Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:54:34.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

To Pay or Be Paid? The Impact of Taker Fees and Order Flow Inducements on Trading Costs in U.S. Options Markets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2016

Robert Battalio ,
Andriy Shkilko  and
Robert Van Ness
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Consistent with prior literature, we find that average relative effective spreads are higher for venues that pay for order flow (PFOF) than for venues utilizing the maker-taker (MT) model. This relation becomes more nuanced when liquidity fees are incorporated into liquidity cost measures. For the majority of options, PFOF venues offer lower average liquidity costs net of taker fees. Net liquidity costs for the high-priced options, however, are lower for MT venues. Overall, our results suggest that the inclusion of fees and rebates can rationalize the routing of most, but not all, marketable orders to PFOF venues.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 51 , Issue 5 , October 2016 , pp. 1637 - 1662
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anand, A.; Hua, J.; and McCormick, T.. “Make-Take Structure and Market Quality: Evidence from the U.S. Options Markets.” Management Science, 62 (2016), 3271–3290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angel, J.; Harris, L.; and Spatt, C.. “Equity Trading in the 21st Century.” Quarterly Journal of Finance, 1 (2011), 1–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barclay, M.; Hendershott, T.; and McCormick, D. T.. “Competition among Trading Venues: Information and Trading on Electronic Trading Networks.” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 2637–2666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battalio, R.“Third Market Broker-Dealers: Cost Competitors or Cream Skimmers?” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 341–352.Google Scholar
Battalio, R.; Corwin, S.; and Jennings, R.. “Can Brokers Have It All? On the Relation between Make-Take Fees and Limit Order Execution Quality.” Journal of Finance, 71 (2016), 2193–2238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battalio, R.; Greene, J.; and Jennings, R.. “Do Competing Specialists and Preferencing Dealers Affect Market Quality?” Review of Financial Studies, 10 (1997), 969–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battalio, R.; Greene, J.; and Jennings, R.. “Order Flow Distribution, Bid–Ask Spreads, and Liquidity Costs: Merrill Lynch’s Decision to Cease Routinely Routing Orders to Regional Stock Exchanges.” Journal of Financial Intermediation, 7 (1998), 338–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battalio, R.; Hatch, B.; and Jennings, R.. “Toward a National Market System for U.S. Exchange-Listed Equity Options.” Journal of Finance, 59 (2004), 933–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battalio, R., and Holden, C.. “A Simple Model of Payment for Order Flow, Internalization, and Total Trading Cost.” Journal of Financial Markets, 4 (2001), 33–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battalio, R.; Jennings, R.; and Selway, J.. “The Relationship among Market-Making Revenue, Payment for Order Flow, and Trading Costs for Market Orders.” Journal of Financial Services Research, 19 (2001), 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battalio, R., and Schultz, P.. “Regulatory Uncertainty and Market Liquidity: The 2008 Short Sale Ban’s Impact on Equity Option Markets.” Journal of Finance, 66 (2011), 2013–2053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessembinder, H.“Selection Biases and Cross-Market Trading Cost Comparisons.” Working Paper, University of Utah (2003).Google Scholar
Bessembinder, H., and Kaufman, H.. “A Cross-Exchange Comparison of Execution Costs and Information Flow for NYSE-Listed Stocks.” Journal of Financial Economics, 46 (1997), 293–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehmer, E.“Dimensions of Execution Quality: Recent Evidence for US Equity Markets.” Journal of Financial Economics, 78 (2005), 553–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakravarty, S.; Jain, P.; Upson, J.; and Wood, R.. “Clean Sweep: Informed Trading through Intermarket Sweep Orders.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 47 (2012), 415–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colliard, J., and Foucault, T.. “Trading Fees and Efficiency in Limit Order Markets.” Review of Financial Studies, 25 (2012), 3389–3421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidoff, S.“S.E.C.’s Review of Stock Trading Will See Some of Its Own Work.” New York Times DealBook, available at http://goo.gl/V0LtJa (Feb. 11, 2014).Google Scholar
De Fontnouvelle, P.; Fishe, R.; and Harris, J.. “The Behavior of Bid–Ask Spreads and Volume in Options Markets during the Competition for Listings in 1999.” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 2437–2464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easley, D.; Kiefer, N.; and O’Hara, M.. “Cream-Skimming or Profit-Sharing? The Curious Role of Purchased Order Flow.” Journal of Finance, 51 (1996), 811–833.Google Scholar
Easley, D., and O’Hara, M.. “Price, Trade Size, and Information in Securities Markets.” Journal of Financial Economics, 19 (1987), 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, M.; Shkilko, A.; Van Ness, B.; and Van Ness, R.. “Competition in the Market for NASDAQ Securities.” Journal of Financial Markets, 11 (2008), 113–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, L.“Minimum Price Variations, Discrete Bid–Ask Spreads, and Quotation Sizes.” Review of Financial Studies, 7 (1994), 148–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, J.“Does Option Trading Convey Stock Price Information?” Journal of Financial Economics, 111 (2014), 625–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson, M., and Wilhelm, W.. “Market Making in the Options Markets and the Costs of Discrete Hedge Rebalancing.” Journal of Finance, 47 (1992), 765–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C.“Market Integration and Price Execution for NYSE-Listed Securities.” Journal of Finance, 48 (1993), 1009–1038.Google Scholar
Malinova, K., and Park, A.. “Subsidizing Liquidity: The Impact of Make/Take Fees on Market Quality.” Journal of Finance, 70 (2015), 509–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, M., and Fialkowski, D.. “Posted versus Effective Spreads: Good Prices or Bad Quotes?” Journal of Financial Economics, 35 (1994), 269–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar