Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:38:09.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Merger-Driven Listing Dynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2023

B. Espen Eckbo*
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College Tuck School of Business and Norwegian School of Economics
Markus Lithell
Affiliation:
Norwegian School of Economics [email protected]
*
[email protected] (corresponding author)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Stock-market effectiveness in attracting and retaining firms under public ownership depends not only on stand-alone firms’ net listing benefits but also on gains from merging with a public acquirer. Using a novel merger-adjusted listing count, we show that the dramatic (≈50%) post-1996 U.S. listing decline—often attributed to declining listing benefits—is reversed as the “missing” firms de facto continue existing inside their public acquirers. Our merger adjustment also eliminates the U.S. listing gap, pointing instead to a distinct U.S. listing advantage: providing access to a well-functioning market for complex merger transactions.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington

Footnotes

We are grateful for the comments and suggestions of Sanjai Bhagat, Eric de Bodt, Ing-Haw Cheng, Jean-Gabriel Cousin, Joan Farre-Mensa (discussant), Jose Fillat (discussant), Kayla Freeman (discussant), Laurent Fresard, Andrey Golubov, Jarrad Harford (the editor), Peter Iliev (the referee), Tore Leite, Eva Liljeblom, Lubomir Litov (discussant), Tanakorn Makaew, Vojislav Maksimovic (discussant), Francesco Mazzola (discussant), Kasper Meisner Nielsen (discussant), Øyvind Norli, Jay Ritter, Ali Sanati, Felipe Severino, Keke Song (discussant), René Stulz (discussant), Karin Thorburn, Adam Winegar (discussant), Min Yang (discussant), and David Yin (discussant). We also thank the seminar participants at Humboldt University, Iowa State University, Norwegian School of Economics, Oslo Metropolitan University, Dartmouth College, Vienna University of Economics and Business, and conference participants at the 2020 Australasian Finance and Banking Conference, 2018 Bergen Entrepreneurship and Finance Conference, 2021 Boca Corporate Finance and Governance Conference, 2021 Economics Business and Organization Research Conference, 2021 European Financial Management Association Annual Meeting, 2020 Finance Organizations and Markets Conference, 2021 Finance Symposium, 2021 Financial Management Association Annual Meeting, 2021 International Young Finance Scholar Conference, 2020 PhD Nordic Finance Workshop, 2021 Nordic Initiative for Corporate Economics Conference, 2021 Midwest Finance Association Annual Meeting, 2021 SFS Cavalcade North America, 2021 Vietnam Symposium in Banking and Finance, and 2021 World Finance Conference. This project has received partial financial support from Tuck’s Lindenauer Forum for Governance Research and from the Norwegian Research Council (NRC #273678 “Incentives, Access to Capital, and Innovation”).

