Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T21:40:06.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An analytic solution for two- and three-dimensional wings in ground effect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

Sheila E. Widnall  and
Timothy M. Barrows
Sheila E. Widnall
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Timothy M. Barrows
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The method of matched asymptotic expansions is applied to the problem of a wing of finite span in very close proximity to the ground. The general lifting surface problem is shown to be a direct problem, represented by a source-sink distribution on the upper surface of the wing and wake, with concentrated sources around the leading and side edges plus a separate confined channel flow region under the wing and wake. The two-dimensional flat plate airfoil is examined in detail and results for upper and lower surface pressure distribution and lift coefficient are compared with a numerical solution. A simple analytic solution is obtained for a flat wing with a straight trailing edge which has minimum induced drag. To lowest order, this optimally loaded wing has an elliptical planform and a lift distribution which is linear along the chord, resulting in a parabolic spanwise lift distribution. An expression for the lift coefficient at small clearance and angle of attack, valid for moderate aspect ratio, is derived. The analytic results show reasonable agreement when compared with numerical results from lifting surface theory.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , 15 May 1970 , pp. 769 - 792
Copyright
© 1970 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashley, H. & Landahl, M. 1965 Aerodynamics of Wings and Bodies. Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley.
Ashley, H., Widnall, S. & Landahl, M. 1965 New directions in lifting surface theory. AIAA J. 3, 3.Google Scholar
Bagley, J. A. 1960 Pressure distribution on two-dimensional wings near the ground. RAE Rep. Aero. 2625.Google Scholar
Barrows, T. M. & Widnall, S. E. 1970 Optimum lift-drag ratio for a ram wing tube vehicle. To appear in AIAA J.Google Scholar
Haller, P. de 1936 La portance et la trainée induite minimum d'une aile au voisinage du sol. Mitt. Inst. Aerodyn. Zurich, 5, 99.Google Scholar
Kaario, T. J. 1935 Process for eliminating friction between a surface vehicle and the surface. Finnish Patent, no. 18630.Google Scholar
Pistolesi, E. 1937 Ground effect—theory and practice. NACA TM no. 828.Google Scholar
Strand, T., Royce, W. W. & Fujita, T. 1962 Cruise performance of channel-flow ground effect machines. J. Aero. Sci. 29, 702.Google Scholar
Tomotika, S., Hasimoto, Z. & Urano, K. 1951 The forces acting on an aerofoil of approximate Joukowski type in a stream bounded by a plane wall. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 4, 289.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, M. 1964 Perturbation Methods in Fluid Mechanics. New York: Academic.