Hostname: page-component-6587cd75c8-h2j7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T02:08:57.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessing the predictability of random ocean waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2025

Alexis Mérigaud*
Affiliation:
IFP Énergies Nouvelles (IFPEN), 92500 Rueil-Malmaison, France
Jiamin Zhu
Affiliation:
IFP Énergies Nouvelles (IFPEN), 92500 Rueil-Malmaison, France
Paolino Tona
Affiliation:
IFP Énergies Nouvelles (IFPEN), 92500 Rueil-Malmaison, France
*
Corresponding author: Alexis Mérigaud, [email protected]

Abstract

Real-time wave forecasting (RTWF) consists in predicting ocean wave motion or forces, from seconds to minutes in advance, using real-time measurements. For the successful development of RTWF, understanding wave predictability is essential. Usually, a deterministic ‘predictable zone’ (DPZ) is geometrically constructed from the wave group velocities and directions present in the spectrum. DPZs have little experimental evidence, and suffer ambiguities regarding the choice of cutoff frequencies and directions – since actual ocean waves are not band-limited. The present study addresses those shortcomings, by defining probabilistic predictable zones (PPZs) with respect to chosen uncertainty thresholds, using a rigorous statistical framework restricted to near-Gaussian sea states (precisely those where RTWF would be employed). PPZs are examined in idealised spectra and in a stereo dataset of a real wave field. It is shown that the PPZ geometry is quantitatively related to the sea state characteristics, through three physical parameters: two limiting group velocities (similar to the deterministic theory), and a directional spreading effect, which also limits the PPZ extent. While the lower group velocity depends on the chosen uncertainty threshold, the upper group velocity is better approximated by that of the spectrum peak frequency, which is a novel finding. The empirical data support the validity of the present PPZ theory. In contrast, both theoretical and empirical results contradict the fan-shaped predictable zones, constructed in the three-dimensional deterministic theory, thus highlighting the importance of considering stochasticity to understand the predictability of actual ocean waves.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abusedra, L. & Belmont, M. 2011 Prediction diagrams for deterministic sea wave prediction and the introduction of the data extension prediction method. Intl. Shipbuilding Prog. 58 (1), 5981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Ani, M., Belmont, M. & Christmas, J. 2020 Sea trial on deterministic sea waves prediction using wave-profiling radar. Ocean Engng 207, 107297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Ani, M., Christmas, J., Belmont, M., Duncan, J.M., Duncan, J. & Ferrier, B. 2019 Deterministic sea waves prediction using mixed space–time wave radar data. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 36 (5), 833842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ardhuin, F., Gille, S.T., Menemenlis, D., Rocha, C.B., Rascle, N., Chapron, B., Gula, J. & Molemaker, J. 2017 Small-scale open ocean currents have large effects on wind wave heights. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 122 (6), 45004517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belmont, M., Al-Ani, M., Challenor, P., Christmas, J. & Wilson, P. 2019 Obtaining the distribution of quiescent periods directly from the power spectral densities of sea waves. Appl. Ocean Res. 85, 6572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belmont, M., Christmas, J., Dannenberg, J., Hilmer, T., Duncan, J., Duncan, J.M. & Ferrier, B. 2014 An examination of the feasibility of linear deterministic sea wave prediction in multidirectional seas using wave profiling radar: theory, simulation, and sea trials. J. Atmos. Ocean. Techol. 31 (7), 16011614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benetazzo, A., Bergamasco, F., Yoo, J., Cavaleri, L., Kim, S.-S., Bertotti, L., Barbariol, F. & Shim, J.-S. 2018 Characterizing the signature of a spatio-temporal wind wave field. Ocean Model. 129, 104123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desmars, N., Hartmann, M., Behrendt, J., Hoffmann, N. & Klein, M. 2023 Nonlinear deterministic reconstruction and prediction of remotely measured ocean surface waves. J. Fluid Mech. 975, A8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
From, P.J., Gravdahl, J.T., Lillehagen, T. & Abbeel, P. 2011 Motion planning and control of robotic manipulators on seaborne platforms. Control Engng Practice 19 (8), 809819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fucile, F., Bulian, G. & Lugni, C. 2018 Prediction error statistics in deterministic linear ship motion forecasting. In ASME 2018 37th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, pp. V07AT06A003. ASME.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goda, Y. 1975 Computation of refraction and diffraction of sea waves with mitsuyasu’s directional spectrum. Tech. Note of Port and Harbour Res. Inst. 230, 45.Google Scholar
Hasselmann, K. et al. 1973 Measurements of wind-wave growth and swell decay during the Joint North Sea Wave Project (JONSWAP). Deuterium Hydrogen Z 8, 195.Google Scholar