References

Alexandridis, G.; Antypas, N.; and Travlos, N.. “Value Creation from M&As: New Evidence.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 45 (2017), 632650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebchuk, L.; Cohen, A.; and Ferrell, A.. “What Matters in Corporate Governance?Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 783827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bena, J.; Ferreira, M. A.; Matos, P.; and Pires, P.. “Are Foreign Investors Locusts? The Long-Term Effects of Foreign Institutional Ownership.” Journal of Financial Economics, 126 (2017), 122146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betton, S.; Eckbo, B. E.; Thompson, R.; and Thorburn, K. S.. “Merger Negotiations with Stock Market Feedback.” Journal of Finance, 69 (2014), 17051745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, J. C.Chap. 22: Mergers, Acquisitions and Restructuring: Types, Regulation, and Patterns of Practice.” In Oxford Handbook on Corporate Law and Finance, Gordon, J. and Ringe, W.-G., eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2018).Google Scholar
Coffee, J. J.Regulating the Market for Corporate Control: A Critical Assessment of the Tender Offer’s Role in Corporate Governance.” Columbia Law Review, 84 (1984), 11451296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Rin, M.; Hellman, T.; and Puri, M., “Chap. 8: A Survey of Venture Capital Research.” In Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance, Vol. 2, Constantinides, R. S. G., and Harris, M., eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland (2013), 573648.Google Scholar
Dambra, M.; Field, L. Casares; and Gustafson, M. T.. “The JOBS Act and IPO Volume: Evidence that Disclosure Costs Affect the IPO Decision.” Journal of Financial Economics, 116 (2015), 121143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dathan, M., and Xiong, Y.. “Too Much Information? Increasing Firms’ Information Advantages in the IPO Process.” Working Paper, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demirguc-Kunt, A., and Maksimovic, V.. “Law, Finance, and Firm Growth.” Journal of Finance, 53 (1998), 21072137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dessaint, O.; Eckbo, B. E.; and Golubov, A.. “Bidder-Specific Synergies and the Evolution of Acquirer Returns.” Management Science, forthcoming (2024).Google Scholar
Djankov, S.; Porta, R. L.; Lopez-de-Silanes, F.; and Shleifer, A.. “The Law and Economics of Self-Dealing.” Journal of Financial Economics, 88 (2008), 430465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doidge, C.; Karolyi, G. A.; and Stulz, R. M.. “The U.S. Left Behind? Financial Globalization and the Rise of IPOs Outside the U.S.Journal of Financial Economics, 110 (2013), 546573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doidge, C.; Karolyi, G. A.; and Stulz, R. M.. “The U.S. Listing Gap.” Journal of Financial Economics, 123 (2017), 464487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckbo, B. E.; Makaew, T.; and Thorburn, K. S.. “Are Stock-Financed Takeovers Opportunistic?Journal of Financial Economics, 128 (2018), 443465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckbo, B. E.; Malenko, A.; and Thorburn, K. S.. “Strategic Decisions in Takeover Auctions: Recent Developments.” Annual Review of Financial Economics, 11 (2020), 237276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckbo, B. E., and Norli, Ø.. “Liquidity Risk, Leverage and Long-Run IPO Returns.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 11 (2005), 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckbo, B. E.; Phillips, G.; and Sorensen, M. (eds). Handbook of the Economics of Corporate Finance, Private Equity and Entrepreneurial Finance: Vol. 1. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier/North-Holland (2023).Google Scholar
Eckbo, B. E., and Thorburn, K. S.. “Corporate Restructuring.” Foundations and Trends in Finance, 7 (2013), 159288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewens, M., and Farre-Mensa, J.. “The Deregulation of the Private Equity Markets and the Decline in IPOs.” Review of Financial Studies, 33 (2020), 54635509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “New Lists: Fundamentals and Survival Rates.” Journal of Financial Economics, 73 (2004), 229269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, L. C., and Karpoff, J. M.. “Takeover Defenses of IPO Firms.” Journal of Finance, 57 (2002), 18571889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, X.; Ritter, J. R.; and Zhu, Z.. “Where Have All the IPOs Gone?Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48 (2013), 16631692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harford, J.What Drives Merger Waves?Journal of Financial Economics, 77 (2005), 529560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, K.; Kadyrzhanova, D.; and Lee, S.. “Do Classified Boards Deter Takeovers? Evidence from Merger Waves.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 59 (2024), 759–795.Google Scholar
Kwon, S.; Lowry, M.; and Qian, Y.. “Mutual Fund Investments in Private Firms.” Journal of Financial Economics, 136 (2020), 407443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, R.; Lopez-de-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R.. “Legal Determinants of External Finance.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 11311150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lattanzio, G.; Megginson, W. L.; and Sanati, A.. “Dissecting the Listing Gap: Mergers, Private Equity, or Regulation?Journal of Financial Markets, 65 (2023), 100,836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, R.Financial Development and Economic Growth: Views and Agenda.” Journal of Economic Literature, 35 (1997), 688726.Google Scholar
Loughran, T., and Ritter, J. R.. “Why Has IPO Underpricing Changed Over Time?Financial Management, 33 (2004), 537.Google Scholar
Phillips, G. M., and Zhdanov, A.. “R&D and the Incentives from Merger and Acquisition Activity.” Review of Financial Studies, 26 (2013), 3478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulsen, A. B., and Stegemoller, M.. “Moving from Private to Public Ownership: Selling Out to Public Firms Versus Initial Public Offerings.” Financial Management, 37 (2008), 81101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes-Kropf, M.; Robinson, D. T.; and Viswanathan, S.. “Valuation Waves and Merger Activity: The Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Financial Economics, 77 (2005), 561603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, J. R. “Initial Public Offerings: Median Age of IPOs Through 2023.” Available at https://site.warrington.ufl.edu/ritter/files/IPOs-Age.pdf (2022).Google Scholar
Schlingemann, F. P., and Stulz, R.. “Have Exchange-Listed Firms Become Less Important for the Economy?Journal of Financial Economics, 143 (2022), 927958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R.. “Stock Market Driven Acquisitions.” Journal of Financial Economics, 70 (2003), 295311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vijh, A. M.The Spinoff and Merger Ex-Date Effects.” Journal of Finance, 49 (1994), 581609.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Eckbo and Lithell supplementary material

Eckbo and Lithell supplementary material
Download Eckbo and Lithell supplementary material(File)
File 713.6 KB