Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:20:40.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SOX Section 404 and Corporate Innovation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2018

Huasheng Gao Open the ORCID record for Huasheng Gao [Opens in a new window]  and
Jin Zhang Open the ORCID record for Jin Zhang [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper exploits a quasi-natural experiment to investigate the relation between the Sarbanes–Oxley Act (SOX) of 2002 and corporate innovation: firms with a public float under $75 million can delay compliance with Section 404 of the act. We find a significant decrease in the number of patents and patent citations for firms that are subject to Section 404 compliance relative to firms that are not. This relation is more pronounced when firms are financially constrained and when firms face high litigation risk. Overall, our evidence suggests that SOX imparts real costs to the economy by decreasing corporate innovativeness.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , April 2019 , pp. 759 - 787
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

We are grateful for the helpful comments from Martin Bugeja, Iftekhar Hasan, Kose John, Kenneth Lehn (the referee), Paul Malatesta (the editor), Tianshu Qu, Rui Shen, Shuo Wu, Julia Yu, Yachang Zeng, and seminar participants from Nanyang Technological University and the 2016 Paris Financial Management Conference. All errors are our own.

References

Aboody, D., and Lev, B.. “Information Asymmetry, R&D, and Insider Gains.” Journal of Finance, 55 (2000), 2747–2766.Google Scholar
Acharya, V.; Baghai, R. P.; and Subramanian, K. V.. “Wrongful Discharge Laws and Innovation.” Review of Financial Studies, 27 (2014), 301–346.Google Scholar
Acharya, V., and Xu, Z.. “Financial Dependence and Innovation: The Case of Public versus Private Firms.” Journal of Financial Economics, 124 (2017), 223–243.Google Scholar
Aghion, P.; Bloom, N.; Blundell, R.; Griffith, R.; and Howitt, P.. “Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120 (2005), 701–728.Google Scholar
Aghion, P.; Van Reenen, J.; and Zingales, L.. “Innovation and Institutional Ownership.” American Economic Review, 103 (2013), 277–304.Google Scholar
Ahmed, A. S.; McAnally, M. L.; Rasmussen, S.; and Weaver, C. D.. “How Costly Is the Sarbanes–Oxley Act? Evidence on the Effects of the Act on Corporate Profitability.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 16 (2010), 352–369.Google Scholar
Ashbaugh-Skaife, H.; Collins, D. W.; and Kinney, W. R. Jr. “The Discovery and Reporting of Internal Control Deficiencies Prior to SOX-Mandated Audits.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44 (2007), 166–192.Google Scholar
Ashbaugh-Skaife, H.; Collins, D. W.; Kinney, W. R. Jr.; and Lafond, R.. “The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies on Firm Risk and Cost of Equity.” Journal of Accounting Research, 47 (2009), 1–43.Google Scholar
Atanassov, J.“Do Hostile Takeovers Stifle Innovation? Evidence from Antitakeover Legislation and Corporate Patenting.” Journal of Finance, 68 (2013), 1097–1131.Google Scholar
Bargeron, L. L.; Lehn, K. M.; and Zutter, C. J.. “Sarbanes–Oxley and Corporate Risk-Taking.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49 (2010), 34–52.Google Scholar
Brown, J. R.; Fazzari, S. M.; and Petersen, B. C.. “Financing Innovation and Growth: Cash Flow, External Equity, and the 1990s R&D Boom.” Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 151–185.Google Scholar
Carney, W. J.“The Costs of Being Public after Sarbanes–Oxley: The Irony of ‘Going Private’.” Emory Law Journal, 55 (2006), 141–160.Google Scholar
Chang, X.; Fu, K.; Low, A.; and Zhang, W.. “Non-Executive Employee Stock Options and Corporate Innovation.” Journal of Financial Economics, 115 (2015), 168–188.Google Scholar
Chemmanur, T., and Tian, X.. “Do Antitakeover Provisions Spur Corporate Innovation? A Regression Discontinuity Analysis.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 53 (2018), 1163–1194.Google Scholar
Claessens, S., and Laeven, L.. “Financial Development, Property Rights, and Growth.” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 2401–2436.Google Scholar
Coates, J. C. IV. “The Goals and Promise of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21 (2007), 91–116.Google Scholar
Fang, V. W.; Tian, X.; and Tice, S.. “Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation?” Journal of Finance, 69 (2014), 2085–2125.Google Scholar
Feng, M.; Li, C.; McVay, S. E.; and Skaife, H.. “Does Ineffective Internal Control over Financial Reporting Affect a Firm’s Operations? Evidence from Firms’ Inventory Management.” Accounting Review, 90 (2015), 529–577.Google Scholar
Glass, Lewis & Co. Control Deficiencies Trend Alert. San Francisco, CA: Glass, Lewis & Co., LLC(2005).Google Scholar
Griliches, Z.“Market Value, R&D, and Patents.” Economics Letters, 7 (1981), 183–187.Google Scholar
Hadlock, C. J., and Pierce, J. R.. “New Evidence on Measuring Financial Constraints: Moving Beyond the KZ Index.” Review of Financial Studies, 23 (2010), 1909–1940.Google Scholar
Hall, B. H.; Griliches, Z.; and Hausman, J. A.. “Patents and R and D: Is There a Lag?” International Economic Review, 27 (1986), 265–283.Google Scholar
