Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:23:13.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evidence on the Presence and Causes of Serial Correlation in Market Model Residuals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Robert A. Schwartz  and
David K. Whitcomb
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Studies of returns on common stocks have observed positive market index autocorrelation (see Fisher [10] and Dimson [6]), negative autocorrelation of market model residuals (see Fisher [10] and Fama, Fisher, Jensen, and Roll [9]), and a deterioration in the market model R2 as the returns measurement period is shortened (see Pogue and Solnik [17], Altman, Jacquillat, and Levasseur [1], and Schwartz and Whitcomb [19]). We present further evidence on the strength of these findings and show that they are concurrent events. That is, common factors can explain both positive index and negative residual autocorrelation, and these correlation patterns in turn cause R2 to fall as the differencing interval is shortened.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , June 1977 , pp. 291 - 313
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Altman, E. I.; Jacquillat, B.; and Levasseur, M.. “Comparative Analysis of Risk Measures: France and the United States.” Journal of Finance (1974), pp. 1495–1511.Google Scholar
[2]Barton, A. P. “Note on Unbiased Estimation of the Squared Multiple Correlation Coefficient.” Statistica Neerlandica, Vol. 16, No. 2 (1962), pp. 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Cohen, K. J.; Maier, S. F.; Ness, W. L. Jr.; Okuda, H.; Schwartz, R. A.; and Whitcomb, D. K.. “The Impact of Designated Market Makers on Security Prices: I, Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Banking and Finance (forthcoming, September 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Cohen, K. J.; Maier, S. F.; Schwartz, R. A.; and Whitcomb, D. K.. “On the Existence of Serial Correlation in an Efficient Securities Market.” Salomon Brothers Center for the Study of Financial Institutions Working Paper No. 109, New York University (February 1977).Google Scholar
[5]Cootner, P. H., ed. The Random Character of Stock Market Prices. Cambridge, Mass.: The M.I.T. Press (1964).Google Scholar
[6]Dimson, Elroy.Dependencies in Stock Market Indices.Presented at the Third Congress on Financial Theory and Decision Models, Garmisch-Partenkirchen(June 1974).Google Scholar
[7]Fama, E. F. “The Behavior of Stock Market Prices.” Journal of Business (January 1965), pp. 34–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Fama, E. F. “Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work.” Journal of Finance (May 1970), pp. 383–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Fama, E. F.; Fisher, L.; Jensen, M.; and Roll, R.. “The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information.” International Economic Review (February 1969), pp. 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Fisher, L. “Some New Stock Market Indexes.” Journal of Business (January 1966), pp. 191–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Levhari, D., and Levy, H.. “The Capital Asset Pricing Model and the Investment Horizon.” Review of Economics and Statistics (February 1977), pp. 92–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Mandelbrot, B. “The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices.” Journal of Business (October 1963), pp. 394–419. Reprinted in Cootner [5].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Merton, R. “Optimum Consumption and Portfolio Rules in a Continuous-Time Model.” Journal of Economic Theory (December 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Montgomery, D. B., and Morrison, D. G.. “A Note on Adjusting R2.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 28, No. 4 (September 1973), pp. 1009–1013.Google Scholar
[15]Moore, A. B. “Some Characteristics of Changes in Common Stock Prices.” In Cootner [5], pp. 139–162.Google Scholar
[16]Officer, R. R. “The Distribution of Stock Returns.” Journal of the American Statistical Association (December 1972), pp. 807–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Pogue, G. A., and Solnik, B. H.. “The Market Model Applied to European Stocks: Some Empirical Results.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (December 1974), pp. 917–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Schwartz, R. A., and Whitcomb, D. K.. “Comment: Assessing the Impact of Stock Exchange Specialists on Stock Volatility.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (December 1976), pp. 901–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Schwartz, R. A. “The Time-Variance Relationship: Evidence on Autocorrelation in Common Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance (March 1977), pp. 41–55.Google Scholar
[20]Smith, K. V. “The Effect of Intervaling on Estimating Parameters of the Capital Asset Pricing Model.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (forthcoming).Google Scholar
[21]Working, H. “Investigation of Economic Expectation.” American Economic Review (May 1949), pp. 164–165.Google Scholar
[22]Yamada, H. “Modern Theories of Investment Applied to an Empirical Study of the Japanese Stock Market.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, New York University Graduate School of Business Administration (June 1975).Google Scholar