Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:44:13.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Second-Order Stochastic Dominance, Reward-Risk Portfolio Selection, and the CAPM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Enrico De Giorgi  and
Thierry Post
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Starting from the reward-risk model for portfolio selection introduced in De Giorgi (2005), we derive the reward-risk Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) analogously to the classical mean-variance CAPM. In contrast to the mean-variance model, reward-risk portfolio selection arises from an axiomatic definition of reward and risk measures based on a few basic principles, including consistency with second-order stochastic dominance. With complete markets, we show that at any financial market equilibrium, reward-risk investors' optimal allocations are comonotonic and, therefore, our model reduces to a representative investor model. Moreover, the pricing kernel is an explicitly given, non-increasing function of the market portfolio return, reflecting the representative investor's risk attitude. Finally, an empirical application shows that the reward-risk CAPM captures the cross section of U.S. stock returns better than the mean-variance CAPM does.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 525 - 546
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acerbi, C., and Tasche, D.. “On the Coherence of Expected Shortfall.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 26 (2002), 1487–1503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Artzner, P.; Delbaen, F.; Eber, J.-M.; and Heath, D.. “Thinking Coherently.” Risk, 10 (1997), 68–71.Google Scholar
Artzner, P.; Delbaen, F.; Eber, J.-M.; and Heath, D.. “Coherent Measure of Risk.” Mathematical Finance, 9 (1999), 203–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassett, G.; Koenker, R.; and Kordas, G.. “Pessimistic Portfolio Allocation and Choquet Expected Utility.” Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2 (2004), 477–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bawa, V. “Optimal Rules for Ordering Uncertain Prospects.” Journal of Financial Economics, 2 (1975), 95–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bawa, V., and Lindenberg, E.. “Capital Market Equilibrium in a Mean-Lower Partial Moment Framework.” Journal of Financial Economics, 5 (1977), 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, F.; Jensen, M.; and Scholes, M.. “The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some Empirical Tests.” In Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets, Jensen, M., ed. New York: Praeger Publishers (1972).Google Scholar
Carlier, G., and Dana, R.. “Core of Convex Distortions of a Probability on a Non Atomic Space.” Journal of Economic Theory, 113 (2003), 199–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Giorgi, E. “Reward-Risk Portfolio Selection and Stochastic Dominance.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 29 (2005), 895–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffie, D.Security Markets: Stochastic Models. New York, NY: Academic Press (1998).Google Scholar
Ellsberg, D. “Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75 (1961), 643–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E., and French, K.. “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, 47 (1992), 427–465.Google Scholar
Fama, E., and MacBeth, J.. “Risk, Return and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests.” Journal of Political Economy, 81 (1973), 607–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, I., and Blume, M.. “A New Look at the Capital Asset Pricing Model.” Journal of Finance, 28 (1973), 283–299.Google Scholar
Gibbons, M.; Ross, S. A.; and Shanken, J.. “A Test of the Efficiency of a Given Portfolio.” Econometrica, 57 (1989), 1121–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlow, W., and Rao, R.. “Asset Pricing in a Generalized Mean-Lower Partial Moment Framework: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 25 (1989), 285–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, W., and Warren, J.. “Toward the Development of an Equilibrium Capital-Market Model Based on Semivariance.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 9 (1974), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.-F., and Litzenberger, R.. Foundations for Financial Economics. New York, NY: North Holland (1988).Google Scholar
Jagannathan, R., and Wang, Z.. “The Conditional CAPM and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns.” Journal of Finance, 51 (1996), 3–53.Google Scholar
Jean, W. “Comparison of Moments and Stochastic Dominance Ranking Methods.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 10 (1975), 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorion, P.Value at Risk. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin (1997).Google Scholar
Kuosmanen, T. “Efficient Diversification According to Stochastic Dominance Criteria.” Management Science, 50 (2004), 1390–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lettau, M., and Ludvigson, X.. “Resurrecting the (C)CAPM: A Cross-Sectional Test When Risk Premia Are Time-Varying.” Journal of Political Economy, 109 (2001), 1238–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, H.Stochastic Dominance. Boston-Dordrecht-London: Kluwer Academic (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lintner, J. “The Valuation of Risky Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 47 (1965), 13–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magill, M., and Quinzii, M.. Theory of Incomplete Markets, Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (1996).Google Scholar
Markowitz, H. “Portfolio Selection.” Journal of Finance, 7 (1952), 77–91.Google Scholar
Markowitz, H.Portfolio Selection. New York, NY: John Wiley Sons (1959).Google Scholar
Mossin, J. “Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market.” Econometrica, 34 (1966), 768–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogryczak, W., and Ruszczynski, A.. “From Stochastic Dominance to Mean-Risk Models: Semideviations as Risk Measures.” European Journal of Operation Research, 116 (1999), 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, T. “Empirical Tests for Stochastic Dominance Efficiency.” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 1905–1932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, T., and van Vliet, P.. “Empirical Tests of the Mean-semivariance CAPM.” Working Paper, Erasmus University, Rotterdam (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, K.; Price, B.; and Nantell, J.. “Variance and Lower Partial MomentMeasures of Systematic Risk: Some Analytical and Empirical Results.” Journal of Finance, 37 (1982), 843–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinganum, M. “A New Empirical Perspective on the CAPM.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 16 (1981), 439–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockafellar, R., and Uryasev, S.. “Conditional Value-at-Risk for General Loss Distributions.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 26 (2002), 1443–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmeidler, D. “Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity.” Econometrica, 57 (1989), 571–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, W. “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk.” Journal of Finance, 19 (1964), 425–442.Google Scholar
Tobin, J. “Liquidity Preference as Behaviour Towards Risk.” Review of Economic Studies, 25 (1958), 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unser, M. “Lower Partial Moments as Measures of Perceived Risk: An Experimental Study.” Journal of Economic Psychology, 21 (2000), 253–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O.. The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (1944).Google Scholar