Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T05:00:57.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comment: “On the Use of Principal Components Analysis to Interpret Cross-Sectional Differences among Commercial Banks”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Marion L. Chiattello
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Robert J. Saunders [4] has demonstrated that, because of the high degree of linear interdependence among many of the variables commonly used in banking studies, it may be necessary to interpret explanatory variables in a cross-sectional regression equation, not as representing individual influences but as representing more general factors. He attempted to demonstrate how principal component analysis might be used to isolate and identify some of these general factors.

Type
Communications
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 9 , Issue 6 , December 1974 , pp. 1047 - 1051
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Bank Operating Statistics. Washington, D.C., April 1968.Google Scholar
[2]Rummell, R. J.Applied Factor Analysis. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
[3]Rummell, R. J. “Understanding Factor Analysis.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 11 (December 1968), pp. 444–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Saunders, R. J. “On the Interpretation of Models Explaining Cross Sectional Differences among Commercial Banks.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 4 (March 1969), pp. 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar