Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T06:26:02.853Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance Changes following Top Management Turnover: Evidence from Open-End Mutual Funds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Ajay Khorana
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I examine the impact of mutual fund manager replacement on subsequent fund performance. Using a sample of 393 domestic equity and bond fund managers that were replaced over the 1979–1991 period, for the underperformers, I document significant improvements in post-replacement performance relative to the past performance of the fund. On the other hand, the replacement of overperforming managers results in deterioration in post-replacement performance. I find evidence supporting the presence of strategic risk shifting in the fund portfolios prior to replacement. Futhermore, consistent with the notion of window dressing, I document that the level of portfolio turnover activity decreases significantly in the post-replacement period. Lastly, the replacement of poor performers is preceded by significant decreases in net new inflows in the fund.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , September 2001 , pp. 371 - 393
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blake, C. R.; Elton, E. J.; and Gruber, M. J.. “The Performance of Bond Mutual Funds.” Journal of Business, 66 (1993), 371–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. J., and Goetzmann, W. N.. “Performance Persistence.” Journal of Finance, 50 (1995), 679–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, K. C.; Harlow, W. V.; and Starks, L. T.. “Of Tournaments and Temptations: An Analysis of Managerial Incentives in the Mutual Fund Industry.” Journal of Finance, 51 (1996), 85–110.Google Scholar
Carhart, M. M. “On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 57–82.Google Scholar
Chevalier, J., and Ellison, G.. “Career Concerns of Mutual Fund Managers.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2 (1999), 389–432.Google Scholar
Coughlan, A. T., and Schmidt, R. W.. “Executive Compensation, Managerial Turnover, and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7 (1985), 43–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, D., and Denis, D. K.. “Performance Changes following Top Management Dismissals.” Journal of Finance, 50 (1995), 1029–1058.Google Scholar
Elton, E. J.; Gruber, M. J.; Das, S.; and Hlavka, M.. “Efficiency with Costly Information: A Re-Interpretation of Evidence from Managed Portfolios.” Review of Financial Studies, 6 (1993), 1–21.Google Scholar
Fama, E. “Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm.” Journal of Political Economy, 88 (1980), 288–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E., and French, K. R.. “Common Risk Factors in Return on Bonds and Stocks.” Journal of Financial Economics, 33 (1993), 3–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E., and Jensen, M.. “Separation of Ownership and Control.” Journal of Law and Economics, 26 (1983), 301–325.Google Scholar
Grinblatt, M.; Titman, S.; and Wermers, R.. “Momentum Investment Strategies, Portfolio Performance, and Herding: A Study of Mutual Fund Behaviour.” American Economic Review, 85 (1995), 1088–1105.Google Scholar
Gruber, M. J. “Another Puzzle: The Growth in Actively Managed Mutual Funds.” Journal of Finance, 51 (1996), 783–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendricks, D.; Patel, J.; and Zeckhauser, R.. “Hot Hands in Mutual Funds: Short-Run Persistence of Relative Performance, 1974–1988.” Journal of Finance, 48 (1993), 93–130.Google Scholar
Ippolito, R. A. “Consumer Reaction to Measures of Poor Quality: Evidence from the Mutual Fund Industry.” Journal of Law and Economics, 35 (1992), 45–70.Google Scholar
Jegadeesh, N., and Titman, S.. “Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency.” Journal of Finance, 48 (1993), 65–91.Google Scholar
Khorana, A. “Top Management Turnover: An Empirical Investigation of Mutual Fund Managers.” Journal of Financial Economics, 40 (1996), 403–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakonishok, J.; Shleifer, A.; Thaler, R.; and Vishny, R. W.. “Window Dressing by Pension Fund Managers.” Journal of Financial Economics, 40 (1996), 403–427.Google Scholar
Malkiel, B. “Returns from Investing in Equity Mutual Funds: 1971 to 1991.” Journal of Finance, 50 (1995), 549–572.Google Scholar
Morck, R.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R. W.. “Alternative Mechanisms for Corporate Control.” American Economic Review, 89 (1989), 842–852.Google Scholar
Sharpe, W. F. “Capital Asset Princes: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risks.” Journal Finance, 19 (1964), 842–852.Google Scholar
Shleif, A., and Vishny, R. W.. “Large Shareholders and Corporate Control.” Journal of Political Economy, 95 (1986), 461–488.Google Scholar
Sirri, E. R., and Tufano, P.. “Costly Search and Mutual Fund Flows.” Journal of Finance, 53 (1998), 1589–1622.Google Scholar
Warner, J. B.; Watts, R. L.; and Wruck, K. H.. “Stock Prices and Top Management Changes.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (1988), 461–492.Google Scholar
Weisbach, M. S. “Outside Directors and CEO Turnover.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (1988), 431–460.Google Scholar