Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T20:01:33.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Synthesis of Two Factor Estimation Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2015

Gregory Connor ,
Robert A. Korajczyk  and
Robert T. Uhlaner
Gregory Connor
Affiliation:
[email protected], Department of Economics, Finance and Accounting, National University of Ireland, Maynooth County Kildare, Ireland
Robert A. Korajczyk*
Affiliation:
[email protected], Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
Robert T. Uhlaner
Affiliation:
[email protected], McKinsey & Co., San Francisco, CA 94104, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two-pass cross-sectional regression (TPCSR) is frequently used in estimating factor risk premia. Recent papers argue that the common practice of grouping assets into portfolios to reduce the errors-in-variables (EIV) problem leads to loss of efficiency and masks potential deviations from asset pricing models. One solution that allows the use of individual assets while overcoming the EIV problem is iterated TPCSR (ITPCSR). ITPCSR converges to a fixed point regardless of the initial factors chosen. ITPCSR is intimately linked to the asymptotic principal components (APC) method of estimating factors since the ITPCSR estimates are the APC estimates, up to a rotation.

Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , August 2015 , pp. 825 - 842
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ang, A.; Liu, J.; and Schwarz, K.. “Using Stocks or Portfolios in Tests of Factor Models.” Working Paper, Columbia University (2010).Google Scholar
Black, F.; Jensen, M. C.; and Scholes, M.. “The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some Empirical Tests.” In Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets, Jensen, M. C., ed. New York, NY: Praeger (1972).Google Scholar
Brown, S. J., and Weinstein, M. I.. “A New Approach to Testing Asset Pricing Models: The Bilinear Paradigm.” Journal of Finance, 38 (1983), 711–743.Google Scholar
Chen, N.; Roll, R.; and Ross, S.. “Economic Forces and the Stock Market.” Journal of Business, 59 (1986), 383–404.Google Scholar
Connor, G. “A Unified Beta Pricing Theory.” Journal of Economic Theory, 34 (1984), 13–31.Google Scholar
Connor, G.; Goldberg, L. R.; and Korajczyk, R. A.. Portfolio Risk Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (2010).Google Scholar
Connor, G., and Korajczyk, R. A.. “Performance Measurement with the Arbitrage Pricing Theory: A New Framework for Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics, 15 (1986), 323–346.Google Scholar
Connor, G., and Korajczyk, R. A.. “Estimating Pervasive Economic Factors with Missing Observations.” Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1268954 (1987).Google Scholar
Connor, G., and Korajczyk, R. A.. “Risk and Return in an Equilibrium APT: Application of a New Test Methodology.” Journal of Financial Economics, 21 (1988), 255–290.Google Scholar
Connor, G., and Korajczyk, R. A.. “The Attributes, Behavior, and Performance of U.S. Mutual Funds.” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 1 (1991), 5–26.Google Scholar
Connor, G., and Korajczyk, R. A.. “A Test for the Number of Factors in an Approximate Factor Model.” Journal of Finance, 48 (1993), 1263–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempster, A. P.; Laird, N. M.; Rubin, D. B.; “Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39 (1977), 1–38.Google Scholar
Fama, E. F. Foundations of Finance. New York, NY: Basic Books (1976).Google Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns,” Journal of Finance, 47 (1992), 427–465.Google Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds.” Journal of Financial Economics, 33 (1993), 5–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F., and MacBeth, J. D.. “Risk, Return and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests.” Journal of Political Economy, 71 (1973), 607–636.Google Scholar
Jagannathan, R.; Skoulakis, G.; and Wang, Z.. “The Analysis of the Cross-Section of Security Returns.” In Handbook of Financial Econometrics, Ait-Sahalia, Y. and Hansen, L. P., eds. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier (2010).Google Scholar
Jagannathan, R., and Wang, Z.. “An Asymptotic Theory for Estimating Beta-Pricing Models Using Cross-Sectional Regression.” Journal of Finance, 53 (1998), 1285–1309.Google Scholar
Jagannathan, R., and Wang, Y.. “Lazy Investors, Discretionary Consumption, and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, 62 (2007), 1623–1661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. S. “Extracting Factors from Heteroskedastic Asset Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, 62 (2001), 293–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kan, R., and Zhang, C.. “Two-Pass Tests of Asset Pricing Models with Useless Factors.” Journal of Finance, 64 (1999), 203–235.Google Scholar
Kleibergen, F. “Tests of Risk Premia in Linear Factor Models.” Journal of Econometrics, 149 (2009), 149–173.Google Scholar
Kruskal, J. B. “Factor Analysis and Principal Components: Bilinear Methods.” In International Encyclopedia of Statistics, Vol. 1, Kruskal, W. H. and Tanur, J. M., eds. New York, NY: The Free Press (1978), 307–330.Google Scholar
Lehmann, B. N., and Modest, D. M.. “The Empirical Foundations of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory.” Journal of Financial Economics, 21 (1988), 213–254.Google Scholar
Lettau, M., and Ludvigson, S.. “Resurrecting the (C)CAPM: A Cross-Sectional Test When Risk Premia Are Time-Varying.” Journal of Political Economy, 109 (2001), 1238–1287.Google Scholar
Lewellen, J.; Nagel, S.; and Shanken, J.. “A Skeptical Appraisal of Asset Pricing Tests.” Journal of Financial Economics, 96 (2010), 175–194.Google Scholar
Lintner, J. “Security Prices, Risk, and Maximal Gains from Diversification.” Journal of Finance, 20 (1965), 587–615.Google Scholar
Miller, M. H., and Scholes, M.. “Rates of Return in Relation to Risk: A Re-Examination of Some Recent Findings.” In Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets, Jensen, M., ed. New York, NY: Praeger (1972).Google Scholar
Morningstar. Ibbotson SBBI: 2010 Classic Yearbook. Chicago, IL: Morningstar (2010).Google Scholar
Roll, R., and Ross, S. A.. “An Empirical Investigation of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory.” Journal of Finance, 35 (1980), 1073–1103.Google Scholar
Searle, S. R. Matrix Algebra Useful for Statistics. New York, NY: Wiley (1982).Google Scholar
Shanken, J. “An Asymptotic Analysis of the Traditional Risk-Return Model: Appendices.” Working Paper, University of California, Berkeley (1982).Google Scholar
Shanken, J. “An Asymptotic Analysis of the Traditional Risk-Return Model.” Working Paper, University of California, Berkeley (1983).Google Scholar
Shanken, J. “On the Estimation of Beta-Pricing Models.” Review of Financial Studies, 5 (1992), 1–33.Google Scholar
Skoulakis, G. “Panel Data Inference in Finance: Least-Squares vs. Fama-MacBeth.” Working Paper, University of Maryland (2008).Google Scholar
Stock, J. H., and Watson, M. W.. “Diffusion Indices.” Working Paper, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=226366 (1998).Google Scholar
Yuan, J., and Savickas, R.. “To Intercept or Not To Intercept, That Is the Question in Cross-Sectional Asset Pricing Tests.” Working Paper, George Washington University (2009).Google Scholar