Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:48:22.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investor Attrition and Fund Flows in Mutual Funds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2017

Abstract

We explore the properties of equity mutual funds that experience a loss of assets after poor performance. We document that both inflows and outflows are less sensitive to performance, because performance-sensitive investors leave or decide not to invest after bad performance. Consistent with the idea that attrition measures the sorting of performance-sensitive investors, we find that attrition has less of an impact on the fund’s flow–performance sensitivity for institutional funds where there is less dispersion in investor performance sensitivity. Also, attrition has no effect on the flow–performance sensitivity when attrition arises after good performance or investors invest for nonperformance reasons.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

The paper has benefited immensely from comments from Stephen Brown (the editor) and Murray Carlson (the referee). We are also grateful for comments by seminar participants at the University of Toronto, Copenhagen Business School, 2014 Midwest Finance Meetings, 2014 Financial Management Association European Meetings, 2014 Financial Management Association Meetings, and 2014 Northern Finance Association meetings and from comments by Che-Kuan Chen, Hannah Lea Huhn, Puneet Jaiprakash, and Laleh Samarbakhsh. Christoffersen gratefully acknowledges research support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council and the Global Risk Institute. This paper was written while Xu was at the University of Toronto. All errors are our own.

References

Berk, J. B., and Tonks, I.. “Return Persistence and Fund Flows in the Worst Performing Mutual Funds.” Working Paper, Stanford University (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, K. C.; Harlow, W. V.; and Starks, L. T.. “Of Tournaments and Temptations: An Analysis of Managerial Incentives in the Mutual Fund Industry.” Journal of Finance, 51 (1996), 85110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carhart, M. M.On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 5782.Google Scholar
Carhart, M. M.; Kaniel, R.; Musto, D. K.; and Reed, A. V.. “Leaning for the Tape: Evidence of Gaming Behavior in Equity Mutual Funds.” Journal of Finance, 57 (2002), 661693.Google Scholar
Chevalier, J., and Ellison, G.. “Risk Taking by Mutual Funds as a Response to Incentives.” Journal of Political Economy, 105 (1997), 11671200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christoffersen, S. E. K.Why Do Money Fund Managers Voluntarily Waive Their Fees?Journal of Finance, 56 (2001), 11171140.Google Scholar
Christoffersen, S. E. K., and Musto, D. K.. “Demand Curves and the Pricing of Money Management.” Review of Financial Studies, 15 (2002), 14991524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christoffersen, S. E. K.; Musto, D. K.; and Wermers, R.. “Investor Flows to Asset Managers: Causes and Consequences.” Annual Review of Financial Economics, 6 (2014), 289310.Google Scholar
Cooper, M.; Halling, M.; and Lemmon, M.. “Violations of the Law of One Fee in the Mutual Fund Industry.” Working Paper, University of Utah (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elton, E. J.; Gruber, M. J.; and Busse, J. A.. “Are Investors Rational? Choices among Index Funds.” Journal of Finance, 54 (2004), 261288.Google Scholar
Evans, R. B.Mutual Fund Incubation.” Journal of Finance, 65 (2010), 15811611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gil-Bazo, J., and Ruiz-Verdú, P.. “The Relation between Price and Performance in the Mutual Fund Industry.” Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 21532183.Google Scholar
Gormley, T. A., and Matsa, D. A.. “Common Errors: How To (and Not To) Control for Unobserved Heterogeneity.” Review of Financial Studies, 27 (2014), 617661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, J.; Wei, K.D.; and Yan, H.. “Participation Costs and the Sensitivity of Fund Flows to Past Performance.” Journal of Finance, 62 (2007), 12731311.Google Scholar
Ippolito, R. A.Consumer Reaction to Measures of Poor Quality: Evidence from the Mutual Fund Industry.” Journal of Law and Economics, 35 (1992), 4570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. T.Predictable Investment Horizons and Wealth Transfers among Mutual Fund Shareholders.” Journal of Finance, 59 (2004), 19792012.Google Scholar
Lynch, A. W., and Musto, D. K.. “How Investors Interpret Past Fund Returns.” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 20332058.Google Scholar
Petersen, M. A.Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 435480.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. M.Root-N-Consistent Semiparametric Regression.” Econometrica, 56 (1988), 931954.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A.A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer’s Behavior.” Economica, 5 (1938), 6171.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A.Consumption Theory in Terms of Revealed Preference.” Economica, 15 (1948), 243253.Google Scholar
Schwartz, E. S., and Torous, W. N.. “Prepayment and the Valuation of Mortgage-Backed Securities.” Journal of Finance, 44 (1989), 375392.Google Scholar
Sirri, E. R., and Tufano, P.. “Costly Search and Mutual Fund Flows.” Journal of Finance, 53 (1998), 15891622.Google Scholar
Varian, H. R.Revealed Preference.” Samuelsonian Economics and the Twenty-First Century. Szenberg, M., Ramrattan, L., and Gottesman, A. A., eds. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press (2006), chap. 5.Google Scholar
Wermers, R.Mutual Fund Performance: An Empirical Decomposition into Stock-Picking Talent, Style, Transactions, Costs, and Expenses.” Journal of Finance, 55 (2000), 16551695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar