Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 April 2022
Average cumulative abnormal returns around proxy statements containing “in-depth” disclosures of planning for CEO succession are significantly positive indicating that succession planning is a value-added undertaking. Exploiting a quasi-natural experiment based on a 2009 SEC ruling that induced more succession planning disclosures, we find that succession planning is not value-adding for all firms. Rather, succession planning is value-enhancing for larger, more complex, and more stable firms. Importantly, CEO succession planning appears to be value reducing for smaller, simpler, and less stable firms.
An earlier draft of this article was previously circulated under the title “Just Talk? CEO Succession Plan Disclosure, Corporate Governance and Firm Value.” We thank Sergiy Chernenko, David Denis, Diane Denis, Mara Faccio, Kate Holland, Kose John, Ping Liu, Ron Masulis, Lalitha Naveen (the referee), Henri Servaes, Michael Woeppel, Deniz Yavuz, and David Yermack, and the participants at the 2019 Financial Management Association annual meeting for helpful comments and suggestions.