Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:58:53.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Blockholder Heterogeneity, CEO Compensation, and Firm Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2016

Abstract

This paper examines heterogeneity in blockholder monitoring across investor types. We document which blockholder types (e.g., mutual funds, hedge funds) are more likely to be associated with active monitoring and show that firms targeted by such blockholders are more likely to increase the equity portion of chief executive officer (CEO) pay. Further, using market-wide and exogenous shocks to liquidity to identify differences in efficacy across blockholder types, we observe greater operating-performance improvements in actively monitored firms when passive monitoring is less effective, suggesting causal impact. We propose differences in compensation arrangements across blockholder types as a mechanism underlying blockholders’ heterogeneous role.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, V. V., and Pedersen, L. H.. “Asset Pricing with Liquidity Risk.” Journal of Financial Economics, 77 (2005), 375410.Google Scholar
Admati, A. R., and Pfleiderer, P.. “The ‘Wall Street Walk’ and Shareholder Activism: Exit as a Form of Voice.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 26452685.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, R. K., and Samwick, A. A.. “Executive Compensation, Strategic Competition, and Relative Performance Evaluation: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Finance, 54 (1999), 19992043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, A., and Nasser, T.. “Blockholders on Boards and CEO Compensation, Turnover and Firm Valuation.” Working Paper, University of Alabama (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aiken, A. L.; Clifford, C. P.; and Ellis, J. A.. “Hedge Funds and Discretionary Liquidity Restrictions.” Journal of Financial Economics, 116 (2015), 197218.Google Scholar
Allen, J. W., and Phillips, G. M.. “Corporate Equity Ownership, Strategic Alliances, and Product Market Relationships.” Journal of Finance, 55 (2000), 27912815.Google Scholar
Almazan, A.; Hartzell, J. C.; and Starks, L. T.. “Active Institutional Shareholders and Costs of Monitoring: Evidence from Executive Compensation.” Financial Management, 34 (2005), 534.Google Scholar
Amihud, Y.Illiquidity and Stock Returns: Cross-Section and Time-Series Effects.” Journal of Financial Markets, 5 (2002), 3156.Google Scholar
Amihud, Y., and Mendelson, H.. “Asset Pricing and the Bid-Ask Spread.” Journal of Financial Economics, 17 (1986), 223249.Google Scholar
Baker, G., and Hall, B.. “CEO Incentives and Firm Size.” Journal of Labor Economics, 22 (2004), 767798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, S.; Leleux, B.; and Vermaelen, T.. “Large Shareholdings and Corporate Control: An Analysis of Stake Purchases by French Holding Companies.” European Financial Management, 3 (1997), 2343.Google Scholar
Barber, B. M., and Lyon, J. D.. “Detecting Abnormal Operating Performance: The Empirical Power and Specification of Test Statistics.” Journal of Financial Economics, 41 (1996), 359399.Google Scholar
Barclay, M. J., and Holderness, C. G.. “Private Benefits from Control of Public Corporations.” Journal of Financial Economics, 25 (1989), 371395.Google Scholar
Becker, B.; Cronqvist, H.; and Fahlenbrach, R.. “Estimating the Effects of Large Shareholders Using a Geographic Instrument.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46 (2011), 907942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bethel, J. E.; Liebeskind, J. P.; and Opler, T.. “Block Share Purchases and Corporate Performance.” Journal of Finance, 53 (1998), 605634.Google Scholar
Bhagat, S.; Black, B.; and Blair, M.. “Relational Investing and Firm Performance.” Journal of Financial Research, 27 (2004), 130.Google Scholar
Bharath, S. T.; Jayaraman, S.; and Nagar, V.. “Exit as Governance: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Finance, 68 (2013), 25152547.Google Scholar
Bhide, A.The Hidden Costs of Stock Market Liquidity.” Journal of Financial Economics, 34 (1993), 3151.Google Scholar
Black, B. S., and Coffee, J. C.. “Hail Britannia? Institutional Investor Behavior under Limited Regulation.” Michigan Law Review, 92 (1994), 19972087.Google Scholar
Borokhovich, K. A.; Brunarski, K.; Harman, Y. S.; and Parrino, R.. “Variation in the Monitoring Incentives of Outside Stockholders.” Journal of Law and Economics, 49 (2006), 651680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brav, A.; Jiang, W.; Partnoy, F.; and Thomas, R.. “Hedge Fund Activism, Corporate Governance, and Firm Performance.” Journal of Finance, 63 (2008), 17291775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brickley, J. A.; Lease, R. C.; and Smith, C. W.. “Ownership Structure and Voting on Antitakeover Amendments.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (1988), 267291.Google Scholar
