Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T04:28:17.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Algebraic probability density tails in decaying isotropic two-dimensional turbulence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Javier Jiménez
Javier Jiménez
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics, Pl. Cardenal Cisneros 3, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The p.d.f. of the velocity gradients in two-dimensional decaying isotropic turbulence is shown to approach a Cauchy distribution, with algebraic s−2 tails, as the flow becomes dominated by a large number of compact coherent vortices. The statistical argument is independent of the vortex structure, and depends only on general scaling properties. The same argument predicts a Gaussian p.d.f. for the velocity components. The convergence to these limits as a function of the number of vortices is analysed. It is found to be fast in the former case, but slow (logarithmic) in the latter, resulting in residual u−3 tails in all practical cases. The influence of a spread Gaussian vorticity distribution in the cores is estimated, and the relevant dimensionless parameter is identified as the area fraction covered by the cores. A comparison is made with the result of numerical simulations of two-dimensional decaying turbulence. The agreement of the p.d.f.s is excellent in the case of the gradients, and adequate in the case of the velocities. In the latter case the ratio between energy and enstrophy is computed, and agrees with the simulations. All the one-point statistics considered in this paper are consistent with a random arrangement of the vortex cores, with no evidence of energy screening.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 313 , 25 April 1996 , pp. 223 - 240
Copyright
© 1996 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anselmet, F., Gagne, Y., Hopfinger, E. J. & Antonia, R. A. 1984 High-order structure functions in turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 140, 63–89.Google Scholar
Arroyo, P., Pedrizzetti, G., Vasco, C. & Jimenez, J. 1995 Statistical properties of decaying two-dimensional turbulence. In Advances in Turbulence V ed. (R. Benzi), pp. 11–15. Kluwer.
Batchelor, G. K. & Townsend, A. A. 1949 The nature of turbulent motion at large wave numbers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 199, 238–255.Google Scholar
Bouchaud, J. P. & Georges, A. 1990 Anomalous diffusion in disordered media: statistical mechanisms, models and physical applications. Phys. Rep. 195, 127–293.Google Scholar
Brachet, M. E., Meneguzzi, M., Politano, H. & Sulem, P. L. 1988 The dynamics of freely decaying two-dimensional turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 194, 333–349.Google Scholar
Castaing, B., Gagne, Y. & Hopfinger, E. J. 1990 Velocity probability density functions of high Reynolds number turbulence. Physica D 46, 177–200.Google Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S. 1943 Stochastic problems in physics and astronomy. Rev. Mod. Phys. 15, 70–74. (Reprinted in Selected Papers on Noise and Stochastic Processes (ed. N. Wax). Dover 1954.)
Cizeau, P. & Bouchaud, J. P. 1993 Mean field theory of dilute spin-glasses with power-law interactions. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 26, L187–L193.Google Scholar
Feller, W. 1971 An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications (2nd Edn), vol. 2, pp. 169–172 and 574–581. Wiley.
Gurvich, A. S. & Yaglom, A. M. 1967 Breakdown of eddies and probability distributions for small-scale turbulence, boundary layers and turbulence. Phys. Fluids Suppl. 10, S 59–65.Google Scholar
Hosokawa, I. & Yamamoto, K. 1990 Intermittency of dissipation in directly simulated fully developed turbulence. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 59, 401–404.Google Scholar
Jiménez, J., Moffatt, H. K. & Vasco, C. 1996 The structure of the vortices in freely decaying two-dimensional turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 313, 209–222.Google Scholar
Jiménez, J., Wray, A. A., Saffman, P. G. & Rogallo, R. S. 1993 The structure of intense vorticity in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 255, 65–90.Google Scholar
Kailasnath, P., Sreenivasan, K. R. & Stolovitzky, G. 1992 Probability density of velocity increments in turbulent flows. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2766–2769.Google Scholar
Kerr, R. M. 1985 Higher order derivative correlation and the alignment of small-scale structures in isotropic numerical turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 153, 31–58.Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A. N. 1962 A refinement of previous hypotheses concerning the local structure of turbulence in a viscous incompressible fluid at high Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 13, 82–85.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1958 Introduction to Fourier Analysis and Generalised Functions, §4 and table I. Cambridge University Press.
Mandelbrot, B. B. 1974 Intermittent turbulence in self-similar cascades: divergence of high moments and dimension of the carrier. J. Fluid Mech. 62, 331–358.Google Scholar
Mandelbrot, B. B. 1982 The Fractal Geometry of Nature, §37. Freeman.
McWilliams, J. C. 1990 The vortices of two-dimensional turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 219, 361–385.Google Scholar
Meneveau, C. & Sreenivasan, K. R. 1991 The multifractal nature of the energy dissipation. J. Fluid Mech. 224, 429–484.Google Scholar
Novikov, E. A. 1971 Intermittency and scale similarity in the structure of a turbulent flow. Prikl. Mat. Mech. 35, 266–277.Google Scholar
Obukhov, A. M. 1962 Some specific features of atmospheric turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 13, 77–81.Google Scholar
Parisi, G. & Frisch, U. 1985 On the singularity structure of fully developed turbulence. In Turbulence and Predictability in Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (ed. M. Gil, R. Benzi & G. Parisi), pp. 84–88. North-Holland.
Pullin, D. I. & Saffman, P.G. 1993 On the Lundgren–Townsend model of turbulent fine scales. Phys. Fluids A 5, 126–145.Google Scholar
Ruelle, D. 1990 Is there screening in turbulence? J. Statist. Phys. 61, 865–867.Google Scholar
Ruetsch, G. R. & Maxey, M. R. 1991 Small scale features of vorticity and passive scalar fields in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids A 3, 1587–1597.Google Scholar
Santangelo, P., Benzi, R. & Legras, B. 1989 The generation of vortices in high-resolution, two-dimensional decaying turbulence and the influence of initial conditions on the breaking of similarity. Phys. Fluids A 1, 1027–1034.Google Scholar
She, Z.-S. 1991 Intermittency and non-Gaussian statistics in turbulence. Fluid Dyn. Res. 8, 143–159.Google Scholar
She, Z.-S., Jackson, E. & Orszag, S. A. 1990 Structure and dynamics of homogeneous turbulence, models and simulations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 434, 101–124.Google Scholar
Siggia, E. D. 1981 Numerical study of small scale intermittency in three dimensional turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 107, 375–406.Google Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1951 On the fine scale structure of turbulence. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 208, 534–542.Google Scholar
Van Atta, C. W., & Antonia, R. A. 1980 Reynolds number dependence of skewness and flatness factors of turbulent velocity derivatives. Phys. Fluids 23, 252–257.Google Scholar
Vincent, A. & Meneguzzi, M. 1991 The spatial structure and statistical properties of homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 225, 1–25.Google Scholar