Hlophe, T., Taylor, P.H., Kurniawan, A., Orszaghova, J. & Wolgamot, H. 2023 Phase-resolved wave prediction in highly spread seas using optimised arrays of buoys. Appl. Ocean Res. 130, 103435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hlophe, T., Wolgamot, H., Kurniawan, A., Taylor, P.H., Orszaghova, J. & Draper, S. 2021 Fast wave-by-wave prediction of weakly nonlinear unidirectional wave fields. Appl. Ocean Res. 112, 102695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hlophe, T., Wolgamot, H., Taylor, P.H., Kurniawan, A., Orszaghova, J. & Draper, S. 2022 Wave-by-wave prediction in weakly nonlinear and narrowly spread seas using fixed-point surface-elevation time histories. Appl. Ocean Res. 122, 103112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huchet, M., Babarit, A., Ducrozet, G., Ferrant, P., Gilloteaux, J.-C. & Droniou, E. 2023 Experimental assessment of a nonlinear, deterministic sea wave prediction method using instantaneous velocity profiles. Ocean Engng 281, 114739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, I.-C., Ducrozet, G., Bonnefoy, F., Leroy, V. & Perignon, Y. 2023 Real-time phase-resolved ocean wave prediction in directional wave fields: enhanced algorithm and experimental validation. Ocean Engng 276, 114212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, M., Dudek, M., Clauss, G.F., Ehlers, S., Behrendt, J., Hoffmann, N. & Onorato, M. 2020 On the deterministic prediction of water waves. Fluids 5 (1), 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köllisch, N., Behrendt, J., Klein, M. & Hoffmann, N. 2018 Nonlinear real time prediction of ocean surface waves. Ocean Engng 157, 387400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, Y.Z., Santo, H., Lim, K.Y. & Chan, E.S. 2020 Deterministic wave prediction for unidirectional sea-states in real-time using artificial neural network. Ocean Engng 195, 106722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, R., Zhang, J., Zhao, X., Wang, D., Hann, M. & Greaves, D. 2023 Phase-resolved real-time forecasting of three-dimensional ocean waves via machine learning and wave tank experiments. Appl. Energy 348, 121529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, Y., Sclavounos, P.D., Cross-Whiter, J. & Arora, D. 2018 Wave forecast and its application to the optimal control of offshore floating wind turbine for load mitigation. Renew. Energy 128, 163176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisner, E., Galvagno, M., Andrade, D., Liberzon, D. & Stuhlmeier, R. 2023 Wave-by-wave forecasts in directional seas using nonlinear dispersion corrections. Phys. Fluids 35 (6), 062104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mérigaud, A., Herterich, J., Flanagan, J., Ringwood, J. & Dias, F. 2018 Incorporating wave spectrum information in real-time free-surface elevation forecasting: Real-sea experiments. In Proceedings of the 11th IFAC Conference on Control Applications in Marine Systems, Robotics, and Vehicles, Opatija, Croatia, 2018 (CAMS 2018), vol. 51, pp. 232237. Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mérigaud, A. & Ringwood, J.V. 2018 a Incorporating ocean wave spectrum information in short-term free-surface elevation forecasting. IEEE J. Oceanic Engng 99, 114.Google Scholar
Mérigaud, A. & Ringwood, J.V. 2018 b Towards realistic non-linear receding-horizon spectral control of wave energy converters. Control Engng Practice 81, 145161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mérigaud, A. & Tona, P. 2022 A stochastic approach to short-term ocean wave forecasting: Preliminary results using data from a remote sensing imaging system. In ASME 2022 41st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naaijen, P., Trulsen, K. & Blondel-Couprie, E. 2014 Limits to the extent of the spatio-temporal domain for deterministic wave prediction. Intl Shipbuilding Prog. 61 (3-4), 203223.Google Scholar
Ochi, M.K. 2005 Ocean Waves: the Stochastic Approach. Vol. 6. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Papoulis, A. & Pillai, S.U. 2002 Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Pierson, W.J. 1952 A unified mathematical theory for the analysis, propagation and refraction of storm-generated ocean surface waves, part 1 and 2. NYU, Coll. of Eng., Res. Div. 461. NYU.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qi, Y., Wu, G., Liu, Y., Kim, M.-H. & Yue, D.K.P. 2018 a Nonlinear phase-resolved reconstruction of irregular water waves. J. Fluid Mech. 838, 544572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qi, Y., Wu, G., Liu, Y. & Yue, D.K.P. 2018 b Predictable zone for phase-resolved reconstruction and forecast of irregular waves. Wave Motion 77, 195213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raach, S., Schlipf, D., Sandner, F., Matha, D. & Cheng, P.W. 2014 Nonlinear model predictive control of floating wind turbines with individual pitch control. In 2014 American Control Conference, pp. 44344439. IEEE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringwood, J.V., Bacelli, G. & Fusco, F. 2014 Energy-maximizing control of wave-energy converters: the development of control system technology to optimize their operation. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 34 (5), 3055.Google Scholar
Simanesew, A., Trulsen, K., Krogstad, H.E. & Nieto Borge, J.C. 2017 Surface wave predictions in weakly nonlinear directional seas. Appl. Ocean Res. 65, 7989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skaare, B., Nielsen, F.G., Hanson, T.D., Yttervik, R., Havmøller, O. & Rekdal, A. 2015 Analysis of measurements and simulations from the Hywind Demo floating wind turbine. Wind Energy 18 (6), 11051122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, A.J. 2011 A survey of dynamic positioning control systems. Annu. Rev. Control 35 (1), 123136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuhlmeier, R. & Stiassnie, M. 2021 Deterministic wave forecasting with the Zakharov equation. J. Fluid Mech. 913, A50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veras Guimãraes, P., Ardhuin, F., Bergamasco, F., Leckler, F., Filipot, J.F.c, Shim, J.-S., Dulov, V. & Benetazzo, A. 2020 A data set of sea surface stereo images to resolve space-time wave fields. Scientific Data 7 (1), 145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodacre, J.K., Bauer, R.J. & Irani, R.A. 2015 A review of vertical motion heave compensation systems. Ocean Engng 104, 140154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J., Zhao, X., Jin, S. & Greaves, D. 2022 Phase-resolved real-time ocean wave prediction with quantified uncertainty based on variational Bayesian machine learning. Appl. Energy 324, 119711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Mérigaud et al. supplementary material 1

