Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T11:04:58.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Credit Policy in Lending Institutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Extract

This paper develops a credit-analysis model encompassing the accuracy of analytical methods, quality of applicants, cost of acquisition and analysis, profit from good loans, and losses from bad loans. Information generally available to the lending institution and subjective estimates can then be used to select from among alternative credit-granting systems the system with the greatest expected net present value. Each institution is thus able to find the credit granting system most appropriate for its particular market and analytical abilities.

The model's profit maximizing objective and broad scope make it useful for setting credit department standards of performance. Costs can be compared with theoretical values of performance computed from loss rates, acceptance rates, and market information. The conditional probabilities, the chances of making the correct decision, can also be estimated for use in comparing methods of analysis or individual analysts. Unlike the loss rate, the conditional probability is an independent, unbiased measure of a method's accuracy.

The example presented dealt with consumer installment loans, but the formulation is applicable to direct lending of any type. It provides the means for comparing loans with differing initial costs as well as widely varying risk classes and maturities. Financial institutions making direct loans add substantial values to capital supplied by the money and capital markets. The model is a theoretical formulation of the relationship between the cost and output of credit analysis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Altman, Edward I.Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy.” The Journal of Finance, September 1968, pp. 589609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Boggess, William P.Screen-Test Your Credit Risks.” Harvard Business Review, November–December 1967, pp. 113122.Google Scholar
[3]Edmister, Robert O.Financial Ratios and Credit Scoring for Small Business Loans.” Journal of Commercial Bank Lending, September 1971, pp. 1023.Google Scholar
[4]Hammer, Frederick S., and Orgler, Yair E.. “Developments in Credit Scoring for Commercial Loans.” Journal of Commercial Bank Lending, July 1969.Google Scholar
[5]Hettenhouse, George W., and Wentworth, Jack R.. “Credit Analysis Model—A New Look for Credit Scoring.” Journal of Commercial Bank Lending, December 1971, pp. 2632.Google Scholar
[6]Johnson, Robert W.Capital Budgeting. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc., 1970.Google Scholar
[7]Mehta, Dileep. “The Formulation of Credit Policy Models.” Management Science, October 1968, pp. 3050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Mehta, Dileep. “Optimal Credit Policy Selection: A Dynamic Approach.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, December 1970, pp. 421444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Myers, J. H., and Forgy, E. W.. “Development of Numerical Credit Evaluation Systems.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, September 1963, pp. 118127.Google Scholar
[10]Raiffa, Howard, and Schlaifer, Robert. Applied Statistical Decision Theory. Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1961.Google Scholar
[11]Sharpe, William F.Portfolio Theory and Capital Markets. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1970.Google Scholar
[12]Smith, Paul F. “Measuring Risk on Consumer Installment Credit.” Management Science, November 1964, pp. 327340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Weingartner, M. H. “Concepts and Utilization of Credit-Scoring Techniques.” Banking, February 1966, pp. 5153.Google Scholar