Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:50:54.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Predictive Regressions: A Reduced-Bias Estimation Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Yakov Amihud  and
Clifford M. Hurvich
Yakov Amihud
Affiliation:
[email protected], Department of Finance, and Hurvich
Clifford M. Hurvich
Affiliation:
churvich@stern. nyu.edu, Department of Operations and Management Science, New York University, Stern School of Business, 44 W 4th St, New York, NY 10012
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Standard predictive regressions produce biased coefficient estimates in small samples when the regressors are Gaussian first-order autoregressive with errors that are correlated with the error series of the dependent variable. See Stambaugh (1999) for the single regressor model. This paper proposes a direct and convenient method to obtain reduced-bias estimators for single and multiple regressor models by employing an augmented regression, adding a proxy for the errors in the autoregressive model. We derive bias expressions for both the ordinary least-squares and our reduced-bias estimated coefficients. For the standard errors of the estimated predictive coefficients, we develop a heuristic estimator that performs well in simulations, for both the single predictor model and an important specification of the multiple predictor model. The effectiveness of our method is demonstrated by simulations and empirical estimates of common predictive models in finance. Our empirical results show that some of the predictive variables that were significant under ordinary least squares become insignificant under our estimation procedure.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , December 2004 , pp. 813 - 841
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amihud, Y. ’Illiquidity and Stock Returns: Cross-Sectional and Time-Series Effects.” Journal of Financial Economics, 5 (2002), 31–56.Google Scholar
Baker, M., and Stein, J. C.. “Market Liquidity as a Sentiment Indicator.” Working Paper, Harvard Business School (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. Y., and Shiller, R. J.. “The Dividend-Price Ratio and Expectations of Future Dividends and Discount Factors.” Review of Financial Studies, 1 (1988), 195–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlhaus, R. “Small Sample Effects in Time Series Analysis: A New Asymptotic Theory and a New Estimate.” Annals of Statistics, 16 (1988), 808–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F. “Stock Returns, Expected Returns, and Real Activity.” Journal of Finance, 45 (1990), 1089–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “Dividend Yields and Expected Stock Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, 22 (1988), 3–25.Google Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “Business Conditions and Expected Returns on Stocks and Bonds.” Journal of Financial Economics, 25 (1989), 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferson, W. E.; Sarkissian, S.; and Simin, T. T.. “Spurious Regressions in Financial Economics?” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 1393–1413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, K. R.; Schwert, G.W.; and Stambaugh, R. F.. “Expected Stock Returns and Volatility.” Journal of Financial Economics, 19 (1987), 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, W. A.Introduction to Statistical Time Series. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons (1996).Google Scholar
Hodrick, R. “Dividend Yields and Expected Stock Returns: Alternative Procedures for Inference and Measurement.” Review of Financial Studies, 5 (1992), 357–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. M. “A Century of Stock Market Liquidity and Trading Costs.” Working Paper, Columbia Business School (2002).Google Scholar
Judge, G. G.; Hill, R. C.; Griffiths, W. E.; Lutkepohl, H.; and Lee, T.. Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons (1985).Google Scholar
Keim, D. B., and Stambaugh, R. F.. “Predicting Returns in the Stock and Bond Market.” Journal of Financial Economics, 17 (1986), 357–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, M. G. “Note on Bias in the Estimation of Autocorrelation.” Biometrika, 41 (1954), 403–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kothari, S. P., and Shanken, J.. “Book-to-Market, Dividend Yield, and Expected Market Returns: A Time-Series Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics, 18 (1997), 169–203.Google Scholar
Lewellen, J. “Predicting Returns with Financial Ratios.” Journal of Financial Economics (forthcoming 2004).Google Scholar
Mankiw, N. G., and Shapiro, M.. “Do We Reject Too Often? Small Sample Properties of Tests of Rational Expectations Models.” Economic Letters, 20 (1986), 139–145.Google Scholar
Nelson, C. R., and Kim, M. J.. “Predictable Stock Returns: The Role of Small Sample Bias.” Journal of Finance, 48 (1993), 641–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholls, D. F., and Pope, A. L.. “Bias in the Estimation of Multivariate Autoregressions.” Australian Journal of Statistics, 30A (1988), 296–309.Google Scholar
Pontiff, J., and Schall, L. D.. “Book-to-Market Ratios as Predictors of Market Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, 49 (1998), 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinsel, G. C.Elements of Multivariate Time Series Analysis. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawa, T. “The Exact Moments of the Least Squares Estimator for the Autoregressive Model.” Journal of Econometrics, 8 (1978), 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonoff, J. S. “The Relative Importance of Bias and Variability in the Estimation of the Variance of a Statistic.” The Statistician, 42 (1993), 3–7.Google Scholar
Stambaugh, R. F. “Bias in Regressions with Lagged Stochastic Regressors.” Working Paper, Univ. of Chicago (1986).Google Scholar
Stambaugh, R. F. “Predictive Regressions.” Journal of Financial Economics, 54 (1999), 375–421.Google Scholar