Mérigaud et al. supplementary material
Download Mérigaud et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 31.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Mérigaud et al. supplementary material 2

Mérigaud et al. supplementary material
Download Mérigaud et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 52.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Mérigaud et al. supplementary material 3

Mérigaud et al. supplementary material
Download Mérigaud et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 55 KB
Supplementary material: File

Mérigaud et al. supplementary material 4

Mérigaud et al. supplementary material
Download Mérigaud et al. supplementary material 4(File)
File 34.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Mérigaud et al. supplementary material 5

Mérigaud et al. supplementary material
Download Mérigaud et al. supplementary material 5(File)
File 46.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Mérigaud et al. supplementary material 6

Mérigaud et al. supplementary material
Download Mérigaud et al. supplementary material 6(File)
File 38.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Mérigaud et al. supplementary material 7

Mérigaud et al. supplementary material
Download Mérigaud et al. supplementary material 7(File)
File 29.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Mérigaud et al. supplementary material 8

Mérigaud et al. supplementary material
Download Mérigaud et al. supplementary material 8(File)
File 32.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Mérigaud et al. supplementary material 9

Mérigaud et al. supplementary material
Download Mérigaud et al. supplementary material 9(File)
File 53.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Mérigaud et al. supplementary material 10

Mérigaud et al. supplementary material
Download Mérigaud et al. supplementary material 10(File)
File 36.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Mérigaud et al. supplementary material 11

Mérigaud et al. supplementary material
Download Mérigaud et al. supplementary material 11(File)
File 43.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Mérigaud et al. supplementary material 12

Mérigaud et al. supplementary material
Download Mérigaud et al. supplementary material 12(File)
File 454.6 KB