Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T17:51:03.004Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Government Regulation and Structural Change in the Corporate Acquisitions Market: The Impact of the Williams Act

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Paul H. Malatesta  and
Rex Thompson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents evidence on how the Williams Act affected the corporate acquisitions market. The acquisition process is modeled and three hypotheses about the Act's effects are discussed. These hypotheses imply differing restrictions on how the Act changes the model's parameters. Parameter changes are estimated but we are unable to reliably discriminate between two of the three hypotheses using the classical statistical testing approach, though the third hypothesis is reliably rejected. Bayesian analysis using a diffuse prior is employed to make formal probability comparisons among the hypotheses. The most probable hypothesis, according to the results, implies that the Williams Act reduced the expected gross present value of acquisition attempts.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , September 1993 , pp. 363 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Black, F. “Capital Market Equilibrium with Restricted Borrowing.” Journal of Business, 45 (07 1972), 444–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, M. “Interfirm Tender Offers and the Market for Corporate Control.” Journal of Business, 53 (10 1980), 345–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, P., and Ruback, R.. “Tender Offers and Stockholder Returns: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics, 5 (12 1977), 351–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, J., and Harris, R.. “Shareholder Wealth Effects of Corporate Takeovers: The U.K. Experience 1955–1985.” Journal of Financial Economics, 23 (08 1989), 225–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrell, G., and Bradley, M.. “The Economic Effects of Federal and State Regulations of Cash Tender Offers.” Journal of Law and Economics, 23 (10 1980), 371–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M., and Ruback, R.. “The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence.” Journal of Financial Economics, 11 (04 1983), 5–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, G.; Griffiths, W.; Hill, R.; and Lee, T.. The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (1980).Google Scholar
Kummer, D., and Hoffmeister, R.. “Valuation Consequences of Cash Tender Offers.” Journal of Finance, 33 (05 1978), 505–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malatesta, P., and Thompson, R.. “Partially Anticipated Events: A Model of Stock Price Reactions with an Application to Corporate Acquisitions.” Journal of Financial Economics, 14 (06 1985), 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malatesta, P., and Thompson, R.. “Stock Price Reactions to Partially Anticipated Events: Evidence on the Economic Impact of Corporate Acquisition Attempts.” Research in Finance, 6 (1986), 119–148.Google Scholar
Nathan, K., and O'Keefe, T.. “The Rise in Takeover Premiums: An Exploratory Study.” Journal of Financial Economics, 23 (06 1989), 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schipper, K., and Thompson, R.. “Evidence on the Capitalized Value of Merger Activity for Acquiring Firms.” Journal of Financial Economics, 11 (04 1983), 85–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanken, J; “A Bayesian Approach to Testing Portfolio Efficiency.” Journal of Financial Economics, 19 (12 1987), 195–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swamy, P. A. V. B. “Efficient Inference in a Random Coefficient Regression Model.” Econometrica, 38 (03 1970), 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, H. “A Heteroskedasticity-consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica, 48 (05 1980), 817–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zellner, A.Introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics. NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (1971).Google Scholar