Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:42:50.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hedge Funds: The Living and the Dead

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Abstract

In this paper, I examine survivorship bias in hedge fund returns by comparing two large databases. I find that the survivorship bias exceeds 2% per year. Results of survivorship bias by investment styles indicate that the biases are different across styles. I reconcile the conflicting results about survivorship bias in previous studies by showing that the two major hedge fund databases contain different amounts of dissolved funds. Empirical results show that poor performance is the main reason for a fund's disappearance. Furthermore, I find that there are significant differences in fund returs, inception date, net assets value, incentive fee, management fee, and investment styles forthe 465 common funds covered by both databases. Mismatching between reported returns andthe percentage change in NAVs can partially explain the differences in returns.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106. I thank Stephen Brown (the editor), Anurag Gupta, David Hsieh (the referee), Ji-Chai Lin, Tim Loughran, Ranga Narayanan, Ajai Singh, Sam Thomas, and seminar participants at Case Association International for helpful comments. The paper was supported by a research grant from the Weatherhead School of Management at Case Western Reserve University. I am grateful of Hedge Fund Research, Inc. and TASS Management Limited for providing the data.

References

Ackermann, C.; McEnally, R.; and ravenscraft, D.. “The Performance of Hedge Funds: Risk, Return and Incentives.” Journal of Finance, 54 (06 1999), 833874.10.1111/0022-1082.00129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. J.; and Goetzmann, W. N.. “Performance Persistence.” Journal of Finance, 50 (06 1995), 679–698.Google Scholar
Brown, S. J.; Goetzmann, W. N.; and Ibbotson, R. G.. “Offshore Hedge Funds: Survivial and Performance 1989–1995”. Journal of Business, 72 (01 1999), 91117.10.1086/209603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. J.; Goetzmann, W. N.; and Ibboston, R. G.. “Offshore Hedge Funds: Survival and Performance 1989–1995”. Journal of Business, 72 (01 1999), 91117.10.1086/209603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. J.; Goetzmann, W. N.; Ibbotson, R. G.; and Ross, S. A.. “Survivorshipo Bias in Performance Studies”. Review of Financial Studies, 5 (Winter 1992), 553–580.10.1093/rfs/5.4.553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, W., and Hsieh, D. A.. “Performance Characteristics of Hedge Funds and CTA Funds: Natural versus Spurious Biases.” Unpubl. Mannuscript, Duke Univ. (1998).Google Scholar
Fung, W., and Hsieh, D. A.. “Empirical Characteristics of Dynamic Trading Strategies: The Case of Hedge Funds.” Review of Financial Studies, 10 (Summer 1997a), 275302.10.1093/rfs/10.2.275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, W., and Hsieh, D. A.. “The Information Content of Performance Track Records: Investment Style and Survivorship Bias in the Historical Returns of Commodity Trading Advisors.” Journal of Portfolto Management, 24 (Fall 1997b), 3041.10.3905/jpm.1997.409630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinblatt, M., and Titman, S., “Mutual Fund Performance: An Analysis of Quarterly Portfolio Hold-ings.” Journal of Business, 62 (07 1989), 393416.10.1086/296468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, B. “On the Performance of Hedge Funds.” Financial Analysts Journal, 55 (07/08 1999), 72–85.10.2469/faj.v55.n4.2287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malkiel, B. G. “Returns from Investing in Equity Mutual Funds 1971 to 1991.Journal of Finance, 50 (06 1999), 549–572.Google Scholar
Sharpe, W. F. “Asset Allocation: Management Style and Performance Measurement.” Journal of Portfolto Management, 18 (Winter 1992), 719.10.3905/jpm.1992.409394CrossRefGoogle Scholar