Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:10:26.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inter-Firm Inventor Collaboration and Path-Breaking Innovation: Evidence From Inventor Teams Post-Merger

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2022

Kai Li Open the ORCID record for Kai Li [Opens in a new window]  and
Jin Wang
Kai Li*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia Sauder School of Business
Jin Wang
Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University Lazaridis School of Business and Economics [email protected]
*
[email protected] (corresponding author)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Using a large and novel data set over the period of 1976 to 2019 tracking inventors’ career paths following mergers and acquisitions, we show that collaboration between acquirer and target inventors post-merger is associated with more path-breaking patents than those filed by either acquirer or target inventor-only teams. We further show that such collaboration is more important in improving acquirers’ innovation capabilities than hiring target inventors and knowledge spillovers. Finally, we show that recombining tacit knowledge embodied in the human capital of acquirer and target inventors is likely the mechanism. We conclude that inter-firm inventor collaboration is one key means for achieving synergies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , May 2023 , pp. 1144 - 1171
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington

Footnotes

We thank an anonymous referee, Ramin Baghat (discussant), Shai Bernstein, Bo Bian, Alice Bonaime, Alvin Chen, Ding Dong, Mara Faccio (the editor), Yuan Gao, Mariassunta Giannetti, Isaac Hacamo, Camille Hebert, Po-Hsuan Hsu, Dalida Kadyrzhanova, Steve Karolyi, Omesh Kini, Sandy Klasa, Xing Liu, Guangli Lu, Antonio Macias, Jean-Marie Meier (discussant), Koray Sayili, Merih Sevilir (discussant), Tim Simcoe (discussant), Elena Simintzi (discussant), Wenyu Wang, Mike Woeppel, Qinxi Wu, Ting Xu, seminar participants at Baylor University, Carnegie Mellon University, Central University of Finance and Economics, Chapman University, Chinese Academy of Finance and Development, City University of Hong Kong, Development Bank of Japan, Georgia State University, Indiana University, Renmin University, Temple University, Texas Christian University, UBC, University of Arizona, Wilfrid Laurier University, and York University, and participants at the 2019 FMA European Conference, the 2019 Workshop on Corporate Governance and Investor Activism, the 2020 SFA Conference, the 2020 UBC Winter Finance Conference, the 2020 SFS Cavalcade, the 2020 Intellectual Property and Technology Markets Conference, the 2021 AFA Meetings, the 2021 EFA Meetings, and the 2021 FMA Meetings for helpful comments. We thank Xing Liu and William Zheng for excellent research assistance. Li and Wang acknowledge financial support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Grant Numbers: 435-2018-0037 and 435-2019-0425, respectively), and Li acknowledges financial support from the Sauder Exploratory Grants Program, the PH&N Center for Financial Research/Bureau of Asset Management, the Beijing Outstanding Young Scientist Program (BJJWZYJH01201910034034), and the 111 Project (B20094). All errors are our own.

References

Ahuja, G., and Katila, R.. “Technological Acquisitions and the Innovation Performance of Acquiring Firms: A Longitudinal Study.” Strategic Management Journal, 22 (2001), 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balsmeier, B.; Fleming, L.; and Manso, G.. “Independent Boards and Innovation.” Journal of Financial Economics, 123 (2017), 536–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bena, J., and Li, K.. “Corporate Innovations and Mergers and Acquisitions.” Journal of Finance, 69 (2014), 1923–1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, S.; Diamond, R.; McQuade, T.; and Pousada, B.. “The Contribution of High-Skilled Immigrants to Innovation in the United States.” Working Paper, Stanford University (2019).Google Scholar
Bloom, N.; Jones, C. I.; Van Reenen, J.; and Webb, M.. “Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find?” American Economic Review, 110 (2020), 1104–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chemmanur, T. J.; Loutskina, E.; and Tian, X.. “Corporate Venture Capital, Value Creation, and Innovation.” Review of Financial Studies, 27 (2014), 2434–2473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, W. M., and Levinthal, D. A.. “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1990), 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, C.; Ederer, F.; and Ma, S.. “Killer Acquisitions.” Journal of Political Economy, 129 (2021), 649–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggers, J. P., and Kaul, A.. “Motivation and Ability? A Behavioral Perspective on the Pursuit of Radical Invention in Multi-Technology Incumbents.” Academy of Management Journal, 61 (2018), 67–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enkel, E.; Gassmann, O.; and Chesbrough, H.. “Open R&D and Open Innovation: Exploring the Phenomenon.” R&D Management, 39 (2009), 311–316.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, T., and Liu, X.. “Shared Culture and Technological Innovation: Evidence from Corporate R&D Teams.” Working Paper, Texas A&M University (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulghieri, P., and Sevilir, M.. “Mergers, Spinoffs, and Employee Incentives.” Review of Financial Studies, 24 (2011), 2207–2241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulghieri, P., and Sevilir, M.. “Human Capital Integration in Mergers and Acquisitions.” Working Paper, UNC-Chapel Hill (2019).Google Scholar
Griffin, D.; Li, K.; and Xu, T.. “Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Innovation: International Evidence.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 56 (2021), 123–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, S. J., and Hart, O. D.. “The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration.” Journal of Political Economy, 94 (1986), 691–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, O. D., and Holmström, B.. “A Theory of Firm Scope.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125 (2010), 483–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, O. D., and Moore, J.. “Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm.” Journal of Political Economy, 98 (1990), 1119–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmström, B., and Roberts, J.. “The Boundaries of the Firm Revisited.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12 (1998), 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hombert, J., and Matray, A.. “The Real Effects of Lending Relationships on Innovative Firms and Inventor Mobility.” Review of Financial Studies, 30 (2017), 2413–2445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, A. B. “Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms’ Patents, Profits, and Market Value.” American Economic Review, 76 (1986), 984–1001.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. B.; Trajtenberg, M.; and Henderson, R.. “Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108 (1993), 577–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaravel, X.; Petkova, N.; and Bell, A.. “Team-Specific Capital and Innovation.” American Economic Review, 108 (2018), 1034–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, B. F. “The Burden of Knowledge and the “Death of the Renaissance Man”: Is Innovation Getting Harder?” Review of Economic Studies, 76 (2009), 283–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogan, L.; Papanikolaou, D.; Seru, A.; and Stoffman, N.. “Technological Innovation, Resource Allocation, and Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132 (2017), 665–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogut, B., and Zander, U.. “Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology.” Organization Science, 3 (1992), 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogut, B., and Zander, U.. “What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning.” Organization Science, 7 (1996), 502–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagaras, S. “Corporate Takeovers and Labor Restructuring.” Working Paper, University of Pittsburgh (2020).Google Scholar
Lee, K. H.; Mauer, D. C.; and Xu, E. Q.. “Human Capital Relatedness and Mergers and Acquisitions.” Journal of Financial Economics, 129 (2018), 111–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard-Barton, D. Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press (1995).Google Scholar
Li, K.; Mai, F.; Shen, R.; and Yan, X.. “Measuring Corporate Culture Using Machine Learning.” Review of Financial Studies, 34 (2021) (A Special Issue on Big Data in Finance), 3265–3315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, K.; Qiu, B.; and Shen, R.. “Organization Capital and Mergers and Acquisitions.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 53 (2018), 1871–1909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, K.; Qiu, J.; and Wang, J.. “Technology Conglomeration, Strategic Alliances, and Corporate Innovation.” Management Science, 65 (2019), 5065–5090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, R. E. Jr., and Moll, B.. “Knowledge Growth and the Allocation of Time.” Journal of Political Economy, 122 (2014), 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, W.; Ouimet, P.; and Simintzi, E.. “Mergers and Acquisitions, Technological Change and Inequality.” Working Paper, UNC-Chapel Hill (2018).Google Scholar
Maksimovic, V., and Phillips, G.. “The Market for Corporate Assets: Who Engages in Mergers and Asset Sales and Are There Efficiency Gains?” Journal of Finance, 56 (2001), 2019–2065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maksimovic, V.; Phillips, G.; and Prabhala, N. R.. “Post-Merger Restructuring and the Boundaries of the Firm.” Journal of Financial Economics, 102 (2011), 317–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, M.; Strumsky, D.; and Fleming, L.. “Mobility, Skills, and the Michigan Non-Compete Experiment.” Management Science, 55 (2009), 875–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowery, D. C.; Oxley, J. E.; and Silverman, B. S.. “Strategic Alliances and Interfirm Knowledge Transfer.” Strategic Management Journal, 17 (1996), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phene, A.; Tallman, S.; and Almeida, P.. “When Do Acquisitions Facilitate Technological Exploration and Exploitation?” Journal of Management, 38 (2012), 753–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, G. M., and Zhdanov, A.. “R&D and the Incentives from Merger and Acquisition Activity.” Review of Financial Studies, 26 (2013), 34–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes-Kropf, M., and Robinson, D. T.. “The Market for Mergers and the Boundaries of the Firm.” Journal of Finance, 63 (2008), 1170–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoar, A. 2002. “The Effect of Diversification on Firm Productivity.” Journal of Finance, 57 (2002), 2379–2403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seru, A. “Firm Boundaries Matter: Evidence from Conglomerates and R&D Activity.” Journal of Financial Economics, 111 (2014), 381–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sevilir, M., and Tian, X.. “Acquiring Innovation.” Working Paper, Indiana University (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, J., and Fleming, L.. “Lone Inventors as Sources of Breakthroughs: Myth or Reality?” Management Science, 56 (2010), 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, J.; Almeida, P.; and Wu, G.. “Learning–by–Hiring: When Is Mobility More Likely to Facilitate Interfirm Knowledge Transfer?” Management Science, 49 (2003), 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, G., and Yang, L.. “The Human Factor in Acquisitions: Cross-Industry Labor Mobility and Corporate Diversification.” Working Paper, University of Maryland (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A., and Greve, H. R.. “Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge Combination and Experience in Innovative Teams.” Academy of Management Journal, 49 (2006), 723–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzman, M. L. “Recombinant Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113 (1998), 331–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, S. “Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets.” In The Competitive Challenge—Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal, Teece, D. J., ed. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger (1987), 159–184.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Li and Wang supplementary material

Li and Wang supplementary material
Download Li and Wang supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 342.9 KB