Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T20:42:54.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A New Approach to Estimation of the Term Structure of Interest Rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2009

Donald R. Chambers ,
Willard T. Carleton  and
Donald W. Waldman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The purpose of this study is to extend the analysis of estimation of the term structure. The ability of the exponential/polynomial present-value function of equation (5) to approximate the theoretical present-value function is analyzed empirically. This study confirms previous results that indicate that the function does not provide an acceptable fit using least squares regression. In most samples, the near end of the estimated term structure appears substantially in error. Lengthening the polynomial tends to improve the fit only at the far end. Since the data appear to be subject to maturity-related heteroschedasticity, we have generalized the disturbance variance specification to allow for this possibility.

Our correction permits determination of sample-specific degrees of heteroschedasticity. The reason is that the intensity of the heteroschedasticity appears to change from period to period. Although previous studies have attempted heteroschedasticity corrections (see [4]), the same specification was imposed on each sample in such studies. Maximum likelihood estimation was proposed and implemented in this paper. The results indicate that the difficulties of providing a good fit using the exponential/polynomial function are substantially eliminated.

Recent literature regarding term structure estimation emphasizes the selection of more sophisticated estimating functions to provide a reasonable fit throughout the entire maturity range. This study emphasizes more careful modeling of the pricing disturbances. The prior approach involves somewhat complicated estimating functions and a potential loss of efficiency due to the lack of influence that each portion of the term structure is able to exert on other portions (with spline functions, for example.) Our maximum likelihood approach is somewhat difficult to implement and computationally burdensome. Nevertheless, it appears to provide a useful term structure estimation procedure.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , September 1984 , pp. 233 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Carleton, W. T., and Cooper, I. A.. “Estimation and Uses of the Term Structure of Interest Rates.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 31 (September 1976), pp. 1067–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Chambers, D. R. The Management of Default-Free Bond Portfolios. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (1981).Google Scholar
[3]Haley, C. W., and Schall, L. D.. The Theory of Financial Decisions. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company (1979).Google Scholar
[4]Jordan, J. V. Studies in Direct Estimation of the Term Structure. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, (1980).Google Scholar
[5]Jordan, J. V. “Discussion.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 38 (May 1982). pp. 354–356.Google Scholar
[6]Kmenta, J.Elements of Econometrics. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company (1971).Google Scholar
[7]McCulloch, J. H. “Measuring the Term Structure of Interest Rates.” Journal of Business, Vol. 44 (January 1971), pp. 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]McCulloch, J. H. “An Estimate of the Liquidity Premium.” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 83 (February 1975), pp. 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Phillips, G. M., and Taylor, P. J.. Theory and Applications of Numerical Analysis. London: Academic Press (1973).Google Scholar
[10]Schaefer, S. M.“On Measuring the Term Structure of Interest Rates.”Paper presented at the International Workshop on Recent Research in Capital Markets(September 1973).Google Scholar
[11]Schaefer, S. M. “Bond Prices and Taxation,” Unpublished paper (November 1977).Google Scholar
[12]Schaefer, S. M. “Measuring a Tax-Specific Term Structure of Interest Rates in the Market for British Government Securities.” Unpublished paper (August 1979).Google Scholar
[13]Schaefer, S. M. “Discussion: Conditional Predictions of Bond Prices and Returns,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 35 (May 1980), pp. 417–419.Google Scholar
[14]Theil, H.Principles of Econometrics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1971).Google Scholar
[15]Vasicek, O. A., and Fong, G.. “Term Structure Estimation Using Exponential Splines.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 38 (May 1982), pp. 339–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar