Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:34:40.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Pricing of Options on Default-Free Bonds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Extract

Recent developments in the finance literature dealing with the valuation of contingent claims have been triggered by Black and Scholes [2] with their valuation of European options on corporate stocks. The type of valuation model derived by Black and Scholes is attractive because it is independent of preferences. This independence is possible due to the fact that the contingent claims are usually assumed to be contingent on traded assets or traded state variables. For example, a European call option is a claim contingent on the value of the corresponding stock. To maintain the independence of the claim from preferences, however, some variables have to be discarded and considered as constants. For example, the rate of interest, which is not a traded state variable, is considered a constant in most of the literature (see Black and Scholes [2], Merton [11], and Ingersoll [9]). Though this approximation might not cause important discrepancies in the case of corporate liabilities and options on corporate liabilities, the effect of such an approximation on the value of default-free bonds and options on default-free bonds is more important since these liabilities depend only on the rate of interest.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Arnold, L.Stochastic Differential Equations, Theory and Applications. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (1974).Google Scholar
[2]Black, F., and Scholes, M.. “The Pricing of Options on Corporate Liabilities.” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Brennan, M., and Schwartz, E.. “Savings Bonds, Retractable Bonds and Callable Bonds.” Journal of Financial Economics (08 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Brennan, M., and Schwartz, E.. “Analyzing Convertible Bonds.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (11 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Carnahan, B.; Luther, H.; and Wilkes, J.. Applied Numerical Methods. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (1969).Google Scholar
[6]Cox, J.; Ingersoll, J.; and Ross, S.. “A Theory of the Term Structure of Interest Rates.” Research paper no. 468, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University (08 1978).Google Scholar
[7]Dothan, U.On the Term Structure of Interest Rates.” Journal of Financial Economics (01 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Gihman, I., and Skorohod, A.. Stochastic Differential Equations. Springer Verlag (1972).Google Scholar
[9]Ingersoll, J. E.A Contingent Claims Valuation of Convertible Securities.” Journal of Financial Economics (05 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Merton, R. C.Optimum Consumption and Portfolio Rules in a Continuous Time Model.” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 3 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Merton, R. C.. “On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 29 (1974).Google Scholar
[12]Peaceman, D. W., and Rachford, H. H.. “The Numerical Solution of Parabolic and Elliptic Differential Equations.” Journal Soc. Indust. Appl. Math., Vol. 3 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Rendleman, R. J. Jr, and Bartter, B. J.. “The Pricing of Options on Debt Securities.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (03 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Schwartz, E.The Valuation of Warrants: Implementing a New Approach.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 4 (1977).Google Scholar
[15]Smith, G. D.Numerical Solutions of Partial Differential Equations. Oxford University Press (1978).Google Scholar
[16]Vasicek, D.An Equilibrium Characterization of the Term Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics (11 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar