Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:01:09.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diversification in a Three-Moment World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Michael A. Simkowitz  and
William L. Beedles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Of the behavioral recommendations garnered from modern capital market theory, few, if any, generalizations have been documented as convincingly as the simple advice to hold several assets in one's portfolio. Sharpe made such a conclusion perfectly clear when he stated [27, p. 184]:

If the market is efficient and if an investor is privy to no special information or predictive power, what should he do? First, and most important: diversify.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 13 , Issue 5 , December 1978 , pp. 927 - 941
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Anderson, Theodore A.An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1958).Google Scholar
[2]Arditti, Fred D. “Risk and the Required Return on Equity.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 22, No. 1 (05 1967), pp. 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Arditti, Fred D. “Another Look at Mutual Fund Performance.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 6, No. 3 (06 1971), pp. 909–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Arditti, Fred D. “Skewness and Investors’ Decisions: A Reply.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 10, No. 1 (03 1975), pp. 173–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Arditti, Fred D., and Levy, Haim. “Portfolio Efficiency Analysis in Three Moments: The Multiperiod Case.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 30, No. 3 (06 1975),.pp. 797–809.Google Scholar
[6]Beedles, William L., and Simkowitz, Michael A.. “A Note on Skewness and Data Errors.” Journal of Finance, vol. 33, No. 1 (05 1978), pp. 288–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Bierwag, G. O. “The Rationale of the Mean-Standard Deviation Analysis: Comment.” American Economic Review, Vol. 64, No. 3 (06 1974), pp. 431–433.Google Scholar
[8]Blume, Marshall, and Friend, Irwin. “The Asset Structure of Individual Portfolios and Some Implications for Utility Functions.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 30, No. 2 (05 1975), pp. 585–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Borch, Karl. “The Rationale of the Mean-Standard Deviation Analysis: Comment.” American Economic Review, Vol. 64, No. 3 (06 1974), pp. 428–430.Google Scholar
[10]Croxton, Frederick E.; Cowden, Dudley J.; and Klein, Sidney. Applied General Statistics, 3rd ed.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc. (1967).Google Scholar
[11]Evans, John, and Archer, Stephen. “Diversification and the Reduction of Dispersion: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 23, No. 5 (12 1968), pp. 761–767.Google Scholar
[12]Fama, Eugene. “The Behavior of Stock Market Prices.” Journal of Business, Vol. 38, No. 1 (01 1965), pp. 34–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Fielitz, Bruce. “Indirect versus Direct Diversification.” Financial Management, Vol. 3, No. 4 (Winter 1974), pp. 54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Francis, Jack Clark. “Skewness and Investors’ Decisions.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 10, No. 1 (04 1975), pp. 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Hanoch, Giora, and Levy, Haim. “Efficient Portfolio Selection with Quadratic and Cubic Utility.” Journal of Business, Vol. 43, No. 2 (04 1970), pp. 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Jean, William. “The Extension of Portfolio Analysis to Three or More Parameters.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 6, No. 1 (01 1971), pp. 505–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Jean, William. “More on Multidimensional Portfolio Analysis.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 8, No. 3 (06 1973), pp. 475–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Kraus, Alan, and Litzenberger, Robert. “Skewness Preference and the Valuation of Risk Assets.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 31, No. 4 (09 1976), pp. 1085–1100.Google Scholar
[19]Levy, Haim. “The Rationale of the Mean-Standard Deviation Analysis: Comment.” American Economic Review, Vol. 64, No. 3 (06 1974), pp. 434–441.Google Scholar
[20]Lintner, John. “Security Prices, Risk, and Maximal Gains from Diversification.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 20, No. 5 (12 1965), pp. 587–615.Google Scholar
[21]Markowitz, Harry. “Portfolio Selection.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 7 (03 1952), pp. 77–91.Google Scholar
[22]McEnally, Richard W. “A Note on the Return Behavior of High Risk Common Stocks.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 29, No. 1 (03 1974), pp. 199–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Mossin, Jan. “Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market.” Econometrica, Vol. 34 (10 1966), pp. 768–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Pearson, E. S., and Hartley, H. O., eds. Biometrika Tables for Statisticians, 3rd ed., Vol. 1. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press (1966).Google Scholar
[25]Pettit, R. Richardson, and Westerfield, Randolph. “Using the Capital Asset Pricing Model to Predict Security Returns.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 9, No. 4 (09 1974), pp. 579–605.’CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26]Reback, Robert. “Risk and Return in CBOE and AMEX Option Trading.” Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 31, No. 4 (07/08 1975), pp. 42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27]Sharpe, William F.Portfolio Theory and Capital Markets. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company (1970).Google Scholar
[28]Sharpe, William F. “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 19, No. 3 (09 1964), pp. 425–442.Google Scholar
[29]Tsiang, S. C. “The Rationale of the Mean-Standard Deviation Analysis, Skewness Preference, and the Demand for Money.” American Economic Review, Vol. 62, No. 3 (06 1972), pp. 354–371.Google Scholar
[30]Tsiang, S. C. “The Rationale of the Mean-Standard Deviation Analysis: Reply and Errata for Original Article.” American Economic Review, Vol. 64, No. 3 (06 1974), pp. 442–450.Google Scholar