Butz, D. A.How Do Large Minority Shareholders Wield Control?Managerial and Decision Economics, 15 (1994), 291298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X.; Harford, J.; and Li, K.. “Monitoring: Which Institutions Matter?Journal of Financial Economics, 86 (2007), 279305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chordia, T.; Sarkar, A.; and Subrahmanyam, A.. “An Empirical Analysis of Stock and Bond Market Liquidity.” Review of Financial Studies, 18 (2005), 85129.Google Scholar
Clifford, C. P.Value Creation or Destruction? Hedge Funds as Shareholder Activists.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 14 (2008), 323336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffee, J. C.Liquidity versus Control: The Institutional Investor as Corporate Monitor.” Columbia Law Review, 91 (1991), 12771368.Google Scholar
Core, J. E.; Holthausen, R. W.; and Larcker, D. F.. “Corporate Governance, Chief Executive Officer Compensation, and Firm Performance.” Journal of Financial Economics, 51 (1999), 371406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornett, M. M.; Marcus, A. J.; Saunders, A.; and Tehranian, H.. “The Impact of Institutional Ownership on Corporate Operating Performance.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 31 (2007), 17711794.Google Scholar
Cronqvist, H., and Fahlenbrach, R.. “Large Shareholders and Corporate Policies.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 39413976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronqvist, H., and Fahlenbrach, R.. “CEO Contract Design: How Do Strong Principals Do It?Journal of Financial Economics, 108 (2013), 659674.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, A., and Piacentino, G.. “The Wall Street Walk When Blockholders Compete for Flows.” Journal of Finance, 70 (2015), 28532896.Google Scholar
Deli, D. N.Mutual Fund Advisory Contracts: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Finance, 57 (2002), 109133.Google Scholar
Demsetz, H., and Lehn, K.. “The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences.” Journal of Political Economy, 93 (1985), 11551177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demsetz, H., and Villalonga, B.. “Ownership Structure and Corporate Performance.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 7 (2001), 209233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, D. J.; Denis, D. K.; and Sarin, A.. “Ownership Structure and Top Executive Turnover.” Journal of Financial Economics, 45 (1997), 193221.Google Scholar
Dlugosz, J.; Fahlenbrach, R.; Gompers, P.; and Metrick, A.. “Large Blocks of Stock: Prevalence, Size, and Measurement.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 12 (2006), 594618.Google Scholar
Edmans, A.Blockholder Trading, Market Efficiency, and Managerial Myopia.” Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 24812513.Google Scholar
Edmans, A.Blockholders and Corporate Governance.” Annual Review of Financial Economics, 6 (2014), 2350.Google Scholar
Edmans, A.; Fang, V. W.; and Zur, E.. “The Effect of Liquidity on Governance.” Review of Financial Studies, 26 (2013), 14431482.Google Scholar
Edmans, A., and Manso, G.. “Governance through Trading and Intervention: A Theory of Multiple Blockholders.” Review of Financial Studies, 24 (2011), 23952428.Google Scholar
Fich, E.; Harford, J.; and Tran, A.. “Motivated Monitors: The Importance of Institutional Investors’ Portfolio Weights.” Journal of Financial Economics, 118 (2015), 2148.Google Scholar
Gabaix, X., and Landier, A.. “Why Has CEO Pay Increased So Much?Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123 (2008), 49100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gantchev, N., and Jotikasthira, C.. “Hedge Fund Activists: Do They Take Cues from Institutional Exit?” Working Paper, University of North Carolina (2014).Google Scholar
Gillan, S. L., and Starks, L. T.. “A Survey of Shareholder Activism: Motivation and Empirical Evidence.” Contemporary Finance Digest, 2 (1998), 1034.Google Scholar
Gillan, S. L., and Starks, L. T.. “Corporate Governance Proposals and Shareholder Activism: The Role of Institutional Investors.” Journal of Financial Economics, 57 (2000), 275305.Google Scholar
Goetzmann, W. N.; Ingersoll, J. E.; and Ross, S. A.. “High-Water Marks and Hedge Fund Management Contracts.” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 16851718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golec, J. H.Empirical Tests of a Principal–Agent Model of the Investor–Investment Advisor Relationship.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27 (1992), 8195.Google Scholar
Gompers, P., and Lerner, J.. “An Analysis of Compensation in the U.S. Venture Capital Partnership.” Journal of Financial Economics, 51 (1999), 344.Google Scholar
Gordon, L. A., and Pound, J.. “ESOPs and Corporate Control.” Journal of Financial Economics, 27 (1990), 525555.Google Scholar
Goyenko, R. Y.; Holden, C. W.; and Trzcinka, C. A.. “Do Liquidity Measures Measure Liquidity?Journal of Financial Economics, 92 (2009), 153181.Google Scholar
Greenwood, R., and Schor, M.. “Investor Activism and Takeovers.” Journal of Financial Economics, 92 (2009), 362375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartzell, J. C., and Starks, L. T.. “Institutional Investors and Executive Compensation.” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 23512374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himmelberg, C. P.; Hubbard, R. G.; and Palia, D.. “Understanding the Determinants of Managerial Ownership and the Link between Ownership and Performance.” Journal of Financial Economics, 53 (1999), 353384.Google Scholar
Holderness, C. G., and Sheehan, D. P.. “The Role of Majority Shareholders in Publicly Held Corporations: An Exploratory Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (1988), 317346.Google Scholar
Holmstrom, B., and Tirole, J.. “Market Liquidity and Performance Monitoring.” Journal of Political Economy, 101 (1993), 678709.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. C.Agency Cost of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers.” American Economic Review, 76 (1986), 323329.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. C.Takeovers: Their Causes and Consequences.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2 (1988), 2148.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. C., and Murphy, K. J.. “Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives.” Journal of Political Economy, 98 (1990), 225264.Google Scholar
Kahn, C., and Winton, A.. “Ownership Structure, Speculation, and Shareholder Intervention.” Journal of Finance, 53 (1998), 99129.Google Scholar
Karpoff, J.Corporate Finance and Corporate Control: An Empirical Research Agenda.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 155 (1999), 239246.Google Scholar
Klein, A., and Zur, E.. “Entrepreneurial Shareholder Activism: Hedge Funds and Other Private Investors.” Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 187230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazear, E.Salaries and Piece Rates.” Journal of Business, 59 (1986), 405431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levit, D.“Soft Shareholder Activism.” Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania (2014).Google Scholar
Maug, E.Large Shareholders as Monitors: Is There a Trade-Off between Liquidity and Control?Journal of Finance, 53 (1998), 6598.Google Scholar
McConnell, J. J., and Servaes, H.. “Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value.” Journal of Financial Economics, 27 (1990), 595612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metrick, A., and Yasuda, A.. “The Economics of Private Equity Funds.” Review of Financial Studies, 23 (2010), 23032341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikkelson, W. H., and Ruback, R. S.. “An Empirical Analysis of the Interfirm Equity Investment Process.” Journal of Financial Economics, 14 (1985), 523553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morck, R.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R. W.. “Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (1988), 293315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, K. J.Executive Compensation.” In Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3, Ashenfelter, O. and Card, D., eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier (1999).Google Scholar
Parrino, R.; Sias, R. W.; and Starks, L. T.. “Voting with Their Feet: Institutional Ownership Changes around Forced CEO Turnover.” Journal of Financial Economics, 68 (2003), 346.Google Scholar
Rogers, W.Regression Standard Errors in Clustered Samples.” Stata Technical Bulletin, 13 (1993), 1923.Google Scholar
Rose, N. L., and Wolfram, C.. “Regulating Executive Pay: Using the Tax Code to Influence Chief Executive Officer Compensation.” Journal of Labor Economics, 20 (2002), S138S175.Google Scholar
Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W.. “Large Shareholders and Corporate Control.” Journal of Political Economy, 94 (1986), 461488.Google Scholar
Shome, D., and Singh, S.. “Firm Value and External Blockholdings.” Financial Management, 24 (1995), 314.Google Scholar
Smith, C., and Watts, R.. “The Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation Policies.” Journal of Financial Economics, 32 (1992), 263292.Google Scholar
Strickland, D.; Wiles, K.; and Zenner, M.. “A Requiem for the USA: Is Small Shareholder Monitoring Effective?Journal of Financial Economics, 40 (1996), 319338.Google Scholar
Subrahmanyam, A., and Titman, S.. “Feedback from Stock Prices to Cash Flows.” Journal of Finance, 56 (2001), 23892413.Google Scholar
Wahal, S.Pension Fund Activism and Firm Performance.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31 (1996), 123.Google Scholar
White, H.A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica, 48 (1980), 817830.Google Scholar