Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:38:15.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimal Financial Policy in Imperfect Markets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Extract

Most textbooks in finance are apparently embarrassed by the Modigliani-Miller (MM) theorem on capital structure. The intense controversy it has provoked in academic circles over the past sixteen years makes it hard to ignore, and yet many textbook writers seem to be unable to distill anything from it that might be of interest to their readers. A typical example might begin by laying out the economist's conventional perfect market assumptions and showing that the theorem may be derived deductively from these assumptions. It is then observed that markets are not perfect and it is implied that perfect market theorems, while perhaps interesting to ivory-tower academics, are of no use to a businessman who has to act in imperfect real-world markets. (For example, Weston and Brigham [16], in their appendix to Chapter 11, on p. 339 state: “Given their assumptions, their theoretical arguments were quite correct. However, their assumptions have been questioned extensively, and very few authorities today accept the MM position.”) We are then returned rather uneasily to the traditional world of U-shaped cost of capital curves, in which managers are required to examine such holy relics as financial break-even charts (Van Home [15, p. 231]) or to exercise judgment about the stockholders' utility preferences (Weston and Brigham [16, p. 258]) in order to make their debt/equity decision.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Arrow, K. J.Aspects of the Theory of Risk-Bearing. Yrjo Jahnsonnin Lectures, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
[2]Arrow, K. J.The Role of Securities in the Optimal Allocation of Risk Bearing.” Review of Economic Studies, April 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Baxter, N. T.Leverage, Risk of Ruin and the Cost of Capital.” Journal of Finance, October 1967.Google Scholar
[4]Debreu, G.The Theory of Value. New York, 1959.Google Scholar
[5]Diamond, P. A.The Role of a Stock Market in a General Equilibrium Model with Technological Uncertainty.” American Economic Review, September 1967.Google Scholar
[6]Durand, D.“Cost of Debt and Equity Funds for Business: Trends and Problems of Measurement.”Conference on Research on Mathematical Finance.N.B.E.R.,1952.Google Scholar
[7]Kraus, A., and Litzenberger, R.. “A State-Preference Model of Optimal Financial Leverage.” Journal of Finance, September 1973.Google Scholar
[8]Kuhn, H. W., and Tucker, A. W.. “Nonlinear Programming.” In Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, edited by Neyman, J.. Berkeley, 1951.Google Scholar
[9]Lintner, J.Security Prices, Risk, and Maximal Gains from Diversification.” Journal of Finance, December 1965.Google Scholar
[10]Miller, M. H., and Modigliani, F.. “Dividend Policy, Growth and the Valuation of Shares.” Journal of Business, October 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Modigliani, F., and Miller, M. H.. “The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance, and the Theory of Investment.” American Economic Review, June 1958.Google Scholar
[12]Modigliani, F.Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Correction.” American Economic Review, June 1963.Google Scholar
[13]Stiglitz, J. E.A Re-examination of the Modigliani-Miller Theorem.” American Economic Review, December 1969.Google Scholar
[14]Stiglitz, J. E.Theory of Finance.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Autumn 1972.Google Scholar
[15]Van Home, J. C.Financial Management and Policy, 2nd ed.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1971.Google Scholar
[16]Weston, J. F., and Brigham, E. F.. Managerial Finance, 4th ed.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1972.Google Scholar