Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T06:33:02.635Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Discussion: Signaling, Information Content, and the Reluctance to Cut Dividends

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Extract

Avner Kalay makes a point that managerial reluctance to cut dividends is a necessary condition for the existence of a signaling equilibrium in which dividends are employed as a signaling device. He argues, however, that the available empirical evidence is unable to confirm the reluctance to cut dividends. In particular, the well-known Lintner's (1956) partial adjustment model, which is often cited in support of the reluctance to cut dividends, is empirically indistinguishable from an alternative model which is devoid of such a reluctance. Kalay then conducts an alternative test, but it too leads to an inconclusive result on the issue.

Type
Signaling
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Haugen, R., and Senbet, L.. “New Perspectives on Informational Asymmetry and Agency Relationships.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (11 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Kalay, A.Signaling, Information Content, and the Reluctance to Cut Dividends.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (11 1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Ross, S.The Determination of Financial Structure: The Incentive Signaling Approach.The Bell Journal of Economics (Spring 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar