets. J. Fluid Mech. 748, 399–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavalieri, A. V., Jordan, P., Agarwal, A. & Gervais, Y. 2011 Jittering wave-packet models for subsonic jet noise. J. Sound Vib. 330 (18), 4474–4492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavalieri, A. V., Jordan, P., Colonius, T. & Gervais, Y. 2012 Axisymmetric superdirectivity in subsonic jets. J. Fluid Mech. 704, 388–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavalieri, A. V., Rodríguez, D., Jordan, P., Colonius, T. & Gervais, Y. 2013 Wavepackets in the velocity field of turbulent jets. J. Fluid Mech. 730, 559–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crighton, D. & Gaster, M. 1976 Stability of slowly diverging jet flow. J. Fluid Mech. 77 (02), 397–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crow, S.1972 Acoustic gain of a turbulent jet. In Phys. Soc. Meeting, Univ. Colorado, Boulder, Paper IE, Vol. 6.Google Scholar
Crow, S. C. & Champagne, F. 1971 Orderly structure in jet turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 48 (03), 547–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dieste, M. & Gabard, G.2009 Synthetic turbulence applied to broadband interaction noise. In 15th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Miami, FL, USA, AIAA Paper 2009-3267.Google Scholar
Ffowcs Williams, J. & Kempton, A. 1978 The noise from the large-scale structure of a jet. J. Fluid Mech. 84 (04), 673–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freund, J. B. 2001 Noise sources in a low-Reynolds-number turbulent jet at Mach 0.9. J. Fluid Mech. 438, 277–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freund, J. B., Lele, S. K. & Moin, P. 1996 Calculation of the radiated sound field using an open Kirchhoff surface. AIAA J. 34 (5), 909–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, H. V. & Michel, U. 1978 Experimental evidence of turbulent source coherence affecting jet noise. AIAA J. 16 (9), 871–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, M. 2003 A generalized acoustic analogy. J. Fluid Mech. 488, 315–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gudmundsson, K. & Colonius, T. 2011 Instability wave models for the near-field fluctuations of turbulent jets. J. Fluid Mech. 689, 97–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, P. & Colonius, T. 2013 Wave packets and turbulent jet noise. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 45, 173–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, J. & Yen, T.-C. 1983 Noise generation by a low-Mach-number jet. J. Fluid Mech. 134, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1952 On sound generated aerodynamically. I. General theory. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 211 (1107), 564–587.Google Scholar
Mankbadi, R. & Liu, J. 1984 Sound generated aerodynamically revisited: large-scale structures in a turbulent jet as a source of sound. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 311 (1516), 183–217.Google Scholar
Michalke, A.1971 Instabilitaet eines kompressiblen runden Freistrahis unter Beruecksichtigung des Einflusses der Strahigrenzschichtdicke (instability of a compressible circular jet considering the influence of the thickness of the jet boundary layer). Tech. Rep. DTIC Document.Google Scholar
Michalke, A. & Fuchs, H. 1975 On turbulence and noise of an axisymmetric shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 70 (01), 179–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mollo-Christensen, E.1963 Measurements of near field pressure of subsonic jets. Tech. Rep. DTIC Document.Google Scholar
Moore, C. 1977 The role of shear-layer instability waves in jet exhaust noise. J. Fluid Mech. 80 (02), 321–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. B. 2000 Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reba, R., Narayanan, S. & Colonius, T. 2010 Wave-packet models for large-scale mixing noise. Intl J. Aeroacoust. 9 (4), 533–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrıguez, D., Sinha, A., Bres, G. A. & Colonius, T.2013 Acoustic field associated with parabolized stability equation models in turbulent jets. In 19th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Berlin, Germany, AIAA Paper 2013-2279.Google Scholar
Sinayoko, S., Agarwal, A. & Hu, Z. 2011 Flow decomposition and aerodynamic sound generation. J. Fluid Mech. 668, 335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, A., Rodríguez, D., Brès, G. A. & Colonius, T. 2014 Wavepacket models for supersonic jet noise. J. Fluid Mech. 742, 71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suponitsky, V., Sandham, N. D. & Morfey, C. L. 2010 Linear and nonlinear mechanisms of sound radiation by instability waves in subsonic jets. J. Fluid Mech. 658, 509–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, T. & Colonius, T. 2006 Instability waves in a subsonic round jet detected using a near-field phased microphone array. J. Fluid Mech. 565, 197–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tam, C. K. & Webb, J. C. 1993 Dispersion-relation-preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics. J. Comput. Phys. 107 (2), 262–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, M., Jordan, P., Lehnasch, G., Cavalieri, A. V. & Agarwal, A.2014 Just enough jitter for jet noise? In 19th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA, AIAA Paper 2014-3061.Google Scholar