Hall, B. H.; Jaffe, A. B.; and Trajtenberg, M.. “The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools.” In Patents, Citations and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy, Jaffe, A. B. and Trajtenberg, M., eds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (2005), 403–470.Google Scholar
Hausman, J.; Hall, B. H.; and Griliches, Z.. “Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship.” Econometrica, 52 (1984), 909–938.Google Scholar
He, J., and Tian, X.. “The Dark Side of Analyst Coverage: The Case of Innovation.” Journal of Financial Economics, 109 (2013), 856–878.Google Scholar
Hermanson, D. R., and Ye, Z.. “Why Do Some Accelerated Filers with SOX Section 404 Material Weaknesses Provide Early Warning under Section 302?” AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28 (2009), 247–271.Google Scholar
Holmstrom, B., and Kaplan, S. N.. “The State of U.S. Corporate Governance: What’s Right and What’s Wrong?” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 15 (2003), 8–20.Google Scholar
Hong, H., and Kacperczyk, M.. “Competition and Bias.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125 (2010), 1683–1725.Google Scholar
Horwitz, B. N., and Kolodny, R.. “The Economic Effects of Involuntary Uniformity in the Financial Reporting of R&D Expenditures.” Journal of Accounting Research, 18 (1980), 38–74.Google Scholar
Hsu, P.-H.; Tian, X.; and Xu, Y.. “Financial Development and Innovation: Cross-Country Evidence.” Journal of Financial Economics, 112 (2014), 116–135.Google Scholar
Iliev, P.“The Effect of SOX Section 404: Costs, Earnings Quality, and Stock Prices.” Journal of Finance, 65 (2010), 1163–1196.Google Scholar
Indjejikian, R., and Matějka, M.. “CFO Fiduciary Responsibilities and Annual Bonus Incentives.” Journal of Accounting Research, 47 (2009), 1061–1093.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. F.; Kasznik, R.; and Nelson, K. K.. “The Impact of Securities Litigation Reform on the Disclosure of Forward-Looking Information by High Technology Firms.” Journal of Accounting Research, 39 (2001), 297–327.Google Scholar
Jones, C., and Weingram, S.. “Why 10b-5 Litigation Risk Is Higher for Technology and Financial Services Firms.” Working Paper, George Washington University (1996).Google Scholar
Kang, Q.; Liu, Q.; and Qi, R.. “The Sarbanes–Oxley Act and Corporate Investment: A Structural Assessment.” Journal of Financial Economics, 96 (2010), 291–305.Google Scholar
Kogan, L.; Papanikolaou, D.; Seru, A.; and Stoffman, N.. “Technological Innovation, Resource Allocation, and Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132 (2017), 665–712.Google Scholar
Koh, P.-S., and Reeb, D. M.. “Missing R&D.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60 (2015), 73–94.Google Scholar
Koh, P.-S.; Reeb, D. M.; and Zhao, W.. “CEO Confidence and Unreported R&D.” Management Science, 64 (2018), 5461–5959.Google Scholar
Kothari, S. P.; Laguerre, T. E.; and Leone, A. J.. “Capitalization versus Expensing: Evidence on the Uncertainty of Future Earnings from Capital Expenditures versus R&D Outlays.” Review of Accounting Studies, 7 (2002), 355–382.Google Scholar
Krishnan, J.; Rama, D.; and Zhang, Y.. “Costs to Comply with SOX Section 404.” AUDITING: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 27 (2008), 169–186.Google Scholar
Lerner, J., and Wulf, J.. “Innovation and Incentives: Evidence from Corporate R&D.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 89 (2007), 634–644.Google Scholar
Leuz, C.; Triantis, A.; and Wang, T. Y.. “Why Do Firms Go Dark? Causes and Economic Consequences of Voluntary SEC Deregistrations.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45 (2008), 181–208.Google Scholar
Manso, G.“Motivating Innovation.” Journal of Finance, 66 (2011), 1823–1860.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E.“Clusters and the New Economics of Competition.” Harvard Business Review, 76 (1998), 77–90.Google Scholar
Raddatz, C.“Liquidity Needs and Vulnerability to Financial Underdevelopment.” Journal of Financial Economics, 80 (2006), 677–722.Google Scholar
Ribstein, L. E.“Market vs. Regulatory Responses to Corporate Fraud: A Critique of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002.” Journal of Corporation Law, 28 (2002), 1–68.Google Scholar
Rice, S. C.; Weber, D. P.; and Wu, B.. “Does SOX 404 Have Teeth? Consequences of the Failure to Report Existing Internal Control Weaknesses.” Accounting Review, 90 (2015), 1169–1200.Google Scholar
Romer, P. M.“Endogenous Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economy, 98 (1990), S71–S102.Google Scholar
Scherer, F. M.“Firm Size, Market Structure, Opportunity, and the Output of Patented Inventions.” American Economic Review, 55 (1965), 1097–1125.Google Scholar
Solomon, D., and Bryan-Low, C.. “Companies Complain About Cost of Corporate-Governance Rules.” Wall Street Journal (Feb. 10, 2004).Google Scholar
Solow, R. M.“Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 39 (1957), 312–320.Google Scholar
Stuart, A.“Sticker Shock.” CFO Magazine (Sept. 1, 2003).Google Scholar
Wallison, P.“Blame Sarbanes–Oxley.” Wall Street Journal (Sept. 3, 2003).Google Scholar
Whited, T. M., and Wu, G.. “Financial Constraints Risk.” Review of Financial Studies, 19 (2006), 531–559.Google Scholar
Zhang, I. X.“Economic Consequences of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44 (2007), 74–115.Google Scholar