Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T03:20:59.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Direct Test of the Mixture of Distributions Hypothesis: Measuring the Daily Flow of Information

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Matthew Richardson  and
Tom Smith
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper proposes and conducts direct tests of the mixture of distributions model for stock prices. By exploiting the model's bivariate conditional normality of price changes and trading volume, these restrictions can be tested under very weak assumptions regarding the daily flow of information to the market. As a technical byproduct, important parameters governing the distribution of this unobservable information flow are estimated.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , March 1994 , pp. 101 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Admati, A., and Pfleiderer, P.. “A Theory of Intraday Patterns: Volume and Price Variability.” Review of Financial Studies, 1 (1988) 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blattberg, R., and Gonedes, N.. “A Comparison of the Stable and Student Distributions as Stochastic Models for Stock Prices.” Journal of Business, 47 (1974), 244–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, P. K. “A Subordinated Stochastic Process Model with Finite Variance for Speculative Prices.” Econometrica, 41 (1973), 135–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epps, T. W., and Epps, M. L.. “The Stochastic Dependence of Security Price Changes and Transactions Volumes: Implications for the Mixture of Distributions Hypothesis.” Econometrica, 44 (1976), 305–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, F. D., and Viswanathan, S.. “A Theory of Intraday Variations in Volumes, Variances and Trading Costs in Securities Markets.” Review of Financial Studies, 3 (1990), 593–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, F. D., and Viswanathan, S.. “Trading Volume, Return Volatility and Trading Costs.” Journal of Finance, 48 (1993a), 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, F. D., and Viswanathan, S.. “Can Speculative Trading Explain the Volume-Volatility Relation?” Working Paper, Duke Univ. (1993b).Google Scholar
Gallant, A. R.; Rossi, P. E.; and Tauchen, G.. “Stock Prices and Volume.” Review of Financial Studies, 5 (1992), 199–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, L. “Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moment Estimators.” Econometrica, 50 (07 1982), 1029–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, L. E. “Cross-Security Tests of the Mixture of Distributions Hypothesis.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 21 (03 1986), 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, L. E. “Transaction Data Tests of the Mixture of Distributions Hypothesis.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 22 (06 1987), 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingersoll, J.Theory of Financial Decision Making. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield (1987).Google Scholar
Jain, P., and Joh, G.. “The Dependence between Hourly Price Changes and Trading Volume.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 23 (09. 1988), 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamoureux, C. G., and Lastrapes, W. D.. “Heteroskedasticity in Stock Return Data: Volume versus GARCH Effects.” Journal of Finance, 45 (1990), 221–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamoureux, C. G., and Lastrapes, W. D.. “Endogenous Trading Volume and Momentum in Stock Return Volatility.” Working Paper, Washington Univ. and Univ. of Georgia (1993).Google Scholar
Nelson, Daniel B. “Arch Models as Diffusion Approximations.” Journal of Economics, 45 (1990), 7–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newey, W., and West, K.. “A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix.” Econometrica, 55 (05 1987), 703–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauchen, G. E., and Pitts, M.. “The Price Variability-Volume Relationship on Speculative Markets.” Econometrica, 51 (1983), 485–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar