Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:21:07.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Discussion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Extract

As the authors, Donald L. Tuttle and William L. Wilbur, indicate in footnote 1 of their article, “A Multivariate Time-Series Investigation of Annual Returns on Highest Grade Corporate Bonds,” the equations tested in this paper seem to me to be ad hoc. The problem is not that I think the authors should have estimated a general equilibrium model of the economy, but rather that they have not provided a satisfactory explanation of the single equation they have tested. The use of a technique to choose among alternative variables on the basis of their ability to shrink the coefficient of multiple correlation could be taken as further evidence of the absence of a well-articulated theoretical relationship explaining annual returns on corporate bonds.

Type
Discussants
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hicks, J. R., Value and Capital (2nd ed.) (London: 1946).Google Scholar
Kessel, R., The Cyclical Behavior of the Term Structure of Interest Rates, Occasional Paper 91 (New York: NBER (1965).Google Scholar
Pyle, D. H., and Turnovsky, S. J., “Safety-First and Expected Utility Maximization in Mean-Standard Deviation Portfolio Analysis,” Review of Economics and Statistics (February 1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, W. F., “A Simplified Model for Portfolio Analysis,” Management Science (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar