Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:43:14.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Ranking of Doctoral Programs by Financial Research Contributions of Graduates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Robert C. Klemkosky  and
Donald L. Tuttle
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Published scholarly research is asserted to be a major criteria used to judge or assess the quality of a university's faculty. This assertion has been supported in many of the academic disciplines by comparing peer ratings of graduate programs and the research productivity of the faculty of those programs. In the economics area, John J. Siegfried [ 7] found a significant relationship between peer ratings of economics departments, using the ratings of the first American Council on Education study by Cartter, and the number of available pages contributed by the department to the leading economic academic journals. A recent study by Klemkosky and Tuttle [6] found the same relationship between an academic institution's published research productivity and the quality of the institution's graduate finance programs as rated by peers, using the survey results of Brooker and Shinoda [3] to determine peer ratings. The importance of published research in turn is recognized by many academic institutions since the relative quality and quantity of published research is one of the major criteria used in making faculty promotion and tenure decisions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 1977 , pp. 491 - 497
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]American Assembly of Collegiate Schools of Business. Faculty Personnel of Member Schools, 11th ed.St. Louis, Missouri (1975).Google Scholar
[2]American Economic Association. Directory of Members of the AEA, edited by Fels, Rendigs. Nashville, Tennessee (October 1974).Google Scholar
[3]Brooker, George, and Shinoda, Phillip. “Peer Ratings of Graduate Programs for Business.” Journal of Business, Vol. 49 (April 1976), pp. 240–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Comprehensive Dissertation Index: 1861–1972, Vols. 33–37. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Xerox University Microfilm (1973).Google Scholar
[5]Dissertation Abstracts International, Vols. 34–36. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Xerox University Microfilm (1973–1975).Google Scholar
[6]Klemkosky, Robert C., and Tuttle, Donald L.. “The Institutional Source and Concentration of Financial Research.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 32 (June 1977), pp. 901–907.Google Scholar
[7]Siegfried, John J. “The Publishing of Economic Papers and Its Impact on Graduate Faculty Ratings.” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 10 (March 1972), pp. 31–49.Google Scholar