Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:32:42.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Call, Sinking Fund, and Term-To-Maturity Features of Corporate Bonds: An Empirical Investigation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Karlyn Mitchell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Do bond-issuing firms attempt to choose the call, sinking fund, and term-to-maturity features of bonds to improve shareholder wealth? This paper develops and tests two hypotheses about the determinants of bond features using a conditional logistic model. The model is estimated on a sample of bonds issued between 1982 and 1986. Model estimates show that a bond's call, sinking fund, and term-to-maturity features are statistically related to the issuing firm's retention ratio, ratio of convertible to long-term debt, two-year change in net operating income, and whether the firm is listed on the NYSE and included in the S&P400. These findings support the view that firms financing highquality projects, but facing information asymmetries, choose shorter-term (medium-term) callable bonds with and without the sinking fund feature.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 201 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnea, A.; Haugen, R.; and Senbet, L.. “A Rationale for Debt Maturity Structure and Call Provisions in the Agency Theoretic Framework.” Journal of Finance, 35 (12 1980), 1223–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnea, A.; Haugen, R.; and Senbet, L.. “Market Imperfections, Agency Problems, and Capital Structure.” Financial Management, 10 (Summer 1981), 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodie, Z., and Taggart, R.. “Future Investment Opportunities and the Value of the Call Provision on a Bond.” Journal of Finance, 33 (09 1978), 1187–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyce, W. M., and Kalotay, A. J.. “Tax Differentials and Callable Bonds.” Journal of Finance, 34 (09 1979), 825–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, M., and Schwartz, E. S.. “The Case for Convertibles.” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 1 (Summer 1988), 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brick, I., and Ravid, S. A.. “On the Relevance of Debt Maturity Structure.” Journal of Finance, 40 (12 1985), 1423–1437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brick, I., and Wallingford, B.. “The Relative Tax Benefits of Alternative Call Features in Corporate Debt.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 20 (03 1985), 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, K. B., and Spatt, C. S.. “A Strategic Analysis of Sinking Fund Bonds.” Journal of Financial Economics, 15 (09 1984), 399–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyl, E., and Joehnk, M. D.. “Sinking Funds and the Cost of Corporate Debt.” Journal of Finance, 34 (12 1979), 887–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flannery, M. J., “Asymmetric Information and Risky Debt Maturity Choice.” Journal of Finance, 41 (03 1986), 18–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, L., and Weil, R. L.. “Coping with the Risk of Interest Rate Fluctuations: Return to Bondholders from Naive and Optimal Strategies.” Journal of Business, 44 (10 1976), 408–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, T., and Singer, R. F.. “The Value of Corporate Debt with a Sinking Fund Provision.” Journal of Business, 57 (07 1984), 315–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jen, F. C., and Weil, J. E.. “The Deferred Call Provision and Corporate Bond Yields.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 3 (06 1968), 157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalotay, A. J. “Sinking Funds and the Realized Cost of Debt.” Financial Management, 11 (Spring 1982), 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, G. G. “Measuring and Managing Interest Rate Risk: A Primer.” Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Perspectives (01/02 1984), 16–29.Google Scholar
Kraus, A. “The Bond Refunding Decision in an Efficient Market.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 8 (12 1973), 793–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, A. “An Analysis of Call Provisions and the Corporate Refunding Decision.” Midland Corporate Finance Journal, 1 (Spring 1983), 46–60.Google Scholar
Lee, L. F. “Fully Recursive Probability Models and Multivariate Log-Linear Probability Models for the Analysis of Qualitative Data.” Journal of Econometrics, 16 (09 1981), 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingston, M. “Flattening of Bond Yield Curves.” Journal of Financial Research, 10 (Spring 1987), 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingston, M., and Jain, S.. “Flattening of Bond Yield Curves for Long Maturities.” Journal of Finance, 37 (03 1982), 157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddala, G. S.Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malitz, I. “On Financial Contracting: the Determinants of Bond Covenants.” Financial Management, 15 (Summer 1986), 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, W., and Yawitz, J.. “Optimal Terms of the Call Provision on a Corporate Bond.” Journal of Financial Research, 3 (Summer 1980), 202–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, S. C. “Determinants of Corporate Borrowing.” Journal of Financial Economics, 5 (11 1977), 147–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, S. C., and Majluf, N. S.. “Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions when Firms Have Information That Investors Do Not Have.” Journal of Financial Economics, 13 (06 1984), 187–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nerlove, M., and Press, S. J.. Univariate and Multivariate Log-Linear and Logistic Models. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation Report R-1306 (1973).Google Scholar
Ogden, J. P. “Determinants of the Relative Interest Rate Sensitivities of Corporate Bonds.” Financial Management, 16 (Spring 1987), 22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, J. P. “A Rationale for the Sinking-Fund Provision in a Quasicompetitive Corporate-Bond Market.” Journal of Business Research, 16 (02 1988), 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, E., and Schatzberg, J.. “Callable Bonds: A Risk-Reducing Signalling Mechanism.” Journal of Finance, 41 (09 1986), 935–949.Google Scholar
Rodriquez, R. J. “Default Risk, Yield Spreads, and Time to Maturity.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 23 (03 1988), 111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, P., and Strauss, R. P.. “Estimation of Models with Jointly Dependent Qualitative Variables: A Simultaneous Logit Approach.” Econometrica, 43 (07 1975), 745–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. W. Jr, and Warner, J. B.. “On Financial Contracting: An Analysis of Bond Covenants.” Journal of Financial Economics, 1 (06 1979), 117–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thatcher, J. “The Choice of Call Provision Terms: Evidence of the Existence of Agency Costs of Debt.” Journal of Finance, 40 (06 1985), 549–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yawitz, J., and Anderson, J.. “The Effect of Refunding on Shareholder Wealth.” Journal of Finance, 32 (12 1977), 1738–1746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar