Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T05:27:32.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Financing Decisions and the Theory of the Firm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Extract

A firm periodically makes three major classes of decisions that determine its structure as reflected on its balance sheet. The first relates to the total amount of investment as well as the distribution of this total amount among different types of assets. This decision determines the size of the firm and the structure of the “assets” side of its balance sheet. The second is concerned with the relative proportion of equity versus debt capital to be used in financing the firm. This decision determines the structure of the “sources” side of the balance sheet by establishing relative sizes of liabilities and stockholders' worth. The third is the choice of the proportion of the equity which should be raised through the retention of earnings and the proportion to be raised through the sale of new stock. This decision determines the dividends that will be distributed and the composition of the stockholders' worth portion of the balance sheet.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Anderson, W. H. L.Corporate Finance and Fixed Investment: An Econometric Study. Boston, Mass.: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1964.Google Scholar
[2]Bellman, R.Introduction to Matrix Analysis, 2nd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.Google Scholar
[3]Bosworth, B.Patterns of Corporate External Financing.Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, vol. 2 (1971), pp. 253279.Google Scholar
[4]Chetty, V. K. “Formulation and Sequential Estimation of Dynamic Models.” Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1970.Google Scholar
[5]Chetty, V. K., and Sankar, U.. “On the Formulation of Distributed Lag Models.” Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1970.Google Scholar
[6]Coddington, E. A., and Levinson, N.. Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1955.Google Scholar
[7]Dhrymes, P. J., and Kurz, M.. “Investment, Dividends, and External Finance Behavior of Firms.” In Determinants of Investment Behavior, edited by Ferber, R.. Universities-National Bureau Conference Series, No. 18. New York: Columbia University Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research, 1967.Google Scholar
[8]Eisner, R., and Strotz, R. H.. “Determinants of Business Investment.” In Commission on Money and Credit, Impacts of Monetary Policy. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1963.Google Scholar
[9]Fama, E. F., and Miller, M. H.. The Theory of Finance. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1972.Google Scholar
[10]Gould, J. P.Adjustment Costs in the Theory of Investment of the Firm.Review of Economic Studies, January 1968, pp. 4755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Hadley, G., and Kemp, M. C.. Variational Methods in Economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1971.Google Scholar
[12]Hamada, R. S.Portfolio Analysis, Market Equilibrium and Corporation Finance.The Journal of Finance, March 1969, pp. 1331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Hanoch, G., and Levy, H.. “The Efficiency Analysis of Choices Involving Risk.Review of Economic Studies, July 1969, pp. 335346.Google Scholar
[14]Imai, Y. “An Integration of Neoclassical Theory of Optimal Capital Accumulation and Corporate Financial Theories.” Ph.D. dissertation. Rice University, 1971.Google Scholar
[15]Jorgenson, D. W.Capital Theory and Investment Behavior.The American Economic Review, May 1963, pp. 247259.Google Scholar
[16]Jorgenson, D. W.Econometric Studies of Investment Behavior: A Survey.Journal of the Economic Literature, December 1971, pp. 11111147.Google Scholar
[17]Kuh, E.Capital Stock Growth: A Microeconometric Approach, 2nd ed.Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1971.Google Scholar
[18]Lucas, R. E.Optimal Investment Policy and the Flexible Accelerator.International Economic Review, February 1967, pp. 7885.Google Scholar
[19]Meyer, J., and Kuh, E.. The Investment Decision. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
[20]Miller, M. H., and Modigliani, F.. “Dividend Policy, Growth, and the Valuation of Shares.Journal of Business, October 1961, pp. 411433.Google Scholar
[21]Miller, M. H., and Modigliani, F.. “Some Estimates of the Cost of Capital to the Electric Utility Industry 1954–57.The American Economic Review, June 1966, pp. 333391.Google Scholar
[22]Modigliani, F., and Miller, M. H.. “The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance, and the Theory of Investment.The American Economic Review, June 1958, pp. 261297.Google Scholar
[23]Modigliani, F., and Miller, M. H.. “Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Correction.The American Economic Review, June 1963, pp. 433443.Google Scholar
[24]Mossin, J.Security Pricing and Investment Criteria in Competitive Markets.The American Economic Review, December 1969, pp. 749756.Google Scholar
[25]Quirk, J. P.The Capital Structure of Firms and the Risk of Failure.International Economic Review, May 1961, pp. 210228.Google Scholar
[26]Smith, V. L.Corporate Financial Theory Under Uncertainty.Quarterly Journal of Economics, August 1970, pp. 451471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27]Smith, V. L.Default Risk, Scale, and the Homemade Leverage Theorem.The American Economic Review, March 1972, pp. 6676.Google Scholar
[28]Stiglitz, J. E.Some Aspects of the Pure Theory of Corporate Finance: Bankruptcies and Take-overs.The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Autumn 1972, pp. 458482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[29]Stiglitz, J. E.A Re-Examination of the Modigliani-Miller Theorem. The American Economic Review, December 1969, pp. 7893.Google Scholar
[30]Struble, R. A.Nonlinear Differential Equations. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.Google Scholar
[31]Tinsley, P. A. “On Optimal Dynamic Adjustment of Quasi-Fixed Factors.” Special Studies Paper #9, Federal Reserve Board, 1970.Google Scholar
[32]Ungar, M. “Rational Entrepreneurial Behavior and the Demand for Investment and Borrowing.” Ph.D. dissertation, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, 1970.Google Scholar
[33]Vickers, D.The Theory of the Firm: Production, Capital, and Finance. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968.Google Scholar